From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH 142/203] Implement function call operations
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2021 14:46:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210101214723.1784144-143-tom@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210101214723.1784144-1-tom@tromey.com>
This implement function call operations.
The current function call code relies on some very lengthy code
(evaluate_funcall is 398 lines...) to distinguish between the
different opcodes that might appear in the callee position.
Rather than try to replicate this, and have a function that tried to
dissect many different kinds of operation subclass, this patch instead
puts the work into the callee. A new operation::evaluate_funcall
method is added, and then this is overridden in the classes that
require special treatment.
gdb/ChangeLog
2021-01-01 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
* expression.h (class operation) <evaluate_funcall>: New method.
* expop.h (class scope_operation) <evaluate_funcall>: New method.
(class var_value_operation) <evaluate_funcall>: New method.
(class structop_base_operation) <evaluate_funcall>: New method.
(class structop_member_base): New class.
(class structop_member_operation): Derive from
structop_member_base.
(class structop_mptr_operation): Derive from
structop_member_base.
(class funcall_operation): New class.
* eval.c (operation::evaluate_funcall)
(var_value_operation::evaluate_funcall)
(scope_operation::evaluate_funcall)
(structop_member_base::evaluate_funcall)
(structop_base_operation::evaluate_funcall): New methods.
---
gdb/ChangeLog | 18 +++
gdb/eval.c | 279 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
gdb/expop.h | 55 +++++++++-
gdb/expression.h | 9 ++
4 files changed, 358 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/eval.c b/gdb/eval.c
index 2589e35ae30..ff3c58cd4a8 100644
--- a/gdb/eval.c
+++ b/gdb/eval.c
@@ -1202,6 +1202,285 @@ evaluate_funcall (type *expect_type, expression *exp, int *pos,
var_func_name, expect_type);
}
+namespace expr
+{
+
+value *
+operation::evaluate_funcall (struct type *expect_type,
+ struct expression *exp,
+ enum noside noside,
+ const std::vector<operation_up> &args)
+{
+ std::vector<value *> vals (args.size ());
+
+ value *callee = evaluate_with_coercion (exp, noside);
+ for (int i = 0; i < args.size (); ++i)
+ vals[i] = args[i]->evaluate_with_coercion (exp, noside);
+
+ return evaluate_subexp_do_call (exp, noside, callee, vals,
+ nullptr, expect_type);
+}
+
+value *
+var_value_operation::evaluate_funcall (struct type *expect_type,
+ struct expression *exp,
+ enum noside noside,
+ const std::vector<operation_up> &args)
+{
+ if (!overload_resolution
+ || exp->language_defn->la_language != language_cplus)
+ return operation::evaluate_funcall (expect_type, exp, noside, args);
+
+ std::vector<value *> argvec (args.size ());
+ for (int i = 0; i < args.size (); ++i)
+ argvec[i] = args[i]->evaluate_with_coercion (exp, noside);
+
+ struct symbol *symp;
+ find_overload_match (argvec, NULL, NON_METHOD,
+ NULL, std::get<0> (m_storage),
+ NULL, &symp, NULL, 0, noside);
+
+ if (SYMBOL_TYPE (symp)->code () == TYPE_CODE_ERROR)
+ error_unknown_type (symp->print_name ());
+ value *callee = evaluate_var_value (noside, std::get<1> (m_storage), symp);
+
+ return evaluate_subexp_do_call (exp, noside, callee, argvec,
+ nullptr, expect_type);
+}
+
+value *
+scope_operation::evaluate_funcall (struct type *expect_type,
+ struct expression *exp,
+ enum noside noside,
+ const std::vector<operation_up> &args)
+{
+ if (!overload_resolution
+ || exp->language_defn->la_language != language_cplus)
+ return operation::evaluate_funcall (expect_type, exp, noside, args);
+
+ /* Unpack it locally so we can properly handle overload
+ resolution. */
+ const std::string &name = std::get<1> (m_storage);
+ struct type *type = std::get<0> (m_storage);
+
+ symbol *function = NULL;
+ const char *function_name = NULL;
+ std::vector<value *> argvec (1 + args.size ());
+ if (type->code () == TYPE_CODE_NAMESPACE)
+ {
+ function = cp_lookup_symbol_namespace (type->name (),
+ name.c_str (),
+ get_selected_block (0),
+ VAR_DOMAIN).symbol;
+ if (function == NULL)
+ error (_("No symbol \"%s\" in namespace \"%s\"."),
+ name.c_str (), type->name ());
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ gdb_assert (type->code () == TYPE_CODE_STRUCT
+ || type->code () == TYPE_CODE_UNION);
+ function_name = name.c_str ();
+
+ /* We need a properly typed value for method lookup. */
+ argvec[0] = value_zero (type, lval_memory);
+ }
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < args.size (); ++i)
+ argvec[i + 1] = args[i]->evaluate_with_coercion (exp, noside);
+ gdb::array_view<value *> arg_view = argvec;
+
+ value *callee = nullptr;
+ if (function_name != nullptr)
+ {
+ int static_memfuncp;
+
+ find_overload_match (arg_view, function_name, METHOD,
+ &argvec[0], nullptr, &callee, nullptr,
+ &static_memfuncp, 0, noside);
+ if (!static_memfuncp)
+ {
+ /* For the time being, we don't handle this. */
+ error (_("Call to overloaded function %s requires "
+ "`this' pointer"),
+ function_name);
+ }
+
+ arg_view = arg_view.slice (1);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ symbol *symp;
+ arg_view = arg_view.slice (1);
+ find_overload_match (arg_view, nullptr,
+ NON_METHOD, nullptr, function,
+ nullptr, &symp, nullptr, 1, noside);
+ callee = value_of_variable (symp, get_selected_block (0));
+ }
+
+ return evaluate_subexp_do_call (exp, noside, callee, arg_view,
+ nullptr, expect_type);
+}
+
+value *
+structop_member_base::evaluate_funcall (struct type *expect_type,
+ struct expression *exp,
+ enum noside noside,
+ const std::vector<operation_up> &args)
+{
+ /* First, evaluate the structure into lhs. */
+ value *lhs;
+ if (opcode () == STRUCTOP_MEMBER)
+ lhs = std::get<0> (m_storage)->evaluate_for_address (exp, noside);
+ else
+ lhs = std::get<0> (m_storage)->evaluate (nullptr, exp, noside);
+
+ std::vector<value *> vals (args.size () + 1);
+ gdb::array_view<value *> val_view = vals;
+ /* If the function is a virtual function, then the aggregate
+ value (providing the structure) plays its part by providing
+ the vtable. Otherwise, it is just along for the ride: call
+ the function directly. */
+ value *rhs = std::get<1> (m_storage)->evaluate (nullptr, exp, noside);
+ value *callee;
+
+ type *a1_type = check_typedef (value_type (rhs));
+ if (a1_type->code () == TYPE_CODE_METHODPTR)
+ {
+ if (noside == EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS)
+ callee = value_zero (TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (a1_type), not_lval);
+ else
+ callee = cplus_method_ptr_to_value (&lhs, rhs);
+
+ vals[0] = lhs;
+ }
+ else if (a1_type->code () == TYPE_CODE_MEMBERPTR)
+ {
+ struct type *type_ptr
+ = lookup_pointer_type (TYPE_SELF_TYPE (a1_type));
+ struct type *target_type_ptr
+ = lookup_pointer_type (TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (a1_type));
+
+ /* Now, convert this value to an address. */
+ lhs = value_cast (type_ptr, lhs);
+
+ long mem_offset = value_as_long (rhs);
+
+ callee = value_from_pointer (target_type_ptr,
+ value_as_long (lhs) + mem_offset);
+ callee = value_ind (callee);
+
+ val_view = val_view.slice (1);
+ }
+ else
+ error (_("Non-pointer-to-member value used in pointer-to-member "
+ "construct"));
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < args.size (); ++i)
+ vals[i + 1] = args[i]->evaluate_with_coercion (exp, noside);
+
+ return evaluate_subexp_do_call (exp, noside, callee, val_view,
+ nullptr, expect_type);
+
+}
+
+value *
+structop_base_operation::evaluate_funcall
+ (struct type *expect_type, struct expression *exp, enum noside noside,
+ const std::vector<operation_up> &args)
+{
+ std::vector<value *> vals (args.size () + 1);
+ /* First, evaluate the structure into vals[0]. */
+ enum exp_opcode op = opcode ();
+ if (op == STRUCTOP_STRUCT)
+ {
+ /* If v is a variable in a register, and the user types
+ v.method (), this will produce an error, because v has no
+ address.
+
+ A possible way around this would be to allocate a copy of
+ the variable on the stack, copy in the contents, call the
+ function, and copy out the contents. I.e. convert this
+ from call by reference to call by copy-return (or
+ whatever it's called). However, this does not work
+ because it is not the same: the method being called could
+ stash a copy of the address, and then future uses through
+ that address (after the method returns) would be expected
+ to use the variable itself, not some copy of it. */
+ vals[0] = std::get<0> (m_storage)->evaluate_for_address (exp, noside);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ vals[0] = std::get<0> (m_storage)->evaluate (nullptr, exp, noside);
+ /* Check to see if the operator '->' has been overloaded.
+ If the operator has been overloaded replace vals[0] with the
+ value returned by the custom operator and continue
+ evaluation. */
+ while (unop_user_defined_p (op, vals[0]))
+ {
+ struct value *value = nullptr;
+ try
+ {
+ value = value_x_unop (vals[0], op, noside);
+ }
+ catch (const gdb_exception_error &except)
+ {
+ if (except.error == NOT_FOUND_ERROR)
+ break;
+ else
+ throw;
+ }
+
+ vals[0] = value;
+ }
+ }
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < args.size (); ++i)
+ vals[i + 1] = args[i]->evaluate_with_coercion (exp, noside);
+ gdb::array_view<value *> arg_view = vals;
+
+ int static_memfuncp;
+ value *callee;
+ const char *tstr = std::get<1> (m_storage).c_str ();
+ if (overload_resolution
+ && exp->language_defn->la_language == language_cplus)
+ {
+ /* Language is C++, do some overload resolution before
+ evaluation. */
+ value *val0 = vals[0];
+ find_overload_match (arg_view, tstr, METHOD,
+ &val0, nullptr, &callee, nullptr,
+ &static_memfuncp, 0, noside);
+ vals[0] = val0;
+ }
+ else
+ /* Non-C++ case -- or no overload resolution. */
+ {
+ struct value *temp = vals[0];
+
+ callee = value_struct_elt (&temp, &vals[1], tstr,
+ &static_memfuncp,
+ op == STRUCTOP_STRUCT
+ ? "structure" : "structure pointer");
+ /* value_struct_elt updates temp with the correct value of the
+ ``this'' pointer if necessary, so modify it to reflect any
+ ``this'' changes. */
+ vals[0] = value_from_longest (lookup_pointer_type (value_type (temp)),
+ value_address (temp)
+ + value_embedded_offset (temp));
+ }
+
+ /* Take out `this' if needed. */
+ if (static_memfuncp)
+ arg_view = arg_view.slice (1);
+
+ return evaluate_subexp_do_call (exp, noside, callee, arg_view,
+ nullptr, expect_type);
+}
+
+
+} /* namespace expr */
+
/* Return true if type is integral or reference to integral */
static bool
diff --git a/gdb/expop.h b/gdb/expop.h
index 08e40345e76..de4b876de39 100644
--- a/gdb/expop.h
+++ b/gdb/expop.h
@@ -594,6 +594,11 @@ class scope_operation
value *evaluate_for_address (struct expression *exp,
enum noside noside) override;
+ value *evaluate_funcall (struct type *expect_type,
+ struct expression *exp,
+ enum noside noside,
+ const std::vector<operation_up> &args) override;
+
enum exp_opcode opcode () const override
{ return OP_SCOPE; }
@@ -631,6 +636,11 @@ class var_value_operation
value *evaluate_for_address (struct expression *exp, enum noside noside)
override;
+ value *evaluate_funcall (struct type *expect_type,
+ struct expression *exp,
+ enum noside noside,
+ const std::vector<operation_up> &args) override;
+
enum exp_opcode opcode () const override
{ return OP_VAR_VALUE; }
@@ -971,6 +981,11 @@ class structop_base_operation
EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS);
}
+ value *evaluate_funcall (struct type *expect_type,
+ struct expression *exp,
+ enum noside noside,
+ const std::vector<operation_up> &args) override;
+
protected:
using tuple_holding_operation::tuple_holding_operation;
@@ -1044,13 +1059,26 @@ class structop_ptr_operation
}
};
-class structop_member_operation
+class structop_member_base
: public tuple_holding_operation<operation_up, operation_up>
{
public:
using tuple_holding_operation::tuple_holding_operation;
+ value *evaluate_funcall (struct type *expect_type,
+ struct expression *exp,
+ enum noside noside,
+ const std::vector<operation_up> &args) override;
+};
+
+class structop_member_operation
+ : public structop_member_base
+{
+public:
+
+ using structop_member_base::structop_member_base;
+
value *evaluate (struct type *expect_type,
struct expression *exp,
enum noside noside) override
@@ -1067,11 +1095,11 @@ class structop_member_operation
};
class structop_mptr_operation
- : public tuple_holding_operation<operation_up, operation_up>
+ : public structop_member_base
{
public:
- using tuple_holding_operation::tuple_holding_operation;
+ using structop_member_base::structop_member_base;
value *evaluate (struct type *expect_type,
struct expression *exp,
@@ -2068,6 +2096,27 @@ class array_operation
enum noside noside, int nargs);
};
+/* A function call. This holds the callee operation and the
+ arguments. */
+class funcall_operation
+ : public tuple_holding_operation<operation_up, std::vector<operation_up>>
+{
+public:
+
+ using tuple_holding_operation::tuple_holding_operation;
+
+ value *evaluate (struct type *expect_type,
+ struct expression *exp,
+ enum noside noside) override
+ {
+ return std::get<0> (m_storage)->evaluate_funcall (expect_type, exp, noside,
+ std::get<1> (m_storage));
+ }
+
+ enum exp_opcode opcode () const override
+ { return OP_FUNCALL; }
+};
+
} /* namespace expr */
#endif /* EXPOP_H */
diff --git a/gdb/expression.h b/gdb/expression.h
index 08a6424fdd2..a850f64d160 100644
--- a/gdb/expression.h
+++ b/gdb/expression.h
@@ -144,6 +144,15 @@ class operation
virtual value *evaluate_for_address (struct expression *exp,
enum noside noside);
+ /* Evaluate a function call, with this object as the callee.
+ EXPECT_TYPE, EXP, and NOSIDE have the same meaning as in
+ 'evaluate'. ARGS holds the operations that should be evaluated
+ to get the arguments to the call. */
+ virtual value *evaluate_funcall (struct type *expect_type,
+ struct expression *exp,
+ enum noside noside,
+ const std::vector<operation_up> &args);
+
/* True if this is a constant expression. */
virtual bool constant_p () const
{ return false; }
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-01 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 225+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-01 21:44 [PATCH 000/203] Refactor expressions Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 001/203] Split out eval_op_scope Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 002/203] Split out eval_op_var_entry_value Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 003/203] Split out eval_op_var_msym_value Tom Tromey
2021-01-04 11:43 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-02-13 19:37 ` Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 004/203] Split out eval_op_func_static_var Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 005/203] Split out eval_op_register Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 006/203] Split out eval_op_string Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 007/203] Split out eval_op_objc_selector Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 008/203] Split out eval_op_concat Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 009/203] what is this code for Tom Tromey
2021-01-03 6:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2021-01-25 2:28 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-25 3:27 ` Tom Tromey
2021-02-11 2:25 ` Tom Tromey
2021-02-13 19:37 ` Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 010/203] Split out eval_op_ternop Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 011/203] Split out eval_op_structop_struct Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 012/203] Split out eval_op_structop_ptr Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 013/203] Split out eval_op_member Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 014/203] Split out eval_op_add Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 015/203] Split out eval_op_sub Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 016/203] Split out eval_op_binary Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 017/203] Split out eval_op_subscript Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 018/203] Split out eval_op_equal Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 019/203] Split out eval_op_notequal Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 020/203] Split out eval_op_less Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 021/203] Split out eval_op_gtr Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 022/203] Split out eval_op_geq Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 023/203] Split out eval_op_leq Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 024/203] Split out eval_op_repeat Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 025/203] Split out eval_op_plus Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 026/203] Split out eval_op_neg Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 027/203] Split out eval_op_complement Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 028/203] Split out eval_op_lognot Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 029/203] Split out eval_op_ind Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 030/203] Split out eval_op_alignof Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 031/203] Split out eval_op_memval Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 032/203] Split out eval_op_preinc Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 033/203] Split out eval_op_predec Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 034/203] Split out eval_op_postinc Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 035/203] Split out eval_op_postdec Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 036/203] Split out eval_op_type Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 037/203] Split out eval_op_f_abs Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 038/203] Split out eval_op_f_mod Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 039/203] Split out eval_op_f_ceil Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 040/203] Split out eval_op_f_floor Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 041/203] Split out eval_op_f_modulo Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 042/203] Split out eval_op_f_cmplx Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 043/203] Split out eval_op_f_kind Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 044/203] Change parameters to rust_range Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 045/203] Change parameters to rust_subscript Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 046/203] Split out eval_op_rust_ind Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 047/203] Split out eval_op_rust_complement Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 048/203] Split out eval_op_rust_array Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 049/203] Split out eval_op_rust_struct_anon Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 050/203] Split out eval_op_rust_structop Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 051/203] Split helper functions Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 052/203] Split out eval_op_m2_high Tom Tromey
2021-01-04 12:05 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-02-10 0:56 ` Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 053/203] Split out eval_op_m2_subscript Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 054/203] Split out eval_binop_assign_modify Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 055/203] Split out eval_op_objc_msgcall Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 056/203] Split out eval_opencl_assign Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 057/203] Split out eval_ternop_in_range Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 058/203] Split out ada_unop_neg Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:44 ` [PATCH 059/203] Split out ada_unop_in_range Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 060/203] Split out ada_atr_tag Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 061/203] Split out ada_atr_size Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 062/203] Split out ada_abs Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 063/203] Split out ada_mult_binop Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 064/203] Split out ada_equal_binop Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 065/203] Split out ada_ternop_slice Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 066/203] Split out ada_binop_in_bounds Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 067/203] Split out ada_unop_atr Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 068/203] Split out ada_binop_minmax Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 069/203] Change value_val_atr to ada_val_atr Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 070/203] Split out ada_binop_exp Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 071/203] Split out eval_multi_subscript Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 072/203] Split gen_expr_binop_rest Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 073/203] Introduce class operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-03 7:09 ` Joel Brobecker
2021-01-03 13:55 ` Lancelot SIX via Gdb-patches
2021-02-10 0:57 ` Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 074/203] Implement dumping Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 075/203] Add two agent expression helper functions Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 076/203] Introduce float_const_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 077/203] Introduce scope_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 078/203] Introduce long_const_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 079/203] Introduce var_msym_value_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 080/203] Introduce var_entry_value_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 081/203] Introduce func_static_var_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 082/203] Introduce last_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 083/203] Introduce register_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 084/203] Introduce bool_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 085/203] Introduce internalvar_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 086/203] Introduce string_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 087/203] Introduce ternop_slice_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 088/203] Introduce ternop_cond_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 089/203] Add c-exp.h and c_string_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 090/203] Introduce objc_nsstring_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 091/203] Introduce objc_selector_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 092/203] Introduce complex_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 093/203] Introduce structop_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 094/203] Introduce structop_ptr_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 095/203] Introduce structop_member_operation and structop_mptr_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 096/203] Introduce concat_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 097/203] Introduce add_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 098/203] Introduce sub_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 099/203] Introduce binop_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 100/203] Introduce subscript_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 101/203] Implement binary comparison operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 102/203] Introduce repeat_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 103/203] Introduce comma_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 104/203] Implement some unary operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 105/203] Implement unary increment and decrement operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 106/203] Introduce unop_ind_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 107/203] Introduce type_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 108/203] Introduce typeof_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 109/203] Introduce decltype_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 110/203] Introduce typeid_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 111/203] Introduce unop_addr_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 112/203] Introduce unop_sizeof_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 113/203] Introduce unop_alignof_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 114/203] Implement UNOP_MEMVAL and UNOP_MEMVAL_TYPE Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 115/203] Introduce op_this_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 116/203] Introduce type_instance_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 117/203] Introduce assign_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 118/203] Introduce assign_modify_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 119/203] Introduce unop_cast_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 120/203] Introduce unop_cast_type_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 121/203] Implement C++ cast operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 122/203] Introduce var_value_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 123/203] Introduce objc_msgcall_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 124/203] Introduce multi_subscript_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 125/203] Introduce ada_wrapped_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 126/203] Introduce ada_string_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 127/203] Introduce ada_qual_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 128/203] Introduce ada_ternop_range_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 129/203] Implement several Fortran operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 130/203] Implement some Rust operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 131/203] Introduce rust_unop_ind_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 132/203] Introduce rust_subscript_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 133/203] Introduce rust_range_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 134/203] Implement Rust field operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 135/203] Introduce rust_aggregate_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 136/203] Add two simple Modula-2 operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-07 15:16 ` Gaius Mulley via Gdb-patches
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 137/203] Implement the "&&" and "||" operators Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 138/203] Implement some Ada unary operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 139/203] Introduce ada_unop_range_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 140/203] Introduce class adl_func_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 141/203] Introduce array_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 143/203] Implement Rust funcall operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 144/203] Introduce fortran_undetermined Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 145/203] Introduce opencl_cast_type_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 146/203] Implement OpenCL binary operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 147/203] Introduce opencl_notequal_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 148/203] Introduce opencl_structop_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 149/203] Implement OpenCL logical binary operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 150/203] Implement OpenCL ternary conditional operator Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 151/203] Split out some Ada type resolution code Tom Tromey
2021-01-03 7:46 ` Joel Brobecker
2021-02-13 19:47 ` Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 152/203] Introduce ada_binop_addsub_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 153/203] Implement Ada multiplicative operators Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 154/203] Implement Ada equality operators Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 155/203] Introduce ada_bitwise_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 156/203] Introduce ada_ternop_slice Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 157/203] Introduce ada_binop_in_bounds Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 158/203] Implement some Ada OP_ATR_ operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 159/203] Introduce ada_var_value_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 160/203] Introduce ada_var_msym_value_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 161/203] Implement Ada min and max operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 162/203] Refactor value_pos_atr Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 163/203] Introduce ada_pos_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 164/203] Introduce ada_atr_val_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 165/203] Introduce ada_binop_exp_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 166/203] Introduce ada_unop_ind_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 167/203] Introduce ada_structop_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 168/203] Implement function calls for Ada Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 169/203] Implement Ada resolution Tom Tromey
2021-01-03 7:57 ` Joel Brobecker
2021-02-13 19:49 ` Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 170/203] Implement Ada assignment Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 171/203] Remove use of op_string Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 172/203] Add an expr::operation_up to struct expression Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 173/203] Add completion for operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 174/203] Add operation-related methods to parser_state Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 175/203] Convert dtrace probes to use operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 176/203] Convert stap probes to create operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 177/203] Convert rust-exp.y to use operations Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 178/203] Convert c-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:46 ` [PATCH 179/203] Convert go-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 180/203] Convert d-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 181/203] Convert p-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 182/203] Convert m2-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 183/203] Convert f-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 184/203] Convert ada-exp.y " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 185/203] Remove now-unused Rust evaluator code Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 186/203] Remove now-unused Fortran " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 187/203] Remove now-unused Modula-2 " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 188/203] Remove now-unused Ada " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 189/203] Remove now-unused C " Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 190/203] Remove union exp_element Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 191/203] Remove two Ada opcodes Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 192/203] Remove unused Modula-2 opcodes Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 193/203] Remove unused Ada opcodes Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 194/203] Remove OP_EXTENDED0 Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 195/203] Remove OP_UNUSED_LAST Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 196/203] Remove BINOP_END Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 197/203] Inline expression constructor Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 198/203] Inline expr_builder methods Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 199/203] Merge namespace scopes in eval.c Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 200/203] Remove EVAL_SKIP Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 201/203] Change exp_uses_objfile to return bool Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 202/203] Use bound_minimal_symbol in var_msym_value_operation Tom Tromey
2021-01-01 21:47 ` [PATCH 203/203] Remove some null checks Tom Tromey
2021-01-03 7:02 ` [PATCH 000/203] Refactor expressions Joel Brobecker
2021-01-04 12:16 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-02-13 19:54 ` Tom Tromey
2021-02-16 16:17 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210101214723.1784144-143-tom@tromey.com \
--to=tom@tromey.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox