From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [testsuite patch] Skip py-unwind.exp on x86_64 -m32
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160718113348.GA25789@host1.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH=s-PNiyGeCnW4gL9FjycVun2o4Owc_Q-Sdpx-NiWOVvi-qyQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 12:04:27 +0200, Yao Qi wrote:
> This problem is slightly different from "how to run testsuite in cross-arch
> mode", IMO.
> py-unwind.py defines a unwinder, in an arch-specific way. It has nothing
> wrong.
> However, py-unwind.py should be more portable, which means, it should
> define unwdiner for each arch it supports, and py-unwind.exp or py-unwind.py
> chooses the right python unwinder according to the arch. IOW, we need to
> define a python unwinder for i386, and use it when arch is i386.
There will always exist at least one unsupported arch for an arch-specific
testcase. I do not think it makes sense to say that very every testcase in
the testsuite must support very every arch supported by GDB.
So we can say that py-unwind.exp just does not support arch i386.
I do not find that wrong.
Wrong is that it should not FAIL on unsupported arch, it should skip the
testcase on unsupported arch.
The problem here is that py-unwind.exp thinks that it runs on arch x86_64 but
it runs on arch i386.
Even if py-unwind.exp did support i386 it would still FAIL because it would
run the testcase for %rbp/%rsp/%rip.
That is I do not agree with your mail.
In fact I think the cross-arch running of the GDB testsuite should be
described at
https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/TestingGDB
but currently it is not. Currently there is only
https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/TestingGDB#Changing_the_compiler_used_to_build_the_testcases
which uses the simple way I currently use and which breaks the testsuite
needing the ![is_lp64_target] additional test. Maybe GDB maintainers could
say that the only valid way to run the testsuite cross-arch is properly
setting arget_triplet as Markus Metzger suggests. (But then I would need to
fix many scripts of mine; also not sure if Sergio's Buildbot runs it that
way.)
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-18 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-17 14:30 Jan Kratochvil
2016-07-18 10:04 ` Yao Qi
2016-07-18 11:34 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2016-07-19 10:06 ` Yao Qi
2016-07-19 18:04 ` Pedro Alves
2016-07-20 11:20 ` Yao Qi
2016-07-20 13:49 ` Pedro Alves
2016-07-20 14:19 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2016-07-19 19:30 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2016-07-20 13:48 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160718113348.GA25789@host1.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
--cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox