From: Luis Machado via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: david.spickett@linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 23/25] Document new "x" and "print" memory tagging extensions
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:39:14 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201230153916.1586725-24-luis.machado@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201230153916.1586725-1-luis.machado@linaro.org>
Document the changes to the "print" and "x" commands to support memory
tagging.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog:
YYYY-MM-DD Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org>
* gdb.texinfo (Data): Document memory tagging changes to the "print"
command.
(Examining Memory): Document memory tagging changes to the "x"
command.
(Memory Tagging): Update with more information on changes to the "x"
and "print" commands.
---
gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
index d5cfc1c40c..44d10ace46 100644
--- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
+++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
@@ -10019,6 +10019,10 @@ If you omit @var{expr}, @value{GDBN} displays the last value again (from the
conveniently inspect the same value in an alternative format.
@end table
+If the architecture supports memory tagging, the @code{print} command will
+display pointer/memory tag mismatches if what is being printed is a pointer
+or reference type. @xref{Memory Tagging}.
+
A more low-level way of examining data is with the @code{x} command.
It examines data in memory at a specified address and prints it in a
specified format. @xref{Memory, ,Examining Memory}.
@@ -10786,7 +10790,8 @@ number is specified, memory is examined backward from @var{addr}.
@item @var{f}, the display format
The display format is one of the formats used by @code{print}
(@samp{x}, @samp{d}, @samp{u}, @samp{o}, @samp{t}, @samp{a}, @samp{c},
-@samp{f}, @samp{s}), and in addition @samp{i} (for machine instructions).
+@samp{f}, @samp{s}), @samp{i} (for machine instructions) and
+@samp{m} (for displaying memory tags).
The default is @samp{x} (hexadecimal) initially. The default changes
each time you use either @code{x} or @code{print}.
@@ -10881,6 +10886,22 @@ counter is shown with a @code{=>} marker. For example:
0x804838c <main+24>: call 0x80482d4 <puts@@plt>
@end smallexample
+If the architecture supports memory tagging, the tags can be displayed by
+using @samp{m}. @xref{Memory Tagging}.
+
+The information will be displayed once per granule size
+(the amount of bytes a particular memory tag covers). For example, AArch64
+has a granule size of 16 bytes, so it will display a tag every 16 bytes.
+
+Due to the way @value{GDBN} prints information with the @code{x} command (not
+aligned to a particular boundary), the tag information will refer to the
+initial address displayed on a particular line. If a memory tag boundary
+is crossed in the middle of a line displayed by the @code{x} command, it
+will be displayed on the next line.
+
+The @samp{m} format doesn't affect any other specified formats that were
+passed to the @code{x} command.
+
@cindex @code{$_}, @code{$__}, and value history
The addresses and contents printed by the @code{x} command are not saved
in the value history because there is often too much of them and they
@@ -10958,8 +10979,9 @@ If the underlying architecture supports memory tagging, like AArch64 MTE
or SPARC ADI do, @value{GDBN} can make use of it to validate addresses and
pointers against memory allocation tags.
-A command prefix of @code{memory-tag} gives access to the various memory tagging
-commands.
+The @code{print} (@pxref{Data}) and @code{x} (@pxref{Memory}) commands will
+display tag information when appropriate, and a command prefix of
+@code{memory-tag} gives access to the various memory tagging commands.
The @code{memory-tag} commands are the following:
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-30 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-30 15:38 [PATCH v4 00/25] Memory Tagging Support + AArch64 Linux implementation Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 01/25] New target methods for memory tagging support Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 02/25] New gdbarch memory tagging hooks Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 03/25] Add GDB-side remote target support for memory tagging Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 04/25] Unit testing for GDB-side remote memory tagging handling Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 05/25] GDBserver remote packet support for memory tagging Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 06/25] Unit tests for gdbserver memory tagging remote packets Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 07/25] Documentation for " Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 20:41 ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 08/25] AArch64: Add MTE CPU feature check support Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 09/25] AArch64: Add target description/feature for MTE registers Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 10/25] AArch64: Add MTE register set support for GDB and gdbserver Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 11/25] AArch64: Add MTE ptrace requests Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 12/25] AArch64: Implement memory tagging target methods for AArch64 Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 13/25] Convert char array to std::string in linux_find_memory_regions_full Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 14/25] Refactor parsing of /proc/<pid>/smaps Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 15/25] AArch64: Implement the memory tagging gdbarch hooks Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 16/25] AArch64: Add unit testing for logical tag set/get operations Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 17/25] AArch64: Report tag violation error information Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 18/25] AArch64: Add gdbserver MTE support Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 19/25] AArch64: Add MTE register set support for core files Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 20/25] New memory-tag commands Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 21/25] Documentation for the new mtag commands Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 20:43 ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 22/25] Extend "x" and "print" commands to support memory tagging Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches [this message]
2020-12-30 20:44 ` [PATCH v4 23/25] Document new "x" and "print" memory tagging extensions Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 24/25] Add NEWS entry Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 20:45 ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 25/25] Add memory tagging testcases Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2021-01-15 16:02 ` [PATCH v4 00/25] Memory Tagging Support + AArch64 Linux implementation Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2021-01-26 13:03 ` [PING] " Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2021-01-26 16:26 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-26 16:36 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2021-01-26 16:49 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201230153916.1586725-24-luis.machado@linaro.org \
--to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=david.spickett@linaro.org \
--cc=luis.machado@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox