From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: "Wiederhake, Tim" <tim.wiederhake@intel.com>
Cc: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: MemoryView missing from Python 2.4 and 2.6
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170307152749.qqy6gbktvv3uygll@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9676A094AF46E14E8265E7A3F4CCE9AF9428CB@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
> > It looks like the patch is also removing the feature from users of
> > Python 2.7.x, though, is it not?
>
> The patch (see
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-03/msg00039.html) does not
> remove any feature. The patch changes the return type of one function
> from "memoryview" to "buffer" for Python 2.7 and below. Both types
> support the "in" keyword, indexed access, length etc. and behave very
> similar. Granted, memoryview has some additional functions that lets
> the user inspect the stride and size of the elements in the buffer,
> but this is a feature we do not use here anyway.
>
> I chose 2.7 as a parting point because that is how it is handled in
> infpy_read_memory in py-inferior.c. Personally, I would leave it that
> way because with "buffer" exposed with Python 2.7 as well as Python
> 2.6 and below, I guess it gets more exposure and testing and won't
> suffer bit-rot as easily.
>
> The patch is tested with Python 2.7 and Python 3.6. I cannot test it
> with Python 2.6 but that should not be necessary as these two versions
> already check both different return types.
OK, that seems sensible for me indeed. Thanks for taking the time
to explain!
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-07 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-23 16:48 Jose E. Marchesi
2017-02-23 17:06 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2017-02-23 22:59 ` Yao Qi
2017-02-24 10:37 ` Wiederhake, Tim
2017-02-24 16:06 ` Yao Qi
2017-02-24 16:14 ` Paul.Koning
2017-02-28 10:53 ` Wiederhake, Tim
2017-02-28 12:51 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2017-03-07 0:21 ` Joel Brobecker
2017-03-07 13:38 ` Wiederhake, Tim
2017-03-07 15:27 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2017-03-03 10:21 ` Yao Qi
2017-03-06 8:56 ` Wiederhake, Tim
2017-03-07 10:32 ` Yao Qi
2017-03-07 17:18 ` Wiederhake, Tim
2017-03-17 15:59 ` Yao Qi
2017-03-17 16:39 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2017-03-20 9:04 ` Yao Qi
2017-03-20 22:44 ` Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170307152749.qqy6gbktvv3uygll@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
--cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
--cc=tim.wiederhake@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox