From: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
To: Jim Wilson <jimw@sifive.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Don't decrement pc after break.
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 15:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180717153702.GG2888@embecosm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180717001241.25908-1-jimw@sifive.com>
* Jim Wilson <jimw@sifive.com> [2018-07-16 17:12:41 -0700]:
> This is the gdb patch for the RISC-V Linux kernel patch I just submitted.
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10524925/
> This removes the code that decrements the pc after a break, now that we have
> a patch to stop linux from pointlessly adding to the pc after a break. It
> would be nice if this goes in now, to avoid unnecessary divergence between
> gdb and the linux kernel. Palmer, the RISC-V linux kernel maintainer, has
> already agreed to accept that patch.
>
> This will also be needed by the FreeBSD gdb port which may be started soon.
>
> This also fixes a bug in the code. The fact that we have two different
> mechanisms to decide breakpoint size, used_compressed_breakpoints and
> has_compressed_isa, means that it is possible for gdb to emit a 4 byte
> breakpoint and then subtract 2 from the pc, and vice versa. Removing the
> unnecessary pc decrement fixes that problem.
>
> OK?
>
> Jim
>
> gdb/
> * riscv-tdep.c (riscv_has_feature): Delete comment that refers to
> set_gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break. Call riscv_read_misa_reg always.
> (riscv_gdbarch_init): Delete local has_compressed_isa. Delete now
> unecessary braces after EF_RISCV_RVC test. Delete call to
> set_gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break.
This looks good to me.
Thanks,
Andrew
> ---
> gdb/riscv-tdep.c | 25 ++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/riscv-tdep.c b/gdb/riscv-tdep.c
> index 72dab0f897..f5d1af822c 100644
> --- a/gdb/riscv-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/riscv-tdep.c
> @@ -335,23 +335,7 @@ riscv_has_feature (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, char feature)
>
> gdb_assert (feature >= 'A' && feature <= 'Z');
>
> - /* It would be nice to always check with the real target where possible,
> - however, for compressed instructions this is a bad idea.
> -
> - The call to `set_gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break' is made just once per
> - GDBARCH and we decide at that point if we should decrement by 2 or 4
> - bytes based on whether the BFD has compressed instruction support or
> - not.
> -
> - If the BFD was not compiled with compressed instruction support, but we
> - are running on a target with compressed instructions then we might
> - place a 4-byte breakpoint, then decrement the $pc by 2 bytes leading to
> - confusion.
> -
> - It's safer if we just make decisions about compressed instruction
> - support based on the BFD. */
> - if (feature != 'C')
> - misa = riscv_read_misa_reg (&have_read_misa);
> + misa = riscv_read_misa_reg (&have_read_misa);
> if (!have_read_misa || misa == 0)
> misa = gdbarch_tdep (gdbarch)->core_features;
>
> @@ -2440,7 +2424,6 @@ riscv_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info,
> struct gdbarch *gdbarch;
> struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep;
> struct gdbarch_tdep tmp_tdep;
> - bool has_compressed_isa = false;
> int i;
>
> /* Ideally, we'd like to get as much information from the target for
> @@ -2472,10 +2455,7 @@ riscv_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info,
> _("unknown ELF header class %d"), eclass);
>
> if (e_flags & EF_RISCV_RVC)
> - {
> - has_compressed_isa = true;
> - tmp_tdep.core_features |= (1 << ('C' - 'A'));
> - }
> + tmp_tdep.core_features |= (1 << ('C' - 'A'));
>
> if (e_flags & EF_RISCV_FLOAT_ABI_DOUBLE)
> {
> @@ -2545,7 +2525,6 @@ riscv_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info,
> set_gdbarch_register_reggroup_p (gdbarch, riscv_register_reggroup_p);
>
> /* Functions to analyze frames. */
> - set_gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break (gdbarch, (has_compressed_isa ? 2 : 4));
> set_gdbarch_skip_prologue (gdbarch, riscv_skip_prologue);
> set_gdbarch_inner_than (gdbarch, core_addr_lessthan);
> set_gdbarch_frame_align (gdbarch, riscv_frame_align);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-17 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-17 0:12 Jim Wilson
2018-07-17 15:37 ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
2018-07-23 10:31 ` Sebastian Huber
2018-07-23 15:38 ` Jim Wilson
2018-07-23 17:25 ` Sebastian Huber
2018-07-23 23:27 ` Jim Wilson
2018-07-24 6:15 ` Sebastian Huber
2018-07-24 11:41 ` Jim Wilson
2018-07-26 6:30 ` Sebastian Huber
2018-08-03 22:05 ` Palmer Dabbelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180717153702.GG2888@embecosm.com \
--to=andrew.burgess@embecosm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jimw@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox