From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH 055/203] Split out eval_op_objc_msgcall
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2021 14:44:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210101214723.1784144-56-tom@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210101214723.1784144-1-tom@tromey.com>
This splits OP_OBJC_MSGCALL into a new function for future use.
gdb/ChangeLog
2021-01-01 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
* eval.c (eval_op_objc_msgcall): New function.
(evaluate_subexp_standard): Use it.
---
gdb/ChangeLog | 5 +
gdb/eval.c | 530 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
2 files changed, 286 insertions(+), 249 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/eval.c b/gdb/eval.c
index b0d2a217ee5..8af14fc723b 100644
--- a/gdb/eval.c
+++ b/gdb/eval.c
@@ -2064,6 +2064,277 @@ eval_binop_assign_modify (struct type *expect_type, struct expression *exp,
return value_assign (arg1, arg2);
}
+/* Note that ARGS needs 2 empty slots up front and must end with a
+ null pointer. */
+static struct value *
+eval_op_objc_msgcall (struct type *expect_type, struct expression *exp,
+ enum noside noside, CORE_ADDR selector,
+ value *target, gdb::array_view<value *> args)
+{
+ CORE_ADDR responds_selector = 0;
+ CORE_ADDR method_selector = 0;
+
+ int struct_return = 0;
+
+ struct value *msg_send = NULL;
+ struct value *msg_send_stret = NULL;
+ int gnu_runtime = 0;
+
+ struct value *method = NULL;
+ struct value *called_method = NULL;
+
+ struct type *selector_type = NULL;
+ struct type *long_type;
+ struct type *type;
+
+ struct value *ret = NULL;
+ CORE_ADDR addr = 0;
+
+ value *argvec[5];
+
+ long_type = builtin_type (exp->gdbarch)->builtin_long;
+ selector_type = builtin_type (exp->gdbarch)->builtin_data_ptr;
+
+ if (value_as_long (target) == 0)
+ return value_from_longest (long_type, 0);
+
+ if (lookup_minimal_symbol ("objc_msg_lookup", 0, 0).minsym)
+ gnu_runtime = 1;
+
+ /* Find the method dispatch (Apple runtime) or method lookup
+ (GNU runtime) function for Objective-C. These will be used
+ to lookup the symbol information for the method. If we
+ can't find any symbol information, then we'll use these to
+ call the method, otherwise we can call the method
+ directly. The msg_send_stret function is used in the special
+ case of a method that returns a structure (Apple runtime
+ only). */
+ if (gnu_runtime)
+ {
+ type = selector_type;
+
+ type = lookup_function_type (type);
+ type = lookup_pointer_type (type);
+ type = lookup_function_type (type);
+ type = lookup_pointer_type (type);
+
+ msg_send = find_function_in_inferior ("objc_msg_lookup", NULL);
+ msg_send_stret
+ = find_function_in_inferior ("objc_msg_lookup", NULL);
+
+ msg_send = value_from_pointer (type, value_as_address (msg_send));
+ msg_send_stret = value_from_pointer (type,
+ value_as_address (msg_send_stret));
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ msg_send = find_function_in_inferior ("objc_msgSend", NULL);
+ /* Special dispatcher for methods returning structs. */
+ msg_send_stret
+ = find_function_in_inferior ("objc_msgSend_stret", NULL);
+ }
+
+ /* Verify the target object responds to this method. The
+ standard top-level 'Object' class uses a different name for
+ the verification method than the non-standard, but more
+ often used, 'NSObject' class. Make sure we check for both. */
+
+ responds_selector
+ = lookup_child_selector (exp->gdbarch, "respondsToSelector:");
+ if (responds_selector == 0)
+ responds_selector
+ = lookup_child_selector (exp->gdbarch, "respondsTo:");
+
+ if (responds_selector == 0)
+ error (_("no 'respondsTo:' or 'respondsToSelector:' method"));
+
+ method_selector
+ = lookup_child_selector (exp->gdbarch, "methodForSelector:");
+ if (method_selector == 0)
+ method_selector
+ = lookup_child_selector (exp->gdbarch, "methodFor:");
+
+ if (method_selector == 0)
+ error (_("no 'methodFor:' or 'methodForSelector:' method"));
+
+ /* Call the verification method, to make sure that the target
+ class implements the desired method. */
+
+ argvec[0] = msg_send;
+ argvec[1] = target;
+ argvec[2] = value_from_longest (long_type, responds_selector);
+ argvec[3] = value_from_longest (long_type, selector);
+ argvec[4] = 0;
+
+ ret = call_function_by_hand (argvec[0], NULL, {argvec + 1, 3});
+ if (gnu_runtime)
+ {
+ /* Function objc_msg_lookup returns a pointer. */
+ argvec[0] = ret;
+ ret = call_function_by_hand (argvec[0], NULL, {argvec + 1, 3});
+ }
+ if (value_as_long (ret) == 0)
+ error (_("Target does not respond to this message selector."));
+
+ /* Call "methodForSelector:" method, to get the address of a
+ function method that implements this selector for this
+ class. If we can find a symbol at that address, then we
+ know the return type, parameter types etc. (that's a good
+ thing). */
+
+ argvec[0] = msg_send;
+ argvec[1] = target;
+ argvec[2] = value_from_longest (long_type, method_selector);
+ argvec[3] = value_from_longest (long_type, selector);
+ argvec[4] = 0;
+
+ ret = call_function_by_hand (argvec[0], NULL, {argvec + 1, 3});
+ if (gnu_runtime)
+ {
+ argvec[0] = ret;
+ ret = call_function_by_hand (argvec[0], NULL, {argvec + 1, 3});
+ }
+
+ /* ret should now be the selector. */
+
+ addr = value_as_long (ret);
+ if (addr)
+ {
+ struct symbol *sym = NULL;
+
+ /* The address might point to a function descriptor;
+ resolve it to the actual code address instead. */
+ addr = gdbarch_convert_from_func_ptr_addr (exp->gdbarch, addr,
+ current_top_target ());
+
+ /* Is it a high_level symbol? */
+ sym = find_pc_function (addr);
+ if (sym != NULL)
+ method = value_of_variable (sym, 0);
+ }
+
+ /* If we found a method with symbol information, check to see
+ if it returns a struct. Otherwise assume it doesn't. */
+
+ if (method)
+ {
+ CORE_ADDR funaddr;
+ struct type *val_type;
+
+ funaddr = find_function_addr (method, &val_type);
+
+ block_for_pc (funaddr);
+
+ val_type = check_typedef (val_type);
+
+ if ((val_type == NULL)
+ || (val_type->code () == TYPE_CODE_ERROR))
+ {
+ if (expect_type != NULL)
+ val_type = expect_type;
+ }
+
+ struct_return = using_struct_return (exp->gdbarch, method,
+ val_type);
+ }
+ else if (expect_type != NULL)
+ {
+ struct_return = using_struct_return (exp->gdbarch, NULL,
+ check_typedef (expect_type));
+ }
+
+ /* Found a function symbol. Now we will substitute its
+ value in place of the message dispatcher (obj_msgSend),
+ so that we call the method directly instead of thru
+ the dispatcher. The main reason for doing this is that
+ we can now evaluate the return value and parameter values
+ according to their known data types, in case we need to
+ do things like promotion, dereferencing, special handling
+ of structs and doubles, etc.
+
+ We want to use the type signature of 'method', but still
+ jump to objc_msgSend() or objc_msgSend_stret() to better
+ mimic the behavior of the runtime. */
+
+ if (method)
+ {
+ if (value_type (method)->code () != TYPE_CODE_FUNC)
+ error (_("method address has symbol information "
+ "with non-function type; skipping"));
+
+ /* Create a function pointer of the appropriate type, and
+ replace its value with the value of msg_send or
+ msg_send_stret. We must use a pointer here, as
+ msg_send and msg_send_stret are of pointer type, and
+ the representation may be different on systems that use
+ function descriptors. */
+ if (struct_return)
+ called_method
+ = value_from_pointer (lookup_pointer_type (value_type (method)),
+ value_as_address (msg_send_stret));
+ else
+ called_method
+ = value_from_pointer (lookup_pointer_type (value_type (method)),
+ value_as_address (msg_send));
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ if (struct_return)
+ called_method = msg_send_stret;
+ else
+ called_method = msg_send;
+ }
+
+ if (noside == EVAL_SKIP)
+ return eval_skip_value (exp);
+
+ if (noside == EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS)
+ {
+ /* If the return type doesn't look like a function type,
+ call an error. This can happen if somebody tries to
+ turn a variable into a function call. This is here
+ because people often want to call, eg, strcmp, which
+ gdb doesn't know is a function. If gdb isn't asked for
+ it's opinion (ie. through "whatis"), it won't offer
+ it. */
+
+ struct type *callee_type = value_type (called_method);
+
+ if (callee_type && callee_type->code () == TYPE_CODE_PTR)
+ callee_type = TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (callee_type);
+ callee_type = TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (callee_type);
+
+ if (callee_type)
+ {
+ if ((callee_type->code () == TYPE_CODE_ERROR) && expect_type)
+ return allocate_value (expect_type);
+ else
+ return allocate_value (callee_type);
+ }
+ else
+ error (_("Expression of type other than "
+ "\"method returning ...\" used as a method"));
+ }
+
+ /* Now depending on whether we found a symbol for the method,
+ we will either call the runtime dispatcher or the method
+ directly. */
+
+ args[0] = target;
+ args[1] = value_from_longest (long_type, selector);
+
+ if (gnu_runtime && (method != NULL))
+ {
+ /* Function objc_msg_lookup returns a pointer. */
+ struct type *tem_type = value_type (called_method);
+ tem_type = lookup_pointer_type (lookup_function_type (tem_type));
+ deprecated_set_value_type (called_method, tem_type);
+ called_method = call_function_by_hand (called_method, NULL, args);
+ }
+
+ return call_function_by_hand (called_method, NULL, args);
+}
+
struct value *
evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *expect_type,
struct expression *exp, int *pos,
@@ -2351,36 +2622,20 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *expect_type,
case OP_OBJC_MSGCALL:
{ /* Objective C message (method) call. */
-
- CORE_ADDR responds_selector = 0;
- CORE_ADDR method_selector = 0;
-
CORE_ADDR selector = 0;
- int struct_return = 0;
enum noside sub_no_side = EVAL_NORMAL;
- struct value *msg_send = NULL;
- struct value *msg_send_stret = NULL;
- int gnu_runtime = 0;
-
struct value *target = NULL;
- struct value *method = NULL;
- struct value *called_method = NULL;
struct type *selector_type = NULL;
- struct type *long_type;
-
- struct value *ret = NULL;
- CORE_ADDR addr = 0;
selector = exp->elts[pc + 1].longconst;
nargs = exp->elts[pc + 2].longconst;
- argvec = XALLOCAVEC (struct value *, nargs + 5);
+ argvec = XALLOCAVEC (struct value *, nargs + 3);
(*pos) += 3;
- long_type = builtin_type (exp->gdbarch)->builtin_long;
selector_type = builtin_type (exp->gdbarch)->builtin_data_ptr;
if (noside == EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS)
@@ -2391,249 +2646,26 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *expect_type,
target = evaluate_subexp (selector_type, exp, pos, sub_no_side);
if (value_as_long (target) == 0)
- return value_from_longest (long_type, 0);
-
- if (lookup_minimal_symbol ("objc_msg_lookup", 0, 0).minsym)
- gnu_runtime = 1;
-
- /* Find the method dispatch (Apple runtime) or method lookup
- (GNU runtime) function for Objective-C. These will be used
- to lookup the symbol information for the method. If we
- can't find any symbol information, then we'll use these to
- call the method, otherwise we can call the method
- directly. The msg_send_stret function is used in the special
- case of a method that returns a structure (Apple runtime
- only). */
- if (gnu_runtime)
- {
- type = selector_type;
-
- type = lookup_function_type (type);
- type = lookup_pointer_type (type);
- type = lookup_function_type (type);
- type = lookup_pointer_type (type);
-
- msg_send = find_function_in_inferior ("objc_msg_lookup", NULL);
- msg_send_stret
- = find_function_in_inferior ("objc_msg_lookup", NULL);
-
- msg_send = value_from_pointer (type, value_as_address (msg_send));
- msg_send_stret = value_from_pointer (type,
- value_as_address (msg_send_stret));
- }
+ sub_no_side = EVAL_SKIP;
else
- {
- msg_send = find_function_in_inferior ("objc_msgSend", NULL);
- /* Special dispatcher for methods returning structs. */
- msg_send_stret
- = find_function_in_inferior ("objc_msgSend_stret", NULL);
- }
-
- /* Verify the target object responds to this method. The
- standard top-level 'Object' class uses a different name for
- the verification method than the non-standard, but more
- often used, 'NSObject' class. Make sure we check for both. */
-
- responds_selector
- = lookup_child_selector (exp->gdbarch, "respondsToSelector:");
- if (responds_selector == 0)
- responds_selector
- = lookup_child_selector (exp->gdbarch, "respondsTo:");
-
- if (responds_selector == 0)
- error (_("no 'respondsTo:' or 'respondsToSelector:' method"));
-
- method_selector
- = lookup_child_selector (exp->gdbarch, "methodForSelector:");
- if (method_selector == 0)
- method_selector
- = lookup_child_selector (exp->gdbarch, "methodFor:");
-
- if (method_selector == 0)
- error (_("no 'methodFor:' or 'methodForSelector:' method"));
-
- /* Call the verification method, to make sure that the target
- class implements the desired method. */
-
- argvec[0] = msg_send;
- argvec[1] = target;
- argvec[2] = value_from_longest (long_type, responds_selector);
- argvec[3] = value_from_longest (long_type, selector);
- argvec[4] = 0;
-
- ret = call_function_by_hand (argvec[0], NULL, {argvec + 1, 3});
- if (gnu_runtime)
- {
- /* Function objc_msg_lookup returns a pointer. */
- argvec[0] = ret;
- ret = call_function_by_hand (argvec[0], NULL, {argvec + 1, 3});
- }
- if (value_as_long (ret) == 0)
- error (_("Target does not respond to this message selector."));
-
- /* Call "methodForSelector:" method, to get the address of a
- function method that implements this selector for this
- class. If we can find a symbol at that address, then we
- know the return type, parameter types etc. (that's a good
- thing). */
-
- argvec[0] = msg_send;
- argvec[1] = target;
- argvec[2] = value_from_longest (long_type, method_selector);
- argvec[3] = value_from_longest (long_type, selector);
- argvec[4] = 0;
-
- ret = call_function_by_hand (argvec[0], NULL, {argvec + 1, 3});
- if (gnu_runtime)
- {
- argvec[0] = ret;
- ret = call_function_by_hand (argvec[0], NULL, {argvec + 1, 3});
- }
-
- /* ret should now be the selector. */
-
- addr = value_as_long (ret);
- if (addr)
- {
- struct symbol *sym = NULL;
-
- /* The address might point to a function descriptor;
- resolve it to the actual code address instead. */
- addr = gdbarch_convert_from_func_ptr_addr (exp->gdbarch, addr,
- current_top_target ());
-
- /* Is it a high_level symbol? */
- sym = find_pc_function (addr);
- if (sym != NULL)
- method = value_of_variable (sym, 0);
- }
-
- /* If we found a method with symbol information, check to see
- if it returns a struct. Otherwise assume it doesn't. */
-
- if (method)
- {
- CORE_ADDR funaddr;
- struct type *val_type;
-
- funaddr = find_function_addr (method, &val_type);
-
- block_for_pc (funaddr);
-
- val_type = check_typedef (val_type);
-
- if ((val_type == NULL)
- || (val_type->code () == TYPE_CODE_ERROR))
- {
- if (expect_type != NULL)
- val_type = expect_type;
- }
-
- struct_return = using_struct_return (exp->gdbarch, method,
- val_type);
- }
- else if (expect_type != NULL)
- {
- struct_return = using_struct_return (exp->gdbarch, NULL,
- check_typedef (expect_type));
- }
-
- /* Found a function symbol. Now we will substitute its
- value in place of the message dispatcher (obj_msgSend),
- so that we call the method directly instead of thru
- the dispatcher. The main reason for doing this is that
- we can now evaluate the return value and parameter values
- according to their known data types, in case we need to
- do things like promotion, dereferencing, special handling
- of structs and doubles, etc.
-
- We want to use the type signature of 'method', but still
- jump to objc_msgSend() or objc_msgSend_stret() to better
- mimic the behavior of the runtime. */
-
- if (method)
- {
- if (value_type (method)->code () != TYPE_CODE_FUNC)
- error (_("method address has symbol information "
- "with non-function type; skipping"));
-
- /* Create a function pointer of the appropriate type, and
- replace its value with the value of msg_send or
- msg_send_stret. We must use a pointer here, as
- msg_send and msg_send_stret are of pointer type, and
- the representation may be different on systems that use
- function descriptors. */
- if (struct_return)
- called_method
- = value_from_pointer (lookup_pointer_type (value_type (method)),
- value_as_address (msg_send_stret));
- else
- called_method
- = value_from_pointer (lookup_pointer_type (value_type (method)),
- value_as_address (msg_send));
- }
- else
- {
- if (struct_return)
- called_method = msg_send_stret;
- else
- called_method = msg_send;
- }
-
- if (noside == EVAL_SKIP)
- return eval_skip_value (exp);
-
- if (noside == EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS)
- {
- /* If the return type doesn't look like a function type,
- call an error. This can happen if somebody tries to
- turn a variable into a function call. This is here
- because people often want to call, eg, strcmp, which
- gdb doesn't know is a function. If gdb isn't asked for
- it's opinion (ie. through "whatis"), it won't offer
- it. */
-
- struct type *callee_type = value_type (called_method);
-
- if (callee_type && callee_type->code () == TYPE_CODE_PTR)
- callee_type = TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (callee_type);
- callee_type = TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (callee_type);
-
- if (callee_type)
- {
- if ((callee_type->code () == TYPE_CODE_ERROR) && expect_type)
- return allocate_value (expect_type);
- else
- return allocate_value (callee_type);
- }
- else
- error (_("Expression of type other than "
- "\"method returning ...\" used as a method"));
- }
+ sub_no_side = noside;
/* Now depending on whether we found a symbol for the method,
we will either call the runtime dispatcher or the method
directly. */
- argvec[0] = called_method;
- argvec[1] = target;
- argvec[2] = value_from_longest (long_type, selector);
+ argvec[0] = nullptr;
+ argvec[1] = nullptr;
/* User-supplied arguments. */
for (tem = 0; tem < nargs; tem++)
- argvec[tem + 3] = evaluate_subexp_with_coercion (exp, pos, noside);
+ argvec[tem + 2] = evaluate_subexp_with_coercion (exp, pos,
+ sub_no_side);
argvec[tem + 3] = 0;
- auto call_args = gdb::make_array_view (argvec + 1, nargs + 2);
-
- if (gnu_runtime && (method != NULL))
- {
- /* Function objc_msg_lookup returns a pointer. */
- deprecated_set_value_type (argvec[0],
- lookup_pointer_type (lookup_function_type (value_type (argvec[0]))));
- argvec[0] = call_function_by_hand (argvec[0], NULL, call_args);
- }
+ auto call_args = gdb::make_array_view (argvec, nargs + 3);
- return call_function_by_hand (argvec[0], NULL, call_args);
+ return eval_op_objc_msgcall (expect_type, exp, noside, selector,
+ target, call_args);
}
break;
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-01 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 225+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-01 21:44 [PATCH 000/203] Refactor expressions Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 001/203] Split out eval_op_scope Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 002/203] Split out eval_op_var_entry_value Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 003/203] Split out eval_op_var_msym_value Tom Tromey
2021-01-04 11:43 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-02-13 19:37 ` Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 004/203] Split out eval_op_func_static_var Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 005/203] Split out eval_op_register Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 006/203] Split out eval_op_string Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 007/203] Split out eval_op_objc_selector Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 008/203] Split out eval_op_concat Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 009/203] what is this code for Tom Tromey
2021-01-03 6:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2021-01-25 2:28 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-25 3:27 ` Tom Tromey
2021-02-11 2:25 ` Tom Tromey
2021-02-13 19:37 ` Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 010/203] Split out eval_op_ternop Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 011/203] Split out eval_op_structop_struct Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 012/203] Split out eval_op_structop_ptr Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 013/203] Split out eval_op_member Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 014/203] Split out eval_op_add Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 015/203] Split out eval_op_sub Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 016/203] Split out eval_op_binary Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 017/203] Split out eval_op_subscript Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 018/203] Split out eval_op_equal Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 019/203] Split out eval_op_notequal Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 020/203] Split out eval_op_less Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 021/203] Split out eval_op_gtr Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 022/203] Split out eval_op_geq Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 023/203] Split out eval_op_leq Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 024/203] Split out eval_op_repeat Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 025/203] Split out eval_op_plus Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 026/203] Split out eval_op_neg Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 027/203] Split out eval_op_complement Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 028/203] Split out eval_op_lognot Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 029/203] Split out eval_op_ind Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 030/203] Split out eval_op_alignof Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 031/203] Split out eval_op_memval Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 032/203] Split out eval_op_preinc Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 033/203] Split out eval_op_predec Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 034/203] Split out eval_op_postinc Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 035/203] Split out eval_op_postdec Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 036/203] Split out eval_op_type Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 037/203] Split out eval_op_f_abs Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 038/203] Split out eval_op_f_mod Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 039/203] Split out eval_op_f_ceil Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 040/203] Split out eval_op_f_floor Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 041/203] Split out eval_op_f_modulo Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 042/203] Split out eval_op_f_cmplx Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 043/203] Split out eval_op_f_kind Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 044/203] Change parameters to rust_range Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 045/203] Change parameters to rust_subscript Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 046/203] Split out eval_op_rust_ind Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 047/203] Split out eval_op_rust_complement Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 048/203] Split out eval_op_rust_array Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 049/203] Split out eval_op_rust_struct_anon Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 050/203] Split out eval_op_rust_structop Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 051/203] Split helper functions Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 052/203] Split out eval_op_m2_high Tom Tromey
2021-01-04 12:05 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-02-10 0:56 ` Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 053/203] Split out eval_op_m2_subscript Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 054/203] Split out eval_binop_assign_modify Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 056/203] Split out eval_opencl_assign Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 057/203] Split out eval_ternop_in_range Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 058/203] Split out ada_unop_neg Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 059/203] Split out ada_unop_in_range Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 060/203] Split out ada_atr_tag Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 061/203] Split out ada_atr_size Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 062/203] Split out ada_abs Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 063/203] Split out ada_mult_binop Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 064/203] Split out ada_equal_binop Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 065/203] Split out ada_ternop_slice Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 066/203] Split out ada_binop_in_bounds Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 067/203] Split out ada_unop_atr Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 068/203] Split out ada_binop_minmax Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 069/203] Change value_val_atr to ada_val_atr Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 070/203] Split out ada_binop_exp Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 071/203] Split out eval_multi_subscript Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 072/203] Split gen_expr_binop_rest Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 073/203] Introduce class operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-03 7:09 ` Joel Brobecker
2021-01-03 13:55 ` Lancelot SIX via Gdb-patches
2021-02-10 0:57 ` Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 074/203] Implement dumping Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 075/203] Add two agent expression helper functions Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 076/203] Introduce float_const_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 077/203] Introduce scope_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 078/203] Introduce long_const_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 079/203] Introduce var_msym_value_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 080/203] Introduce var_entry_value_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 081/203] Introduce func_static_var_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 082/203] Introduce last_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 083/203] Introduce register_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 084/203] Introduce bool_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 085/203] Introduce internalvar_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 086/203] Introduce string_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 087/203] Introduce ternop_slice_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 088/203] Introduce ternop_cond_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 089/203] Add c-exp.h and c_string_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 090/203] Introduce objc_nsstring_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 091/203] Introduce objc_selector_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 092/203] Introduce complex_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 093/203] Introduce structop_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 094/203] Introduce structop_ptr_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 095/203] Introduce structop_member_operation and structop_mptr_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 096/203] Introduce concat_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 097/203] Introduce add_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 098/203] Introduce sub_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 099/203] Introduce binop_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 100/203] Introduce subscript_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 101/203] Implement binary comparison operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 102/203] Introduce repeat_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 103/203] Introduce comma_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 104/203] Implement some unary operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 105/203] Implement unary increment and decrement operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 106/203] Introduce unop_ind_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 107/203] Introduce type_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 108/203] Introduce typeof_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 109/203] Introduce decltype_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 110/203] Introduce typeid_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 111/203] Introduce unop_addr_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 112/203] Introduce unop_sizeof_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 113/203] Introduce unop_alignof_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 114/203] Implement UNOP_MEMVAL and UNOP_MEMVAL_TYPE Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 115/203] Introduce op_this_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 116/203] Introduce type_instance_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 117/203] Introduce assign_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 118/203] Introduce assign_modify_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 119/203] Introduce unop_cast_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 120/203] Introduce unop_cast_type_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 121/203] Implement C++ cast operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 122/203] Introduce var_value_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 123/203] Introduce objc_msgcall_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 124/203] Introduce multi_subscript_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 125/203] Introduce ada_wrapped_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 126/203] Introduce ada_string_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 127/203] Introduce ada_qual_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 128/203] Introduce ada_ternop_range_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 129/203] Implement several Fortran operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 130/203] Implement some Rust operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 131/203] Introduce rust_unop_ind_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 132/203] Introduce rust_subscript_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 133/203] Introduce rust_range_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 134/203] Implement Rust field operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 135/203] Introduce rust_aggregate_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 136/203] Add two simple Modula-2 operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-07 15:16 ` Gaius Mulley via Gdb-patches
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 137/203] Implement the "&&" and "||" operators Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 138/203] Implement some Ada unary operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 139/203] Introduce ada_unop_range_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 140/203] Introduce class adl_func_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 141/203] Introduce array_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 142/203] Implement function call operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 143/203] Implement Rust funcall operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 144/203] Introduce fortran_undetermined Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 145/203] Introduce opencl_cast_type_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 146/203] Implement OpenCL binary operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 147/203] Introduce opencl_notequal_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 148/203] Introduce opencl_structop_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 149/203] Implement OpenCL logical binary operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 150/203] Implement OpenCL ternary conditional operator Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 151/203] Split out some Ada type resolution code Tom Tromey
2021-01-03 7:46 ` Joel Brobecker
2021-02-13 19:47 ` Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 152/203] Introduce ada_binop_addsub_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 153/203] Implement Ada multiplicative operators Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 154/203] Implement Ada equality operators Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 155/203] Introduce ada_bitwise_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 156/203] Introduce ada_ternop_slice Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 157/203] Introduce ada_binop_in_bounds Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 158/203] Implement some Ada OP_ATR_ operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 159/203] Introduce ada_var_value_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 160/203] Introduce ada_var_msym_value_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 161/203] Implement Ada min and max operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 162/203] Refactor value_pos_atr Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 163/203] Introduce ada_pos_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 164/203] Introduce ada_atr_val_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 165/203] Introduce ada_binop_exp_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 166/203] Introduce ada_unop_ind_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 167/203] Introduce ada_structop_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 168/203] Implement function calls for Ada Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 169/203] Implement Ada resolution Tom Tromey
2021-01-03 7:57 ` Joel Brobecker
2021-02-13 19:49 ` Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 170/203] Implement Ada assignment Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 171/203] Remove use of op_string Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 172/203] Add an expr::operation_up to struct expression Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 173/203] Add completion for operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 174/203] Add operation-related methods to parser_state Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 175/203] Convert dtrace probes to use operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 176/203] Convert stap probes to create operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 177/203] Convert rust-exp.y to use operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 178/203] Convert c-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 179/203] Convert go-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 180/203] Convert d-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 181/203] Convert p-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 182/203] Convert m2-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 183/203] Convert f-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 184/203] Convert ada-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 185/203] Remove now-unused Rust evaluator code Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 186/203] Remove now-unused Fortran " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 187/203] Remove now-unused Modula-2 " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 188/203] Remove now-unused Ada " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 189/203] Remove now-unused C " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 190/203] Remove union exp_element Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 191/203] Remove two Ada opcodes Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 192/203] Remove unused Modula-2 opcodes Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 193/203] Remove unused Ada opcodes Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 194/203] Remove OP_EXTENDED0 Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 195/203] Remove OP_UNUSED_LAST Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 196/203] Remove BINOP_END Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 197/203] Inline expression constructor Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 198/203] Inline expr_builder methods Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 199/203] Merge namespace scopes in eval.c Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 200/203] Remove EVAL_SKIP Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 201/203] Change exp_uses_objfile to return bool Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 202/203] Use bound_minimal_symbol in var_msym_value_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 203/203] Remove some null checks Tom Tromey
2021-01-03 7:02 ` [PATCH 000/203] Refactor expressions Joel Brobecker
2021-01-04 12:16 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-02-13 19:54 ` Tom Tromey
2021-02-16 16:17 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210101214723.1784144-56-tom@tromey.com \
--to=tom@tromey.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox