From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Cc: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix PR gdb/23835: Don't redefine _FORTIFY_SOURCE if it's already defined
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 21:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181030214236.29081-1-sergiodj@redhat.com> (raw)
Gentoo has a local GCC patch which always defines _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2.
This causes a build problem when building GDB there, because
"common/common-defs.h" also defines _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2:
CXX gdb.o
In file included from ../../gdb/defs.h:28:0,
from ../../gdb/gdb.c:19:
../../gdb/common/common-defs.h:71:0: error: "_FORTIFY_SOURCE" redefined [-Werror]
#define _FORTIFY_SOURCE 2
<built-in>: note: this is the location of the previous definition
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [Makefile:1619: gdb.o] Error 1
Even though it is questionable whether Gentoo's approach is the
correct one:
https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-29982
https://bugs.gentoo.org/621036
it is still possible for GDB to be a bit more robust here and make
sure it just defines _FORTIFY_SOURCE if it hasn't been defined
already. This patch does that.
Tested by rebuilding and making sure the macro was defined.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2018-10-30 Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
PR gdb/23835
* common/common-defs.h: Don't redefine _FORTIFY_SOURCE is it's
already defined.
---
gdb/ChangeLog | 6 ++++++
gdb/common/common-defs.h | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index 940300f95a..239d7e16c2 100644
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2018-10-30 Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
+
+ PR gdb/23835
+ * common/common-defs.h: Don't redefine _FORTIFY_SOURCE is it's
+ already defined.
+
2018-10-30 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
* main.c (captured_main_1): Check return value of bfd_init.
diff --git a/gdb/common/common-defs.h b/gdb/common/common-defs.h
index 58445b1611..86f7c1ab9a 100644
--- a/gdb/common/common-defs.h
+++ b/gdb/common/common-defs.h
@@ -65,9 +65,10 @@
enable it here in order to try to catch these problems earlier;
plus this seems like a reasonable safety measure. The check for
optimization is required because _FORTIFY_SOURCE only works when
- optimization is enabled. */
+ optimization is enabled. If _FORTIFY_SOURCE is already defined,
+ then we don't do anything. */
-#if defined __OPTIMIZE__ && __OPTIMIZE__ > 0
+#if !defined _FORTIFY_SOURCE && defined __OPTIMIZE__ && __OPTIMIZE__ > 0
#define _FORTIFY_SOURCE 2
#endif
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-10-30 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-30 21:42 Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]
2018-10-30 21:54 ` Simon Marchi
2018-10-30 22:47 ` Joel Brobecker
2018-10-31 20:05 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-10-31 21:27 ` Joel Brobecker
2018-10-31 21:43 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-10-31 20:04 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181030214236.29081-1-sergiodj@redhat.com \
--to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox