Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
	       Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [testsuite patch] Skip py-unwind.exp on x86_64 -m32
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:34:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160718113348.GA25789@host1.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH=s-PNiyGeCnW4gL9FjycVun2o4Owc_Q-Sdpx-NiWOVvi-qyQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 12:04:27 +0200, Yao Qi wrote:
> This problem is slightly different from "how to run testsuite in cross-arch
> mode", IMO.
> py-unwind.py defines a unwinder, in an arch-specific way.  It has nothing
> wrong.
> However, py-unwind.py should be more portable, which means, it should
> define unwdiner for each arch it supports, and py-unwind.exp or py-unwind.py
> chooses the right python unwinder according to the arch.  IOW, we need to
> define a python unwinder for i386, and use it when arch is i386.

There will always exist at least one unsupported arch for an arch-specific
testcase.  I do not think it makes sense to say that very every testcase in
the testsuite must support very every arch supported by GDB.

So we can say that py-unwind.exp just does not support arch i386.
I do not find that wrong.

Wrong is that it should not FAIL on unsupported arch, it should skip the
testcase on unsupported arch.

The problem here is that py-unwind.exp thinks that it runs on arch x86_64 but
it runs on arch i386.

Even if py-unwind.exp did support i386 it would still FAIL because it would
run the testcase for %rbp/%rsp/%rip.

That is I do not agree with your mail.


In fact I think the cross-arch running of the GDB testsuite should be
described at
	https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/TestingGDB
but currently it is not.  Currently there is only
	https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/TestingGDB#Changing_the_compiler_used_to_build_the_testcases
which uses the simple way I currently use and which breaks the testsuite
needing the ![is_lp64_target] additional test.  Maybe GDB maintainers could
say that the only valid way to run the testsuite cross-arch is properly
setting arget_triplet as Markus Metzger suggests.  (But then I would need to
fix many scripts of mine; also not sure if Sergio's Buildbot runs it that
way.)


Jan


  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-18 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-17 14:30 Jan Kratochvil
2016-07-18 10:04 ` Yao Qi
2016-07-18 11:34   ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2016-07-19 10:06     ` Yao Qi
2016-07-19 18:04       ` Pedro Alves
2016-07-20 11:20         ` Yao Qi
2016-07-20 13:49           ` Pedro Alves
2016-07-20 14:19             ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2016-07-19 19:30     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2016-07-20 13:48       ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160718113348.GA25789@host1.jankratochvil.net \
    --to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox