From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
To: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>,
thomas@schwinge.name, bug-hurd@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hurd: Add shared mig declarations
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 09:20:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200531072032.hfegxapkqv3a3hrb@function> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ec177fc-e9b6-42a0-0aa9-3cec13e9a577@simark.ca>
Simon Marchi, le sam. 30 mai 2020 21:51:35 -0400, a ecrit:
> On 2020-05-30 2:23 p.m., Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Fixes
> >
> > exc_request_S.c:177:24: error: no previous declaration for ‘exc_server’ [-Werror=missing-declarations]
> > 177 | mig_external boolean_t exc_server
> >
> > gdb/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * config/i386/i386gnu.mn [%_S.o %_U.o] (COMPILE.post): Add
> > "-include gnu-nat-mig.h".
> > * gnu-nat-mig.h: New file.
> > * gnu-nat.c: Include "gnu-nat-mig.h".
> > (exc_server, msg_reply_server, notify_server,
> > process_reply_server): Remove declarations.
>
> It took me a while to understand the underlying problem. My understanding is that
> gnu-nat.c calls this function exc_server, that is defined in the generated file. The
> generated file does not provide a header with declarations, so gnu-nat.c had its own
> local declaration. Since we now use the -Wmissing-declarations warning flag, and the
> definition in the generated exc_request_S.c didn't see a corresponding declaration,
> it caused that build failure. Is that correct? If so, please add that explanation
> or equivalent to the commit log.
I have now added
“
We are using -Werror=missing-declarations, and the _S.h files generated
by mig do not currently include a declaration for the server routine.
gnu-nat.c used to have its own external declarations, but better just
share them between gnu-nat.c and the _S.c files.
”
> My question now is: that MIG tool appears to generate both a header (%_S.h) and source
> file (%_S.c) from defs files. What is this header file used for, if it doesn't contain
> the declaration for the functions in the source file?
Mig does include declarations for the functions of the .c files, but
not for the server routine, I don't know why that was never implemented
there (this hasn't been touched since the VCS initial import).
Samuel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-31 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-30 18:23 Samuel Thibault
2020-05-30 18:30 ` Samuel Thibault
2020-05-30 19:51 ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-30 20:28 ` Samuel Thibault
2020-05-31 1:51 ` Simon Marchi
2020-05-31 7:20 ` Samuel Thibault [this message]
2020-06-01 2:05 ` Simon Marchi
2020-06-01 7:54 ` Samuel Thibault
2020-06-01 16:33 ` Christian Biesinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200531072032.hfegxapkqv3a3hrb@function \
--to=samuel.thibault@gnu.org \
--cc=bug-hurd@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simark@simark.ca \
--cc=thomas@codesourcery.com \
--cc=thomas@schwinge.name \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox