From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: qiyaoltc@gmail.com (Yao Qi)
Cc: pierre.langlois@arm.com (Pierre Langlois),
gdb-patches@sourceware.org, cole945@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [GDBserver] Fix compiling conditional expressions accessing registers
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150916115014.0A5EA1DA8@oc7340732750.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86y4g6209t.fsf@gmail.com> from "Yao Qi" at Sep 16, 2015 10:15:10 AM
Yao Qi wrote:
> Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois@arm.com> writes:
>
> > This patch fixes this issue by replacing `gdb_agent_get_raw_reg' with a
> > `gdb_agent_get_reg' function which takes the tracepoint context object
> > as argument instead of a raw buffer. Additionally, this patch makes
> > this function architecture independent by initializing the context's
> > regcache early and making `gdb_agent_get_reg' use `collect_register'.
> > As a result, the fast tracepoint context object does not need to
> > contain the raw register buffer.
>
> The fix looks reasonable to me as it makes no sense to keep two copies
> of registers. I go through this patch, and it looks good to me.
It seems to me this was intended as performance optimization to avoid
having to do the full regcache setup every time a tracepoint is hit,
in case we're not actually tracing registers ...
Not sure whether this is a real performance concern for actual use
cases though. I don't have any actual measurements ...
> This patch invalidates Wei-cheng's patch here
> <https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-06/msg00587.html> which is
> already approved but not committed.
>
> If Ulirch/Wei-cheng have no objections, this patch can go in.
Except for the performance question above, I have no objections.
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-16 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-11 17:25 [PATCH 0/2] " Pierre Langlois
2015-09-11 17:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Pierre Langlois
2015-09-16 9:15 ` Yao Qi
2015-09-16 11:50 ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2015-09-16 13:54 ` Pedro Alves
2015-09-16 15:03 ` Yao Qi
2015-09-11 17:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] [testsuite] Add test case for tracepoints with conditions Pierre Langlois
2015-09-16 9:19 ` Yao Qi
2015-09-17 8:51 ` Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150916115014.0A5EA1DA8@oc7340732750.ibm.com \
--to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cole945@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pierre.langlois@arm.com \
--cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox