From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: cel@us.ibm.com (Carl E. Love)
Cc: palves@redhat.com (Pedro Alves),
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com (Ulrich Weigand),
emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Edjunior Barbosa Machado),
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for gdb.base/pc-fp.exp.
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160823163023.AAA2B5BCB@oc7340732750.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1471969030.4102.52.camel@us.ibm.com> from "Carl E. Love" at Aug 23, 2016 09:17:10 AM
Carl Love wrote:
> That said, the code "set_gdbarch_deprecated_fp_regnum
> (gdbarch, PPC_R0_REGNUM + 1);" sets up register r1 as the frame pointer.
> Register r1 is no longer used to hold the frame pointer on Power. By
> removing the fp definition for Power in GDB, it causes GDB to fall back
> to the call get_frame_base_address (frame) which returns the correct value
> depending on the specific senario but most of the time is the DWARF
> canonical frame address.
That's true. In fact, the one place that really cares about the value
returned via $fp is varobj.c:find_frame_addr_in_frame_chain, since you're
supposed to use the value of $fp to identify a frame for MI routines.
And there we explicitly assume that this value matches the value returned
by get_frame_base_address.
> 2016-08-22 Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com>
>
> * rs6000-tdep.c (rs6000_gdbarch_init): Remove deprecated call set_gdbarch_deprecated_fp_regnum()
> from Power architecture initialization function.
Please watch the 80-char line length limit, which holds for the ChangeLog
as well. In fact, the text can be shortened anyway: "deprecated" is
redundant (included in the function name), and likewise is "from Power
architecture initialization function" (you already specified which
function --rs6000_gdbarch_init-- you're modifying). I'd suggest:
* rs6000-tdep.c (rs6000_gdbarch_init): Remove call to
set_gdbarch_deprecated_fp_regnum.
Patch is OK.
Thanks,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-23 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-22 21:16 Carl E. Love
2016-08-22 23:17 ` Pedro Alves
2016-08-23 16:17 ` Carl E. Love
2016-08-23 16:26 ` Luis Machado
2016-08-23 17:06 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-08-23 17:19 ` Luis Machado
2016-08-23 16:30 ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2016-08-24 15:15 ` Carl E. Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160823163023.AAA2B5BCB@oc7340732750.ibm.com \
--to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cel@us.ibm.com \
--cc=emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox