From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, sergiodj@redhat.com,
Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
keiths@redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFC: branching for GDB 7.11 soon? (possibly Wed)
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 11:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160209115617.GG15342@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160207081230.GA20874@adacore.com>
Hello everyone,
Once again, I am very grateful to everyone who is so responsive
in trying to help us create that branch!
Quick status update again, based on the latest feedback:
> > PR19506 Regression with gdb.Breakpoint("*<addr>")
>
> This lead to a wider fix:
> [PATCH V2 0/4] Add support for "legacy" linespecs
> https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-02/msg00024.html
I took a look over the weekend, and it seems fairly unintrusive.
I propose we push it now. Otherwise, I think it's safe to create
the branch before pushing this patch, and backport afterwards.
> PR 19548 - breakpoint re-set inserts breakpoints when it shouldn't
> Pedro sent a patch:
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-02/msg00014.html
Time to push?
> There is also a crash (regression):
>
> PR 19546 - gdb crash calling exec in the inferior
> Initial guestimate from Pedro:
> | Looks like a regression of the explicit locations work.
> Still in Pedro's court, or could Keith help?
Looks like the fix is fairly straightforward.
> Sergio - would you be able to give us a rough description of how
> good the results are in the buildbots? Anything we should be
> aware of for this release? (Thanks!)
In terms of status:
- C++ build detected a build regression: Fixed, AFAIK.
- Some regressions in Ada due to a testsuite patch
Worse case scenario, we could revert on the branch, if a simple
fix is not available (I am confident, though).
I can't see from the URLs provided what the error looks like,
but it should only affect in-tree build & testing?
So, to summarize, given how easy it can be to break C++ building,
and looking at the issues we want to solve, I can propose the following
plan:
1. Branch now, hold the pre-release;
2. Fix the issues above still pending on both master + branch;
3. Once the issues above are fixed on the branch, issue
the first pre-release.
What do you guys think?
Thanks!
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-09 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-01 3:06 Joel Brobecker
2016-02-01 13:34 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-01 17:04 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-01 19:51 ` Keith Seitz
2016-02-04 0:45 ` [RFC] breakpoints/19474 [was Re: RFC: branching for GDB 7.11 soon? (possibly Wed)] Keith Seitz
2016-02-04 1:33 ` Keith Seitz
2016-02-04 11:05 ` Yao Qi
2016-02-04 12:31 ` Pedro Alves
2016-08-12 12:00 ` Yao Qi
2016-02-07 8:12 ` RFC: branching for GDB 7.11 soon? (possibly Wed) Joel Brobecker
2016-02-08 18:03 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2016-02-08 19:28 ` Keith Seitz
2016-02-08 20:06 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-08 20:11 ` Keith Seitz
2016-02-09 5:35 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2016-02-09 14:15 ` Simon Marchi
2016-02-09 14:18 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-09 14:52 ` Simon Marchi
2016-02-09 18:31 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2016-02-09 11:56 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2016-02-09 12:37 ` Pedro Alves
2016-02-09 22:37 ` Keith Seitz
2016-02-10 3:40 ` Joel Brobecker
2016-02-10 10:04 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160209115617.GG15342@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=keiths@redhat.com \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
--cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox