Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH 055/203] Split out eval_op_objc_msgcall
Date: Fri,  1 Jan 2021 14:44:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210101214723.1784144-56-tom@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210101214723.1784144-1-tom@tromey.com>

This splits OP_OBJC_MSGCALL into a new function for future use.

gdb/ChangeLog
2021-01-01  Tom Tromey  <tom@tromey.com>

	* eval.c (eval_op_objc_msgcall): New function.
	(evaluate_subexp_standard): Use it.
---
 gdb/ChangeLog |   5 +
 gdb/eval.c    | 530 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 2 files changed, 286 insertions(+), 249 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/eval.c b/gdb/eval.c
index b0d2a217ee5..8af14fc723b 100644
--- a/gdb/eval.c
+++ b/gdb/eval.c
@@ -2064,6 +2064,277 @@ eval_binop_assign_modify (struct type *expect_type, struct expression *exp,
   return value_assign (arg1, arg2);
 }
 
+/* Note that ARGS needs 2 empty slots up front and must end with a
+   null pointer.  */
+static struct value *
+eval_op_objc_msgcall (struct type *expect_type, struct expression *exp,
+		      enum noside noside, CORE_ADDR selector,
+		      value *target, gdb::array_view<value *> args)
+{
+  CORE_ADDR responds_selector = 0;
+  CORE_ADDR method_selector = 0;
+
+  int struct_return = 0;
+
+  struct value *msg_send = NULL;
+  struct value *msg_send_stret = NULL;
+  int gnu_runtime = 0;
+
+  struct value *method = NULL;
+  struct value *called_method = NULL;
+
+  struct type *selector_type = NULL;
+  struct type *long_type;
+  struct type *type;
+
+  struct value *ret = NULL;
+  CORE_ADDR addr = 0;
+
+  value *argvec[5];
+
+  long_type = builtin_type (exp->gdbarch)->builtin_long;
+  selector_type = builtin_type (exp->gdbarch)->builtin_data_ptr;
+
+  if (value_as_long (target) == 0)
+    return value_from_longest (long_type, 0);
+
+  if (lookup_minimal_symbol ("objc_msg_lookup", 0, 0).minsym)
+    gnu_runtime = 1;
+
+  /* Find the method dispatch (Apple runtime) or method lookup
+     (GNU runtime) function for Objective-C.  These will be used
+     to lookup the symbol information for the method.  If we
+     can't find any symbol information, then we'll use these to
+     call the method, otherwise we can call the method
+     directly.  The msg_send_stret function is used in the special
+     case of a method that returns a structure (Apple runtime
+     only).  */
+  if (gnu_runtime)
+    {
+      type = selector_type;
+
+      type = lookup_function_type (type);
+      type = lookup_pointer_type (type);
+      type = lookup_function_type (type);
+      type = lookup_pointer_type (type);
+
+      msg_send = find_function_in_inferior ("objc_msg_lookup", NULL);
+      msg_send_stret
+	= find_function_in_inferior ("objc_msg_lookup", NULL);
+
+      msg_send = value_from_pointer (type, value_as_address (msg_send));
+      msg_send_stret = value_from_pointer (type,
+					   value_as_address (msg_send_stret));
+    }
+  else
+    {
+      msg_send = find_function_in_inferior ("objc_msgSend", NULL);
+      /* Special dispatcher for methods returning structs.  */
+      msg_send_stret
+	= find_function_in_inferior ("objc_msgSend_stret", NULL);
+    }
+
+  /* Verify the target object responds to this method.  The
+     standard top-level 'Object' class uses a different name for
+     the verification method than the non-standard, but more
+     often used, 'NSObject' class.  Make sure we check for both.  */
+
+  responds_selector
+    = lookup_child_selector (exp->gdbarch, "respondsToSelector:");
+  if (responds_selector == 0)
+    responds_selector
+      = lookup_child_selector (exp->gdbarch, "respondsTo:");
+
+  if (responds_selector == 0)
+    error (_("no 'respondsTo:' or 'respondsToSelector:' method"));
+
+  method_selector
+    = lookup_child_selector (exp->gdbarch, "methodForSelector:");
+  if (method_selector == 0)
+    method_selector
+      = lookup_child_selector (exp->gdbarch, "methodFor:");
+
+  if (method_selector == 0)
+    error (_("no 'methodFor:' or 'methodForSelector:' method"));
+
+  /* Call the verification method, to make sure that the target
+     class implements the desired method.  */
+
+  argvec[0] = msg_send;
+  argvec[1] = target;
+  argvec[2] = value_from_longest (long_type, responds_selector);
+  argvec[3] = value_from_longest (long_type, selector);
+  argvec[4] = 0;
+
+  ret = call_function_by_hand (argvec[0], NULL, {argvec + 1, 3});
+  if (gnu_runtime)
+    {
+      /* Function objc_msg_lookup returns a pointer.  */
+      argvec[0] = ret;
+      ret = call_function_by_hand (argvec[0], NULL, {argvec + 1, 3});
+    }
+  if (value_as_long (ret) == 0)
+    error (_("Target does not respond to this message selector."));
+
+  /* Call "methodForSelector:" method, to get the address of a
+     function method that implements this selector for this
+     class.  If we can find a symbol at that address, then we
+     know the return type, parameter types etc.  (that's a good
+     thing).  */
+
+  argvec[0] = msg_send;
+  argvec[1] = target;
+  argvec[2] = value_from_longest (long_type, method_selector);
+  argvec[3] = value_from_longest (long_type, selector);
+  argvec[4] = 0;
+
+  ret = call_function_by_hand (argvec[0], NULL, {argvec + 1, 3});
+  if (gnu_runtime)
+    {
+      argvec[0] = ret;
+      ret = call_function_by_hand (argvec[0], NULL, {argvec + 1, 3});
+    }
+
+  /* ret should now be the selector.  */
+
+  addr = value_as_long (ret);
+  if (addr)
+    {
+      struct symbol *sym = NULL;
+
+      /* The address might point to a function descriptor;
+	 resolve it to the actual code address instead.  */
+      addr = gdbarch_convert_from_func_ptr_addr (exp->gdbarch, addr,
+						 current_top_target ());
+
+      /* Is it a high_level symbol?  */
+      sym = find_pc_function (addr);
+      if (sym != NULL)
+	method = value_of_variable (sym, 0);
+    }
+
+  /* If we found a method with symbol information, check to see
+     if it returns a struct.  Otherwise assume it doesn't.  */
+
+  if (method)
+    {
+      CORE_ADDR funaddr;
+      struct type *val_type;
+
+      funaddr = find_function_addr (method, &val_type);
+
+      block_for_pc (funaddr);
+
+      val_type = check_typedef (val_type);
+
+      if ((val_type == NULL)
+	  || (val_type->code () == TYPE_CODE_ERROR))
+	{
+	  if (expect_type != NULL)
+	    val_type = expect_type;
+	}
+
+      struct_return = using_struct_return (exp->gdbarch, method,
+					   val_type);
+    }
+  else if (expect_type != NULL)
+    {
+      struct_return = using_struct_return (exp->gdbarch, NULL,
+					   check_typedef (expect_type));
+    }
+
+  /* Found a function symbol.  Now we will substitute its
+     value in place of the message dispatcher (obj_msgSend),
+     so that we call the method directly instead of thru
+     the dispatcher.  The main reason for doing this is that
+     we can now evaluate the return value and parameter values
+     according to their known data types, in case we need to
+     do things like promotion, dereferencing, special handling
+     of structs and doubles, etc.
+
+     We want to use the type signature of 'method', but still
+     jump to objc_msgSend() or objc_msgSend_stret() to better
+     mimic the behavior of the runtime.  */
+
+  if (method)
+    {
+      if (value_type (method)->code () != TYPE_CODE_FUNC)
+	error (_("method address has symbol information "
+		 "with non-function type; skipping"));
+
+      /* Create a function pointer of the appropriate type, and
+	 replace its value with the value of msg_send or
+	 msg_send_stret.  We must use a pointer here, as
+	 msg_send and msg_send_stret are of pointer type, and
+	 the representation may be different on systems that use
+	 function descriptors.  */
+      if (struct_return)
+	called_method
+	  = value_from_pointer (lookup_pointer_type (value_type (method)),
+				value_as_address (msg_send_stret));
+      else
+	called_method
+	  = value_from_pointer (lookup_pointer_type (value_type (method)),
+				value_as_address (msg_send));
+    }
+  else
+    {
+      if (struct_return)
+	called_method = msg_send_stret;
+      else
+	called_method = msg_send;
+    }
+
+  if (noside == EVAL_SKIP)
+    return eval_skip_value (exp);
+
+  if (noside == EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS)
+    {
+      /* If the return type doesn't look like a function type,
+	 call an error.  This can happen if somebody tries to
+	 turn a variable into a function call.  This is here
+	 because people often want to call, eg, strcmp, which
+	 gdb doesn't know is a function.  If gdb isn't asked for
+	 it's opinion (ie. through "whatis"), it won't offer
+	 it.  */
+
+      struct type *callee_type = value_type (called_method);
+
+      if (callee_type && callee_type->code () == TYPE_CODE_PTR)
+	callee_type = TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (callee_type);
+      callee_type = TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (callee_type);
+
+      if (callee_type)
+	{
+	  if ((callee_type->code () == TYPE_CODE_ERROR) && expect_type)
+	    return allocate_value (expect_type);
+	  else
+	    return allocate_value (callee_type);
+	}
+      else
+	error (_("Expression of type other than "
+		 "\"method returning ...\" used as a method"));
+    }
+
+  /* Now depending on whether we found a symbol for the method,
+     we will either call the runtime dispatcher or the method
+     directly.  */
+
+  args[0] = target;
+  args[1] = value_from_longest (long_type, selector);
+
+  if (gnu_runtime && (method != NULL))
+    {
+      /* Function objc_msg_lookup returns a pointer.  */
+      struct type *tem_type = value_type (called_method);
+      tem_type = lookup_pointer_type (lookup_function_type (tem_type));
+      deprecated_set_value_type (called_method, tem_type);
+      called_method = call_function_by_hand (called_method, NULL, args);
+    }
+
+  return call_function_by_hand (called_method, NULL, args);
+}
+
 struct value *
 evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *expect_type,
 			  struct expression *exp, int *pos,
@@ -2351,36 +2622,20 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *expect_type,
 
     case OP_OBJC_MSGCALL:
       {				/* Objective C message (method) call.  */
-
-	CORE_ADDR responds_selector = 0;
-	CORE_ADDR method_selector = 0;
-
 	CORE_ADDR selector = 0;
 
-	int struct_return = 0;
 	enum noside sub_no_side = EVAL_NORMAL;
 
-	struct value *msg_send = NULL;
-	struct value *msg_send_stret = NULL;
-	int gnu_runtime = 0;
-
 	struct value *target = NULL;
-	struct value *method = NULL;
-	struct value *called_method = NULL; 
 
 	struct type *selector_type = NULL;
-	struct type *long_type;
-
-	struct value *ret = NULL;
-	CORE_ADDR addr = 0;
 
 	selector = exp->elts[pc + 1].longconst;
 	nargs = exp->elts[pc + 2].longconst;
-	argvec = XALLOCAVEC (struct value *, nargs + 5);
+	argvec = XALLOCAVEC (struct value *, nargs + 3);
 
 	(*pos) += 3;
 
-	long_type = builtin_type (exp->gdbarch)->builtin_long;
 	selector_type = builtin_type (exp->gdbarch)->builtin_data_ptr;
 
 	if (noside == EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS)
@@ -2391,249 +2646,26 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *expect_type,
 	target = evaluate_subexp (selector_type, exp, pos, sub_no_side);
 
 	if (value_as_long (target) == 0)
- 	  return value_from_longest (long_type, 0);
-	
-	if (lookup_minimal_symbol ("objc_msg_lookup", 0, 0).minsym)
-	  gnu_runtime = 1;
-	
-	/* Find the method dispatch (Apple runtime) or method lookup
-	   (GNU runtime) function for Objective-C.  These will be used
-	   to lookup the symbol information for the method.  If we
-	   can't find any symbol information, then we'll use these to
-	   call the method, otherwise we can call the method
-	   directly.  The msg_send_stret function is used in the special
-	   case of a method that returns a structure (Apple runtime 
-	   only).  */
-	if (gnu_runtime)
-	  {
-	    type = selector_type;
-
-	    type = lookup_function_type (type);
-	    type = lookup_pointer_type (type);
-	    type = lookup_function_type (type);
-	    type = lookup_pointer_type (type);
-
-	    msg_send = find_function_in_inferior ("objc_msg_lookup", NULL);
-	    msg_send_stret
-	      = find_function_in_inferior ("objc_msg_lookup", NULL);
-
-	    msg_send = value_from_pointer (type, value_as_address (msg_send));
-	    msg_send_stret = value_from_pointer (type, 
-					value_as_address (msg_send_stret));
-	  }
+	  sub_no_side = EVAL_SKIP;
 	else
-	  {
-	    msg_send = find_function_in_inferior ("objc_msgSend", NULL);
-	    /* Special dispatcher for methods returning structs.  */
-	    msg_send_stret
-	      = find_function_in_inferior ("objc_msgSend_stret", NULL);
-	  }
-
-	/* Verify the target object responds to this method.  The
-	   standard top-level 'Object' class uses a different name for
-	   the verification method than the non-standard, but more
-	   often used, 'NSObject' class.  Make sure we check for both.  */
-
-	responds_selector
-	  = lookup_child_selector (exp->gdbarch, "respondsToSelector:");
-	if (responds_selector == 0)
-	  responds_selector
-	    = lookup_child_selector (exp->gdbarch, "respondsTo:");
-	
-	if (responds_selector == 0)
-	  error (_("no 'respondsTo:' or 'respondsToSelector:' method"));
-	
-	method_selector
-	  = lookup_child_selector (exp->gdbarch, "methodForSelector:");
-	if (method_selector == 0)
-	  method_selector
-	    = lookup_child_selector (exp->gdbarch, "methodFor:");
-	
-	if (method_selector == 0)
-	  error (_("no 'methodFor:' or 'methodForSelector:' method"));
-
-	/* Call the verification method, to make sure that the target
-	 class implements the desired method.  */
-
-	argvec[0] = msg_send;
-	argvec[1] = target;
-	argvec[2] = value_from_longest (long_type, responds_selector);
-	argvec[3] = value_from_longest (long_type, selector);
-	argvec[4] = 0;
-
-	ret = call_function_by_hand (argvec[0], NULL, {argvec + 1, 3});
-	if (gnu_runtime)
-	  {
-	    /* Function objc_msg_lookup returns a pointer.  */
-	    argvec[0] = ret;
-	    ret = call_function_by_hand (argvec[0], NULL, {argvec + 1, 3});
-	  }
-	if (value_as_long (ret) == 0)
-	  error (_("Target does not respond to this message selector."));
-
-	/* Call "methodForSelector:" method, to get the address of a
-	   function method that implements this selector for this
-	   class.  If we can find a symbol at that address, then we
-	   know the return type, parameter types etc.  (that's a good
-	   thing).  */
-
-	argvec[0] = msg_send;
-	argvec[1] = target;
-	argvec[2] = value_from_longest (long_type, method_selector);
-	argvec[3] = value_from_longest (long_type, selector);
-	argvec[4] = 0;
-
-	ret = call_function_by_hand (argvec[0], NULL, {argvec + 1, 3});
-	if (gnu_runtime)
-	  {
-	    argvec[0] = ret;
-	    ret = call_function_by_hand (argvec[0], NULL, {argvec + 1, 3});
-	  }
-
-	/* ret should now be the selector.  */
-
-	addr = value_as_long (ret);
-	if (addr)
-	  {
-	    struct symbol *sym = NULL;
-
-	    /* The address might point to a function descriptor;
-	       resolve it to the actual code address instead.  */
-	    addr = gdbarch_convert_from_func_ptr_addr (exp->gdbarch, addr,
-						       current_top_target ());
-
-	    /* Is it a high_level symbol?  */
-	    sym = find_pc_function (addr);
-	    if (sym != NULL) 
-	      method = value_of_variable (sym, 0);
-	  }
-
-	/* If we found a method with symbol information, check to see
-	   if it returns a struct.  Otherwise assume it doesn't.  */
-
-	if (method)
-	  {
-	    CORE_ADDR funaddr;
-	    struct type *val_type;
-
-	    funaddr = find_function_addr (method, &val_type);
-
-	    block_for_pc (funaddr);
-
-	    val_type = check_typedef (val_type);
-
-	    if ((val_type == NULL)
-		|| (val_type->code () == TYPE_CODE_ERROR))
-	      {
-		if (expect_type != NULL)
-		  val_type = expect_type;
-	      }
-
-	    struct_return = using_struct_return (exp->gdbarch, method,
-						 val_type);
-	  }
-	else if (expect_type != NULL)
-	  {
-	    struct_return = using_struct_return (exp->gdbarch, NULL,
-						 check_typedef (expect_type));
-	  }
-
-	/* Found a function symbol.  Now we will substitute its
-	   value in place of the message dispatcher (obj_msgSend),
-	   so that we call the method directly instead of thru
-	   the dispatcher.  The main reason for doing this is that
-	   we can now evaluate the return value and parameter values
-	   according to their known data types, in case we need to
-	   do things like promotion, dereferencing, special handling
-	   of structs and doubles, etc.
-	  
-	   We want to use the type signature of 'method', but still
-	   jump to objc_msgSend() or objc_msgSend_stret() to better
-	   mimic the behavior of the runtime.  */
-	
-	if (method)
-	  {
-	    if (value_type (method)->code () != TYPE_CODE_FUNC)
-	      error (_("method address has symbol information "
-		       "with non-function type; skipping"));
-
-	    /* Create a function pointer of the appropriate type, and
-	       replace its value with the value of msg_send or
-	       msg_send_stret.  We must use a pointer here, as
-	       msg_send and msg_send_stret are of pointer type, and
-	       the representation may be different on systems that use
-	       function descriptors.  */
-	    if (struct_return)
-	      called_method
-		= value_from_pointer (lookup_pointer_type (value_type (method)),
-				      value_as_address (msg_send_stret));
-	    else
-	      called_method
-		= value_from_pointer (lookup_pointer_type (value_type (method)),
-				      value_as_address (msg_send));
-	  }
-	else
-	  {
-	    if (struct_return)
-	      called_method = msg_send_stret;
-	    else
-	      called_method = msg_send;
-	  }
-
-	if (noside == EVAL_SKIP)
-	  return eval_skip_value (exp);
-
-	if (noside == EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS)
-	  {
-	    /* If the return type doesn't look like a function type,
-	       call an error.  This can happen if somebody tries to
-	       turn a variable into a function call.  This is here
-	       because people often want to call, eg, strcmp, which
-	       gdb doesn't know is a function.  If gdb isn't asked for
-	       it's opinion (ie. through "whatis"), it won't offer
-	       it.  */
-
-	    struct type *callee_type = value_type (called_method);
-
-	    if (callee_type && callee_type->code () == TYPE_CODE_PTR)
-	      callee_type = TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (callee_type);
-	    callee_type = TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (callee_type);
-
-	    if (callee_type)
-	    {
-	      if ((callee_type->code () == TYPE_CODE_ERROR) && expect_type)
-		return allocate_value (expect_type);
-	      else
-		return allocate_value (callee_type);
-	    }
-	    else
-	      error (_("Expression of type other than "
-		       "\"method returning ...\" used as a method"));
-	  }
+	  sub_no_side = noside;
 
 	/* Now depending on whether we found a symbol for the method,
 	   we will either call the runtime dispatcher or the method
 	   directly.  */
 
-	argvec[0] = called_method;
-	argvec[1] = target;
-	argvec[2] = value_from_longest (long_type, selector);
+	argvec[0] = nullptr;
+	argvec[1] = nullptr;
 	/* User-supplied arguments.  */
 	for (tem = 0; tem < nargs; tem++)
-	  argvec[tem + 3] = evaluate_subexp_with_coercion (exp, pos, noside);
+	  argvec[tem + 2] = evaluate_subexp_with_coercion (exp, pos,
+							   sub_no_side);
 	argvec[tem + 3] = 0;
 
-	auto call_args = gdb::make_array_view (argvec + 1, nargs + 2);
-
-	if (gnu_runtime && (method != NULL))
-	  {
-	    /* Function objc_msg_lookup returns a pointer.  */
-	    deprecated_set_value_type (argvec[0],
-				       lookup_pointer_type (lookup_function_type (value_type (argvec[0]))));
-	    argvec[0] = call_function_by_hand (argvec[0], NULL, call_args);
-	  }
+	auto call_args = gdb::make_array_view (argvec, nargs + 3);
 
-	return call_function_by_hand (argvec[0], NULL, call_args);
+	return eval_op_objc_msgcall (expect_type, exp, noside, selector,
+				     target, call_args);
       }
       break;
 
-- 
2.26.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-01 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 225+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-01 21:44 [PATCH 000/203] Refactor expressions Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 001/203] Split out eval_op_scope Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 002/203] Split out eval_op_var_entry_value Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 003/203] Split out eval_op_var_msym_value Tom Tromey
2021-01-04 11:43   ` Andrew Burgess
2021-02-13 19:37     ` Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 004/203] Split out eval_op_func_static_var Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 005/203] Split out eval_op_register Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 006/203] Split out eval_op_string Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 007/203] Split out eval_op_objc_selector Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 008/203] Split out eval_op_concat Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 009/203] what is this code for Tom Tromey
2021-01-03  6:00   ` Joel Brobecker
2021-01-25  2:28     ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-25  3:27       ` Tom Tromey
2021-02-11  2:25       ` Tom Tromey
2021-02-13 19:37         ` Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 010/203] Split out eval_op_ternop Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 011/203] Split out eval_op_structop_struct Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 012/203] Split out eval_op_structop_ptr Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 013/203] Split out eval_op_member Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 014/203] Split out eval_op_add Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 015/203] Split out eval_op_sub Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 016/203] Split out eval_op_binary Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 017/203] Split out eval_op_subscript Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 018/203] Split out eval_op_equal Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 019/203] Split out eval_op_notequal Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 020/203] Split out eval_op_less Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 021/203] Split out eval_op_gtr Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 022/203] Split out eval_op_geq Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 023/203] Split out eval_op_leq Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 024/203] Split out eval_op_repeat Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 025/203] Split out eval_op_plus Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 026/203] Split out eval_op_neg Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 027/203] Split out eval_op_complement Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 028/203] Split out eval_op_lognot Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 029/203] Split out eval_op_ind Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 030/203] Split out eval_op_alignof Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 031/203] Split out eval_op_memval Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 032/203] Split out eval_op_preinc Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 033/203] Split out eval_op_predec Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 034/203] Split out eval_op_postinc Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 035/203] Split out eval_op_postdec Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 036/203] Split out eval_op_type Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 037/203] Split out eval_op_f_abs Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 038/203] Split out eval_op_f_mod Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 039/203] Split out eval_op_f_ceil Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 040/203] Split out eval_op_f_floor Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 041/203] Split out eval_op_f_modulo Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 042/203] Split out eval_op_f_cmplx Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 043/203] Split out eval_op_f_kind Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 044/203] Change parameters to rust_range Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 045/203] Change parameters to rust_subscript Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 046/203] Split out eval_op_rust_ind Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 047/203] Split out eval_op_rust_complement Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 048/203] Split out eval_op_rust_array Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 049/203] Split out eval_op_rust_struct_anon Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 050/203] Split out eval_op_rust_structop Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 051/203] Split helper functions Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 052/203] Split out eval_op_m2_high Tom Tromey
2021-01-04 12:05   ` Andrew Burgess
2021-02-10  0:56     ` Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 053/203] Split out eval_op_m2_subscript Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 054/203] Split out eval_binop_assign_modify Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 056/203] Split out eval_opencl_assign Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 057/203] Split out eval_ternop_in_range Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 058/203] Split out ada_unop_neg Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 059/203] Split out ada_unop_in_range Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 060/203] Split out ada_atr_tag Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 061/203] Split out ada_atr_size Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 062/203] Split out ada_abs Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 063/203] Split out ada_mult_binop Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 064/203] Split out ada_equal_binop Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 065/203] Split out ada_ternop_slice Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 066/203] Split out ada_binop_in_bounds Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 067/203] Split out ada_unop_atr Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 068/203] Split out ada_binop_minmax Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 069/203] Change value_val_atr to ada_val_atr Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 070/203] Split out ada_binop_exp Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 071/203] Split out eval_multi_subscript Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 072/203] Split gen_expr_binop_rest Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 073/203] Introduce class operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-03  7:09   ` Joel Brobecker
2021-01-03 13:55     ` Lancelot SIX via Gdb-patches
2021-02-10  0:57       ` Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 074/203] Implement dumping Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 075/203] Add two agent expression helper functions Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 076/203] Introduce float_const_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 077/203] Introduce scope_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 078/203] Introduce long_const_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 079/203] Introduce var_msym_value_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 080/203] Introduce var_entry_value_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 081/203] Introduce func_static_var_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 082/203] Introduce last_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 083/203] Introduce register_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 084/203] Introduce bool_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 085/203] Introduce internalvar_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 086/203] Introduce string_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 087/203] Introduce ternop_slice_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 088/203] Introduce ternop_cond_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 089/203] Add c-exp.h and c_string_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 090/203] Introduce objc_nsstring_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 091/203] Introduce objc_selector_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 092/203] Introduce complex_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 093/203] Introduce structop_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 094/203] Introduce structop_ptr_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 095/203] Introduce structop_member_operation and structop_mptr_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 096/203] Introduce concat_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 097/203] Introduce add_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 098/203] Introduce sub_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 099/203] Introduce binop_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 100/203] Introduce subscript_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 101/203] Implement binary comparison operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 102/203] Introduce repeat_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 103/203] Introduce comma_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 104/203] Implement some unary operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 105/203] Implement unary increment and decrement operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 106/203] Introduce unop_ind_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 107/203] Introduce type_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 108/203] Introduce typeof_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 109/203] Introduce decltype_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 110/203] Introduce typeid_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 111/203] Introduce unop_addr_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 112/203] Introduce unop_sizeof_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 113/203] Introduce unop_alignof_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 114/203] Implement UNOP_MEMVAL and UNOP_MEMVAL_TYPE Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 115/203] Introduce op_this_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 116/203] Introduce type_instance_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 117/203] Introduce assign_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 118/203] Introduce assign_modify_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 119/203] Introduce unop_cast_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 120/203] Introduce unop_cast_type_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 121/203] Implement C++ cast operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 122/203] Introduce var_value_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 123/203] Introduce objc_msgcall_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 124/203] Introduce multi_subscript_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 125/203] Introduce ada_wrapped_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 126/203] Introduce ada_string_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 127/203] Introduce ada_qual_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 128/203] Introduce ada_ternop_range_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 129/203] Implement several Fortran operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 130/203] Implement some Rust operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 131/203] Introduce rust_unop_ind_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 132/203] Introduce rust_subscript_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 133/203] Introduce rust_range_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 134/203] Implement Rust field operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 135/203] Introduce rust_aggregate_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 136/203] Add two simple Modula-2 operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-07 15:16   ` Gaius Mulley via Gdb-patches
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 137/203] Implement the "&&" and "||" operators Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 138/203] Implement some Ada unary operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 139/203] Introduce ada_unop_range_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 140/203] Introduce class adl_func_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 141/203] Introduce array_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 142/203] Implement function call operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 143/203] Implement Rust funcall operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 144/203] Introduce fortran_undetermined Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 145/203] Introduce opencl_cast_type_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 146/203] Implement OpenCL binary operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 147/203] Introduce opencl_notequal_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 148/203] Introduce opencl_structop_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 149/203] Implement OpenCL logical binary operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 150/203] Implement OpenCL ternary conditional operator Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 151/203] Split out some Ada type resolution code Tom Tromey
2021-01-03  7:46   ` Joel Brobecker
2021-02-13 19:47     ` Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 152/203] Introduce ada_binop_addsub_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 153/203] Implement Ada multiplicative operators Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 154/203] Implement Ada equality operators Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 155/203] Introduce ada_bitwise_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 156/203] Introduce ada_ternop_slice Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 157/203] Introduce ada_binop_in_bounds Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 158/203] Implement some Ada OP_ATR_ operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 159/203] Introduce ada_var_value_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 160/203] Introduce ada_var_msym_value_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 161/203] Implement Ada min and max operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 162/203] Refactor value_pos_atr Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 163/203] Introduce ada_pos_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 164/203] Introduce ada_atr_val_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 165/203] Introduce ada_binop_exp_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 166/203] Introduce ada_unop_ind_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 167/203] Introduce ada_structop_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 168/203] Implement function calls for Ada Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 169/203] Implement Ada resolution Tom Tromey
2021-01-03  7:57   ` Joel Brobecker
2021-02-13 19:49     ` Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 170/203] Implement Ada assignment Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 171/203] Remove use of op_string Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 172/203] Add an expr::operation_up to struct expression Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 173/203] Add completion for operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 174/203] Add operation-related methods to parser_state Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 175/203] Convert dtrace probes to use operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 176/203] Convert stap probes to create operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 177/203] Convert rust-exp.y to use operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 178/203] Convert c-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 179/203] Convert go-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 180/203] Convert d-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 181/203] Convert p-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 182/203] Convert m2-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 183/203] Convert f-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 184/203] Convert ada-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 185/203] Remove now-unused Rust evaluator code Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 186/203] Remove now-unused Fortran " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 187/203] Remove now-unused Modula-2 " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 188/203] Remove now-unused Ada " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 189/203] Remove now-unused C " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 190/203] Remove union exp_element Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 191/203] Remove two Ada opcodes Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 192/203] Remove unused Modula-2 opcodes Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 193/203] Remove unused Ada opcodes Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 194/203] Remove OP_EXTENDED0 Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 195/203] Remove OP_UNUSED_LAST Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 196/203] Remove BINOP_END Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 197/203] Inline expression constructor Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 198/203] Inline expr_builder methods Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 199/203] Merge namespace scopes in eval.c Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 200/203] Remove EVAL_SKIP Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 201/203] Change exp_uses_objfile to return bool Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 202/203] Use bound_minimal_symbol in var_msym_value_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 203/203] Remove some null checks Tom Tromey
2021-01-03  7:02 ` [PATCH 000/203] Refactor expressions Joel Brobecker
2021-01-04 12:16   ` Andrew Burgess
2021-02-13 19:54   ` Tom Tromey
2021-02-16 16:17     ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210101214723.1784144-56-tom@tromey.com \
    --to=tom@tromey.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox