Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] Allow display of negative offsets in print_address_symbolic()
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:47:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190730094748.528e783f@f29-4.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190704045503.1250-5-kevinb@redhat.com>

I somehow missed pushing this commit when I pushed the rest of the
series.  It was strange though - that second hunk of the patch was in,
but the first was not.  Moreover, I didn't see an actual commit in master.

Regardless, it should be in now.

Thanks to Tom de Vries for his help in finding this problem.

Kevin

On Wed,  3 Jul 2019 21:55:02 -0700
Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> wrote:

> When examining addresses associated with blocks with non-contiguous
> address ranges, it's not uncommon to see large positive offsets which,
> for some address width, actually represent a smaller negative offset.
> Here's an example taken from the test case (using the
> dw2-ranges-func-lo-cold executable):
> 
>     (gdb) x/5i foo_cold
>        0x40110d <foo+4294967277>:	push   %rbp
>        0x40110e <foo+4294967278>:	mov    %rsp,%rbp
>        0x401111 <foo+4294967281>:	callq  0x401106 <baz>
>        0x401116 <foo+4294967286>:	nop
>        0x401117 <foo+4294967287>:	pop    %rbp
> 
> This commit, in conjuction with an earlier patch from this series, causes
> cases like the above to be displayed like this (below) instead:
> 
> (gdb) x/5i foo_cold
>    0x40110d <foo_cold>:	push   %rbp
>    0x40110e <foo-18>:	mov    %rsp,%rbp
>    0x401111 <foo-15>:	callq  0x401106 <baz>
>    0x401116 <foo-10>:	nop
>    0x401117 <foo-9>:	pop    %rbp
> 
> Note that the address of foo_cold is now (due to another patch) being
> displayed as <foo_cold> instead of <foo+BigOffset>.  The subsequent
> lines are shown as negative offsets from foo.
> 
> Disassembly using the "disassemble" command is somewhat affected by
> these changes:
> 
> Before:
> 
> (gdb) disassemble foo_cold
> Dump of assembler code for function foo:
> Address range 0x401120 to 0x40113b:
>    0x0000000000401120 <+0>:	push   %rbp
>    0x0000000000401121 <+1>:	mov    %rsp,%rbp
>    0x0000000000401124 <+4>:	callq  0x401119 <bar>
>    0x0000000000401129 <+9>:	mov    0x2ef1(%rip),%eax        # 0x404020 <e>
>    0x000000000040112f <+15>:	test   %eax,%eax
>    0x0000000000401131 <+17>:	je     0x401138 <foo+24>
>    0x0000000000401133 <+19>:	callq  0x40110d <foo+4294967277>
>    0x0000000000401138 <+24>:	nop
>    0x0000000000401139 <+25>:	pop    %rbp
>    0x000000000040113a <+26>:	retq
> Address range 0x40110d to 0x401119:
>    0x000000000040110d <+-19>:	push   %rbp
>    0x000000000040110e <+-18>:	mov    %rsp,%rbp
>    0x0000000000401111 <+-15>:	callq  0x401106 <baz>
>    0x0000000000401116 <+-10>:	nop
>    0x0000000000401117 <+-9>:	pop    %rbp
>    0x0000000000401118 <+-8>:	retq
> End of assembler dump.
> 
> After:
> 
> (gdb) disassemble foo_cold
> Dump of assembler code for function foo:
> Address range 0x401120 to 0x40113b:
>    0x0000000000401120 <+0>:	push   %rbp
>    0x0000000000401121 <+1>:	mov    %rsp,%rbp
>    0x0000000000401124 <+4>:	callq  0x401119 <bar>
>    0x0000000000401129 <+9>:	mov    0x2ef1(%rip),%eax        # 0x404020 <e>
>    0x000000000040112f <+15>:	test   %eax,%eax
>    0x0000000000401131 <+17>:	je     0x401138 <foo+24>
>    0x0000000000401133 <+19>:	callq  0x40110d <foo_cold>
>    0x0000000000401138 <+24>:	nop
>    0x0000000000401139 <+25>:	pop    %rbp
>    0x000000000040113a <+26>:	retq
> Address range 0x40110d to 0x401119:
>    0x000000000040110d <-19>:	push   %rbp
>    0x000000000040110e <-18>:	mov    %rsp,%rbp
>    0x0000000000401111 <-15>:	callq  0x401106 <baz>
>    0x0000000000401116 <-10>:	nop
>    0x0000000000401117 <-9>:	pop    %rbp
>    0x0000000000401118 <-8>:	retq
> End of assembler dump.
> 
> Note that negative offsets are now displayed without the leading "+".
> Also, the callq to foo_cold is now displayed as such instead of a callq
> to foo with a large positive offset.
> 
> gdb/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* printcmd.c (print_address_symbolic): Print negative offsets.
> 	(build_address_symbolic): Force signed arithmetic when computing
> 	offset.
> ---
>  gdb/printcmd.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/printcmd.c b/gdb/printcmd.c
> index 1109cb3046..dce6ab2db9 100644
> --- a/gdb/printcmd.c
> +++ b/gdb/printcmd.c
> @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ print_address_symbolic (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR addr,
>      fputs_filtered ("<", stream);
>    fputs_styled (name.c_str (), function_name_style.style (), stream);
>    if (offset != 0)
> -    fprintf_filtered (stream, "+%u", (unsigned int) offset);
> +    fprintf_filtered (stream, "%+d", offset);
>  
>    /* Append source filename and line number if desired.  Give specific
>       line # of this addr, if we have it; else line # of the nearest symbol.  */
> @@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ build_address_symbolic (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
>        && name_location + max_symbolic_offset > name_location)
>      return 1;
>  
> -  *offset = addr - name_location;
> +  *offset = (LONGEST) addr - name_location;
>  
>    *name = name_temp;
>  
> -- 
> 2.21.0
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-30 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-04  4:55 [PATCH v2 0/5] Non-contiguous address range bug fixes / improvements Kevin Buettner
2019-07-04  4:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] dwarf2-frame.c: Fix FDE processing bug involving non-contiguous ranges Kevin Buettner
2019-07-04  4:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] Restrict use of minsym names when printing addresses in disassembled code Kevin Buettner
2019-07-19 17:07   ` Pedro Alves
2019-07-04  4:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] Prefer symtab symbol over minsym for function names in non-contiguous blocks Kevin Buettner
2019-07-04  5:03   ` Kevin Buettner
2019-07-04  5:05 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] Improve test gdb.dwarf2/dw2-ranges-func.exp Kevin Buettner
2019-07-04  5:08   ` Kevin Buettner
2019-07-04  5:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] Allow display of negative offsets in print_address_symbolic() Kevin Buettner
2019-07-30 16:47   ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
2019-07-27 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Non-contiguous address range bug fixes / improvements Kevin Buettner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190730094748.528e783f@f29-4.lan \
    --to=kevinb@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tdevries@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox