From: "Tom de Vries (Code Review)" <gerrit@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Subject: Change in binutils-gdb[master]: [gdb/tdep] Fix inferior call arg passing for amd64
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191015091117.4489629ECF@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gerrit.1571043259000.Id55c74755f0a431ce31223acc86865718ae0c123@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io>
Tom de Vries has posted comments on this change.
Change URL: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/31
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/31/1/gdb/amd64-tdep.c
File gdb/amd64-tdep.c:
https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/31/1/gdb/amd64-tdep.c@645
PS1, Line 645: theclass[1] = amd64_merge_classes (theclass[1], subclass[1]);
> If we reach here, isn't subclass[1] always NO_CLASS? So this if would be unnecessary?
Doing:
...
if (pos == 0)
- theclass[1] = amd64_merge_classes (theclass[1], subclass[1]);
+ {
+ gdb_assert (subclass[1] == AMD64_NO_CLASS);
+ theclass[1] = amd64_merge_classes (theclass[1], subclass[1]);
+ }
...
gives 180 failure in gdb.base/infcall-nested-structs.exp.
The assert is triggered for the cases where amd64_classify sets theclass[1], in this test-case:
- long double
- double _Complex.
Structurewise, we have (leaving out the massive comment that makes it hard to read):
...
theclass[pos] = amd64_merge_classes (theclass[pos], subclass[0]);
if (bitsize <= 64 && pos == 0 && endpos == 1)
theclass[1] = amd64_merge_classes (theclass[1], subclass[0]);
if (pos == 0)
theclass[1] = amd64_merge_classes (theclass[1], subclass[1]);
...
so 'reach here' means just pos == 0.
This would actually be more precise:
...
- if (pos == 0)
+ if (pos == 0 && endpos == 1)
theclass[1] = amd64_merge_classes (theclass[1], subclass[1]);
...
and therefore we could restructure to:
...
theclass[pos] = amd64_merge_classes (theclass[pos], subclass[0]);
if (pos == 0 && endpos == 1)
{
theclass[1] = amd64_merge_classes (theclass[1], subclass[1]);
if (bitsize <= 64)
theclass[1] = amd64_merge_classes (theclass[1], subclass[0]);
}
...
But I don't think we want to do refactoring like this in this commit.
--
To view, visit https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/binutils-gdb/+/31
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/settings
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-15 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <gerrit.1571043259000.Id55c74755f0a431ce31223acc86865718ae0c123@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io>
2019-10-15 4:54 ` Simon Marchi (Code Review)
2019-10-15 9:11 ` Tom de Vries (Code Review) [this message]
2019-10-15 12:46 ` Simon Marchi (Code Review)
2019-10-15 13:05 ` Andrew Burgess (Code Review)
2019-10-15 13:52 ` Tom de Vries (Code Review)
2019-10-15 16:02 ` Simon Marchi (Code Review)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191015091117.4489629ECF@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io \
--to=gerrit@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
--cc=tdevries@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox