From: Luis Machado via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: david.spickett@linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 01/25] New target methods for memory tagging support
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:38:52 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201230153916.1586725-2-luis.machado@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201230153916.1586725-1-luis.machado@linaro.org>
Updates on v4:
- Updated the return types of fetch/store member functions from int to bool.
- Implemented target-debug type print helpers.
- Renamed global memtag to memory_tagging.
Updates on v3:
- Updated the code documentation for the fetch_memtags and store_memtags
methods.
Updates on v2:
- Added type parameter to fetch_memtags/store_memtags hooks.
--
This patch starts adding some of the generic pieces to accomodate memory
tagging.
We have three new target methods:
- supports_memory_tagging: Checks if the target supports memory tagging. This
defaults to false for targets that don't support memory tagging.
- fetch_memtags: Fetches the allocation tags associated with a particular
memory range [address, address + length).
The default is to return 0 without returning any tags. This should only
be called if memory tagging is supported.
- store_memtags: Stores a set of allocation tags for a particular memory
range [address, address + length).
The default is to return 0. This should only
be called if memory tagging is supported.
It also adds a control option for enabling/disabling memory tagging
manually: set memory-tagging on/off.
The default is "on", with GDB making its use conditional to the
architecture supporting memory tagging.
gdb/ChangeLog:
YYYY-MM-DD Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org>
* printcmd.c (memory_tagging): New static global.
(show_memory_tagging): New function.
(_initialize_printcmd): Add set/show memory-tagging command.
* remote.c (remote_target) <supports_memory_tagging>: New method
override.
<fetch_memtags>: New method override.
<store_memtags>: New method override.
(remote_target::supports_memory_tagging): New method.
(remote_target::fetch_memtags): New method.
(remote_target::store_memtags): New method.
* target-delegates.c: Regenerate.
* target.h (struct target_ops) <supports_memory_tagging>: New virtual
method.
<fetch_memtags>: New virtual method.
<store_memtags>: New virtual method.
(target_supports_memory_tagging): Define.
(target_fetch_memtags): Define.
(target_store_memtags): Define.
* target-debug.h (target_debug_print_size_t)
(target_debug_print_const_gdb_byte_vector_r)
(target_debug_print_gdb_byte_vector_r): New functions.
---
gdb/printcmd.c | 28 +++++++++++++
gdb/remote.c | 34 +++++++++++++++
gdb/target-debug.h | 24 +++++++++++
gdb/target-delegates.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
gdb/target.h | 41 ++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 222 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gdb/printcmd.c b/gdb/printcmd.c
index de083a2a76..974b0480c7 100644
--- a/gdb/printcmd.c
+++ b/gdb/printcmd.c
@@ -85,6 +85,24 @@ static CORE_ADDR last_examine_address;
static value_ref_ptr last_examine_value;
+/* If TRUE (default), and the architecture supports it, GDB will attempt to use
+ the memory tagging infrastructure to validate certain memory accesses. It
+ will also report memory tag violations alongside a SIGSEGV signal.
+
+ If FALSE, GDB will not use memory tagging in any way, and debugging will
+ work in the standard way. */
+static bool memory_tagging = true;
+
+static void
+show_memory_tagging (struct ui_file *file, int from_tty,
+ struct cmd_list_element *c,
+ const char *value)
+{
+ fprintf_filtered (file,
+ _("Use of memory tagging infrastructure is \"%s\".\n"),
+ value);
+}
+
/* Largest offset between a symbolic value and an address, that will be
printed as `0x1234 <symbol+offset>'. */
@@ -2980,4 +2998,14 @@ Construct a GDB command and then evaluate it.\n\
Usage: eval \"format string\", ARG1, ARG2, ARG3, ..., ARGN\n\
Convert the arguments to a string as \"printf\" would, but then\n\
treat this string as a command line, and evaluate it."));
+
+ add_setshow_boolean_cmd ("memory-tagging", class_support,
+ &memory_tagging, _("\
+Set whether the debugger should use memory tagging infrastructure."), _("\
+Show whether the debugger should use memory tagging infrastructure."), _("\
+If on, gdb will attempt to validate memory tags and will warn the user if\n\
+certain operations have illegal tags."),
+ NULL,
+ show_memory_tagging,
+ &setlist, &showlist);
}
diff --git a/gdb/remote.c b/gdb/remote.c
index 71f814efb3..c7f09c4269 100644
--- a/gdb/remote.c
+++ b/gdb/remote.c
@@ -686,6 +686,14 @@ class remote_target : public process_stratum_target
int remove_exec_catchpoint (int) override;
enum exec_direction_kind execution_direction () override;
+ bool supports_memory_tagging () override;
+
+ bool fetch_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type) override;
+
+ bool store_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ const gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type) override;
+
public: /* Remote specific methods. */
void remote_download_command_source (int num, ULONGEST addr,
@@ -14389,6 +14397,32 @@ set_range_stepping (const char *ignore_args, int from_tty,
}
}
+/* Implement the "supports_memory_tagging" target_ops method. */
+
+bool
+remote_target::supports_memory_tagging ()
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
+/* Implement the "fetch_memtags" target_ops method. */
+
+bool
+remote_target::fetch_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Implement the "store_memtags" target_ops method. */
+
+bool
+remote_target::store_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ const gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
void _initialize_remote ();
void
_initialize_remote ()
diff --git a/gdb/target-debug.h b/gdb/target-debug.h
index c5abfd46c6..16531470ef 100644
--- a/gdb/target-debug.h
+++ b/gdb/target-debug.h
@@ -212,4 +212,28 @@ target_debug_print_signals (gdb::array_view<const unsigned char> sigs)
fputs_unfiltered (" }", gdb_stdlog);
}
+static void
+target_debug_print_size_t (size_t size)
+{
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "%s", pulongest (size));
+}
+
+static void
+target_debug_print_const_gdb_byte_vector_r (const gdb::byte_vector &vector)
+{
+ fputs_unfiltered ("{", gdb_stdlog);
+
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < vector.size (); i++)
+ {
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, " %s",
+ phex_nz (vector[i], 1));
+ }
+ fputs_unfiltered (" }", gdb_stdlog);
+}
+
+static void
+target_debug_print_gdb_byte_vector_r (gdb::byte_vector &vector)
+{
+ target_debug_print_gdb_byte_vector_r (vector);
+}
#endif /* TARGET_DEBUG_H */
diff --git a/gdb/target-delegates.c b/gdb/target-delegates.c
index 437b19b858..e4563e4dac 100644
--- a/gdb/target-delegates.c
+++ b/gdb/target-delegates.c
@@ -173,6 +173,9 @@ struct dummy_target : public target_ops
const struct frame_unwind *get_tailcall_unwinder () override;
void prepare_to_generate_core () override;
void done_generating_core () override;
+ bool supports_memory_tagging () override;
+ bool fetch_memtags (CORE_ADDR arg0, size_t arg1, gdb::byte_vector &arg2, int arg3) override;
+ bool store_memtags (CORE_ADDR arg0, size_t arg1, const gdb::byte_vector &arg2, int arg3) override;
};
struct debug_target : public target_ops
@@ -344,6 +347,9 @@ struct debug_target : public target_ops
const struct frame_unwind *get_tailcall_unwinder () override;
void prepare_to_generate_core () override;
void done_generating_core () override;
+ bool supports_memory_tagging () override;
+ bool fetch_memtags (CORE_ADDR arg0, size_t arg1, gdb::byte_vector &arg2, int arg3) override;
+ bool store_memtags (CORE_ADDR arg0, size_t arg1, const gdb::byte_vector &arg2, int arg3) override;
};
void
@@ -4413,3 +4419,92 @@ debug_target::done_generating_core ()
fputs_unfiltered (")\n", gdb_stdlog);
}
+bool
+target_ops::supports_memory_tagging ()
+{
+ return this->beneath ()->supports_memory_tagging ();
+}
+
+bool
+dummy_target::supports_memory_tagging ()
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
+bool
+debug_target::supports_memory_tagging ()
+{
+ bool result;
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "-> %s->supports_memory_tagging (...)\n", this->beneath ()->shortname ());
+ result = this->beneath ()->supports_memory_tagging ();
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "<- %s->supports_memory_tagging (", this->beneath ()->shortname ());
+ fputs_unfiltered (") = ", gdb_stdlog);
+ target_debug_print_bool (result);
+ fputs_unfiltered ("\n", gdb_stdlog);
+ return result;
+}
+
+bool
+target_ops::fetch_memtags (CORE_ADDR arg0, size_t arg1, gdb::byte_vector &arg2, int arg3)
+{
+ return this->beneath ()->fetch_memtags (arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3);
+}
+
+bool
+dummy_target::fetch_memtags (CORE_ADDR arg0, size_t arg1, gdb::byte_vector &arg2, int arg3)
+{
+ tcomplain ();
+}
+
+bool
+debug_target::fetch_memtags (CORE_ADDR arg0, size_t arg1, gdb::byte_vector &arg2, int arg3)
+{
+ bool result;
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "-> %s->fetch_memtags (...)\n", this->beneath ()->shortname ());
+ result = this->beneath ()->fetch_memtags (arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3);
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "<- %s->fetch_memtags (", this->beneath ()->shortname ());
+ target_debug_print_CORE_ADDR (arg0);
+ fputs_unfiltered (", ", gdb_stdlog);
+ target_debug_print_size_t (arg1);
+ fputs_unfiltered (", ", gdb_stdlog);
+ target_debug_print_gdb_byte_vector_r (arg2);
+ fputs_unfiltered (", ", gdb_stdlog);
+ target_debug_print_int (arg3);
+ fputs_unfiltered (") = ", gdb_stdlog);
+ target_debug_print_bool (result);
+ fputs_unfiltered ("\n", gdb_stdlog);
+ return result;
+}
+
+bool
+target_ops::store_memtags (CORE_ADDR arg0, size_t arg1, const gdb::byte_vector &arg2, int arg3)
+{
+ return this->beneath ()->store_memtags (arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3);
+}
+
+bool
+dummy_target::store_memtags (CORE_ADDR arg0, size_t arg1, const gdb::byte_vector &arg2, int arg3)
+{
+ tcomplain ();
+}
+
+bool
+debug_target::store_memtags (CORE_ADDR arg0, size_t arg1, const gdb::byte_vector &arg2, int arg3)
+{
+ bool result;
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "-> %s->store_memtags (...)\n", this->beneath ()->shortname ());
+ result = this->beneath ()->store_memtags (arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3);
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "<- %s->store_memtags (", this->beneath ()->shortname ());
+ target_debug_print_CORE_ADDR (arg0);
+ fputs_unfiltered (", ", gdb_stdlog);
+ target_debug_print_size_t (arg1);
+ fputs_unfiltered (", ", gdb_stdlog);
+ target_debug_print_const_gdb_byte_vector_r (arg2);
+ fputs_unfiltered (", ", gdb_stdlog);
+ target_debug_print_int (arg3);
+ fputs_unfiltered (") = ", gdb_stdlog);
+ target_debug_print_bool (result);
+ fputs_unfiltered ("\n", gdb_stdlog);
+ return result;
+}
+
diff --git a/gdb/target.h b/gdb/target.h
index 416b8089fa..a35e07d0a3 100644
--- a/gdb/target.h
+++ b/gdb/target.h
@@ -1260,6 +1260,38 @@ struct target_ops
/* Cleanup after generating a core file. */
virtual void done_generating_core ()
TARGET_DEFAULT_IGNORE ();
+
+ /* Returns true if the target supports memory tagging, false otherwise. */
+ virtual bool supports_memory_tagging ()
+ TARGET_DEFAULT_RETURN (false);
+
+ /* Return the allocated memory tags of type TYPE associated with
+ [ADDRESS, ADDRESS + LEN) in TAGS.
+
+ LEN is the number of bytes in the memory range. TAGS is a vector of
+ bytes containing the tags found in the above memory range.
+
+ It is up to the architecture/target to interpret the bytes in the TAGS
+ vector and read the tags appropriately.
+
+ Returns true if fetching the tags succeeded and false otherwise. */
+ virtual bool fetch_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type)
+ TARGET_DEFAULT_NORETURN (tcomplain ());
+
+ /* Write the allocation tags of type TYPE contained in TAGS to the memory
+ range [ADDRESS, ADDRESS + LEN).
+
+ LEN is the number of bytes in the memory range. TAGS is a vector of
+ bytes containing the tags to be stored to the memory range.
+
+ It is up to the architecture/target to interpret the bytes in the TAGS
+ vector and store them appropriately.
+
+ Returns true if storing the tags succeeded and false otherwise. */
+ virtual bool store_memtags (CORE_ADDR address, size_t len,
+ const gdb::byte_vector &tags, int type)
+ TARGET_DEFAULT_NORETURN (tcomplain ());
};
/* Deleter for std::unique_ptr. See comments in
@@ -2312,6 +2344,15 @@ extern gdb::unique_xmalloc_ptr<char> target_fileio_read_stralloc
#define target_augmented_libraries_svr4_read() \
(current_top_target ()->augmented_libraries_svr4_read) ()
+#define target_supports_memory_tagging() \
+ ((current_top_target ()->supports_memory_tagging) ())
+
+#define target_fetch_memtags(address, len, tags, type) \
+ (current_top_target ()->fetch_memtags) ((address), (len), (tags), (type))
+
+#define target_store_memtags(address, len, tags, type) \
+ (current_top_target ()->store_memtags) ((address), (len), (tags), (type))
+
/* Command logging facility. */
#define target_log_command(p) \
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-30 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-30 15:38 [PATCH v4 00/25] Memory Tagging Support + AArch64 Linux implementation Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:38 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches [this message]
2020-12-30 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 02/25] New gdbarch memory tagging hooks Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 03/25] Add GDB-side remote target support for memory tagging Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 04/25] Unit testing for GDB-side remote memory tagging handling Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 05/25] GDBserver remote packet support for memory tagging Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 06/25] Unit tests for gdbserver memory tagging remote packets Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 07/25] Documentation for " Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 20:41 ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 08/25] AArch64: Add MTE CPU feature check support Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 09/25] AArch64: Add target description/feature for MTE registers Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 10/25] AArch64: Add MTE register set support for GDB and gdbserver Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 11/25] AArch64: Add MTE ptrace requests Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 12/25] AArch64: Implement memory tagging target methods for AArch64 Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 13/25] Convert char array to std::string in linux_find_memory_regions_full Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 14/25] Refactor parsing of /proc/<pid>/smaps Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 15/25] AArch64: Implement the memory tagging gdbarch hooks Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 16/25] AArch64: Add unit testing for logical tag set/get operations Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 17/25] AArch64: Report tag violation error information Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 18/25] AArch64: Add gdbserver MTE support Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 19/25] AArch64: Add MTE register set support for core files Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 20/25] New memory-tag commands Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 21/25] Documentation for the new mtag commands Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 20:43 ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 22/25] Extend "x" and "print" commands to support memory tagging Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 23/25] Document new "x" and "print" memory tagging extensions Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 20:44 ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 24/25] Add NEWS entry Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 20:45 ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2020-12-30 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 25/25] Add memory tagging testcases Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2021-01-15 16:02 ` [PATCH v4 00/25] Memory Tagging Support + AArch64 Linux implementation Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2021-01-26 13:03 ` [PING] " Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2021-01-26 16:26 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-26 16:36 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2021-01-26 16:49 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201230153916.1586725-2-luis.machado@linaro.org \
--to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=david.spickett@linaro.org \
--cc=luis.machado@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox