From: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
To: Walfred Tedeschi <walfred.tedeschi@intel.com>
Cc: palves@redhat.com, eliz@gnu.org, brobecker@adacore.com,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] amd64-linux: expose system register FS_BASE and GS_BASE for Linux.
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 12:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161110123553.GA25185@blade.nx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1478166445-21370-3-git-send-email-walfred.tedeschi@intel.com>
Walfred Tedeschi wrote:
> This patch allows examination of the registers FS_BASE and GS_BASE
> for Linux Systems running on 64bit. Tests for simple read and write
> of the new registers is also added with this patch.
I tried to add this support a while back and failed, so naturally I
think this is amazing--thank you for doing it!
> diff --git a/gdb/amd64-linux-tdep.c b/gdb/amd64-linux-tdep.c
> index 3f2a92b..a8a0b79 100644
> --- a/gdb/amd64-linux-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/amd64-linux-tdep.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,14 @@ int amd64_linux_gregset_reg_offset[] =
> -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
> -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
> -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
> + /* System register added at the end. */
> +#ifdef HAVE_STRUCT_USER_REGS_STRUCT_FS_BASE
> + 21 * 8, 22 * 8, /* fs_base and gs_base. */
> +#else
> + -1, -1, /* fs_base and gs_base. */
> +#endif
> 15 * 8 /* "orig_rax" */
> +
> };
> \f
>
What is the meaning of the comment? And why did you add the new
fields before orig_rax? I'm not disputing what you've done, I'd
just like to understand it.
I'm not a maintainer so can't approve this, but everything looks
right about it in terms of formatting, etc.
Thanks,
Gary
--
http://gbenson.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-10 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-03 9:47 [PATCH 0/2] amd64: add fs_base and gs_base Walfred Tedeschi
2016-11-03 9:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] amd64-linux: expose system register FS_BASE and GS_BASE for Linux Walfred Tedeschi
2016-11-05 14:55 ` John Baldwin
2016-11-07 14:40 ` Tedeschi, Walfred
2016-11-10 12:36 ` Gary Benson [this message]
2016-11-30 13:31 ` Tedeschi, Walfred
2016-11-23 12:02 ` Pedro Alves
2016-11-30 10:29 ` Tedeschi, Walfred
2016-12-07 16:37 ` Pedro Alves
[not found] ` <1478166445-21370-2-git-send-email-walfred.tedeschi@intel.com>
2016-11-10 12:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] gdbserver-amd64: add HAVE_STRUCT_USER_REGS_STRUCT_(GS|FS)_BASE for gdbserver Gary Benson
2016-11-23 12:02 ` Pedro Alves
2016-11-30 14:20 ` [PATCH 0/2] amd64: add fs_base and gs_base Gary Benson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161110123553.GA25185@blade.nx \
--to=gbenson@redhat.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=walfred.tedeschi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox