From: "Tankut Baris Aktemur (Code Review)" <gerrit@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>,
Tom Tromey <tromey@sourceware.org>,
Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
Subject: [review] gdb: recognize new DWARF attributes: defaulted, deleted, calling conv.
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191031172217.0B47320AF6@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gerrit.1571406803000.I54192f363115b78ec7435a8563b73fcace420765@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io>
Tankut Baris Aktemur has posted comments on this change.
Change URL: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/135
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(5 comments)
> I assume this is used elsewhere in your series. Now that we're on gerrit and can't
> do cover letters, I think it would be helpful if supporting patches like this could
> mention facts like that... something for us all to consider as we write commit
> messages.
Yes. I update the commit message in v2.
https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/135/1/gdb/dwarf2read.c
File gdb/dwarf2read.c:
https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/135/1/gdb/dwarf2read.c@15533
PS1, Line 15533:
15422 | dwarf2_add_member_fn (struct field_info *fip, struct die_info *die,
| ...
15528 | if (attr && DW_UNSND (attr) != 0)
15529 | fnp->is_artificial = 1;
15530 |
15531 | /* Check for defaulted methods. */
15532 | attr = dwarf2_attr (die, DW_AT_defaulted, cu);
15533 > if (attr)
15534 | fnp->defaulted = DW_UNSND (attr);
15535 |
15536 | /* Check for deleted methods. */
15537 | attr = dwarf2_attr (die, DW_AT_deleted, cu);
15538 | if (attr && DW_UNSND (attr) != 0)
> Use: [â¦]
Done
https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/135/1/gdb/dwarf2read.c@15534
PS1, Line 15534:
15422 | dwarf2_add_member_fn (struct field_info *fip, struct die_info *die,
| ...
15529 | fnp->is_artificial = 1;
15530 |
15531 | /* Check for defaulted methods. */
15532 | attr = dwarf2_attr (die, DW_AT_defaulted, cu);
15533 | if (attr)
15534 > fnp->defaulted = DW_UNSND (attr);
15535 |
15536 | /* Check for deleted methods. */
15537 | attr = dwarf2_attr (die, DW_AT_deleted, cu);
15538 | if (attr && DW_UNSND (attr) != 0)
15539 | fnp->is_deleted = 1;
> Shouldn't we do a bit of validation here, making sure `attr` is one of the valid values, issuing a c [â¦]
Done
https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/135/1/gdb/gdbtypes.h
File gdb/gdbtypes.h:
https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/135/1/gdb/gdbtypes.h@929
PS1, Line 929:
899 | struct fn_field
| ...
924 | struct type *fcontext;
925 |
926 | /* * DW_AT_defaulted attribute for this function; the value is one
927 | of the DW_DEFAULTED enum dwarf_defaulted_attribute constants. */
928 |
929 > unsigned int defaulted;
930 |
931 | /* Attributes. */
932 |
933 | unsigned int is_const:1;
934 | unsigned int is_volatile:1;
> Should this be a bit-field or a narrower integer type? [â¦]
In v2, I make this 2-bit-wide and move down for better packing.
https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/135/1/gdb/gdbtypes.h@929
PS1, Line 929:
899 | struct fn_field
| ...
924 | struct type *fcontext;
925 |
926 | /* * DW_AT_defaulted attribute for this function; the value is one
927 | of the DW_DEFAULTED enum dwarf_defaulted_attribute constants. */
928 |
929 > unsigned int defaulted;
930 |
931 | /* Attributes. */
932 |
933 | unsigned int is_const:1;
934 | unsigned int is_volatile:1;
> It would be good for this field to be an enum. [â¦]
In v2, I make this an ENUM_BITFIELD.
https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/135/1/gdb/gdbtypes.h@1101
PS1, Line 1101:
986 | struct cplus_struct_type
| ...
1096 |
1097 | /* * The calling convention for this type, fetched from the
1098 | DW_AT_calling_convention attribute. The value is one of the
1099 | DW_CC enum dwarf_calling_convention constants. */
1100 |
1101 > unsigned calling_convention : 8;
1102 | };
1103 |
1104 | /* * Struct used to store conversion rankings. */
1105 |
1106 | struct rank
> Ah, thanks for pointing out this other usage in func_type. [â¦]
Yes, agree. In v2, I make this an ENUM_BITFIELD and move near `is_dynamic`.
--
Gerrit-Project: binutils-gdb
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I54192f363115b78ec7435a8563b73fcace420765
Gerrit-Change-Number: 135
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com>
Gerrit-CC: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Gerrit-CC: Tom Tromey <tromey@sourceware.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:22:16 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Tom Tromey <tromey@sourceware.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-31 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-18 13:53 Tankut Baris Aktemur (Code Review)
2019-10-18 14:02 ` Tankut Baris Aktemur (Code Review)
2019-10-23 14:31 ` Tom Tromey (Code Review)
2019-10-29 22:20 ` Tom Tromey (Code Review)
2019-10-30 3:30 ` Simon Marchi (Code Review)
2019-10-31 9:43 ` Tankut Baris Aktemur (Code Review)
2019-10-31 14:10 ` Simon Marchi (Code Review)
2019-10-31 17:22 ` Tankut Baris Aktemur (Code Review) [this message]
2019-10-31 17:24 ` [review v2] " Tankut Baris Aktemur (Code Review)
2019-10-31 17:57 ` Simon Marchi (Code Review)
2019-10-31 20:07 ` [review v3] " Tankut Baris Aktemur (Code Review)
2019-10-31 20:12 ` Simon Marchi (Code Review)
2019-10-31 20:12 ` Simon Marchi (Code Review)
2019-10-31 20:13 ` Tankut Baris Aktemur (Code Review)
2019-10-31 20:18 ` Simon Marchi (Code Review)
2019-12-20 16:47 ` [pushed] " Sourceware to Gerrit sync (Code Review)
2019-12-20 16:47 ` Sourceware to Gerrit sync (Code Review)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191031172217.0B47320AF6@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io \
--to=gerrit@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io \
--cc=andrew.burgess@embecosm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=gnutoolchain-gerrit@osci.io \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
--cc=tromey@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox