From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Jon Turney <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixes to Cygwin-specific signal handling
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150414131615.GI4704@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429009382-21040-1-git-send-email-jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk>
Jon,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:03:02PM +0100, Jon Turney wrote:
> Originally by cgf, this patch has been carried in Cygwin's gdb package
> for a few years. I've cleaned it up a bit and revised it for master.
>
> Without this patch, it's impossible to usefully run the testsuite on
> Cygwin.
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> 2015-04-11 Jon Turney <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk>
>
> * windows-nat.c: Replace have_saved_context with signal_thread_id
> throughout.
> (thread_rec): Don't retrieve context if we have a saved one.
> Ignore 'Invalid Handle' errors.
> (handle_output_debug_string): Mark signal context as not to be
> written to inferior by windows_continue() or windows_resume().
> (get_windows_debug_event): Replace retval with thread_id
> throughout. Don't clear any saved context.
Overall, the patch looks reasonable to me. But I think there are
at least 3 independent changes, and it would be nice to split those
two out, for a couple of reasons:
1. It allows you to explain the nature of the problem, from the user's
standpoint, that the patch is fixing (ie, what user-visible
symptoms it fixes);
2. it allows us to see how each problem is fixed, and to deal with
each issue separately.
The three issues I view as independent:
a. ignoring "invalid handle" errors;
b. unsetting saved_context.ContextFlags
c. the renaming of have_saved_context into signal_thread_id
so you can compare the current thread id with the saved
signal_thread_id.
A few minor comments below.
> @@ -849,8 +853,12 @@ handle_output_debug_string (struct target_waitstatus *ourstatus)
> &saved_context,
> __COPY_CONTEXT_SIZE, &n)
> && n == __COPY_CONTEXT_SIZE)
> - have_saved_context = 1;
> - current_event.dwThreadId = retval;
> + {
> + signal_thread_id = retval;
> + saved_context.ContextFlags = 0; /* Don't attempt to call SetThreadContext */
Can you move the comment just above the statement so as to avoid
exceeding the maximum line length, and also explain why we should
not call SetThreadContext?
> @@ -1330,7 +1338,6 @@ get_windows_debug_event (struct target_ops *ops,
> event_code = current_event.dwDebugEventCode;
> ourstatus->kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_SPURIOUS;
> th = NULL;
> - have_saved_context = 0;
Normally, there is a corresponding addition that sets signal_thread_id
to zero. This leads me to be believe that there might be an additional
user-visible symptom that this patch fixes?
> @@ -1501,12 +1508,12 @@ get_windows_debug_event (struct target_ops *ops,
> else
> {
> inferior_ptid = ptid_build (current_event.dwProcessId, 0,
> - retval);
> - current_thread = th ?: thread_rec (current_event.dwThreadId, TRUE);
> + thread_id);
> + current_thread = th ?: thread_rec (thread_id, TRUE);
I know you are just repeating what was there before, but I don't think
this is the clearest way to do things. GDB Coding Standards also do not
allow assignments within conditions. I suggest instead:
current_thread = th;
if (!current_thread)
thread_rec (thread_id, TRUE);
> out:
> - return retval;
> + return (int) thread_id;
I'm wondering whether the cast is actually necessary?
Also, it looks like the function's comment might be stale:
/* Get the next event from the child. Return 1 if the event requires
handling by WFI (or whatever). */
static int
get_windows_debug_event (struct target_ops *ops,
int pid, struct target_waitstatus *ourstatus)
Would you mind fixing that?
Thanks,
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-14 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-14 11:03 Jon Turney
2015-04-14 13:16 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2015-04-14 14:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-04-16 19:24 ` Jon TURNEY
2015-04-22 14:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2015-04-16 19:23 ` [PATCH 0/5] Fix to Cygwin-specific signal handling (v2) Jon Turney
2015-04-16 19:23 ` [PATCH 2/5] windows-nat: Cleanups in get_windows_debug_event Jon Turney
2015-04-22 13:52 ` Joel Brobecker
2015-04-16 19:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] windows-nat: Don't use ternary conditional operator " Jon Turney
2015-04-22 13:50 ` Joel Brobecker
2015-04-16 19:24 ` [PATCH 3/5] windows-nat: Fix misspelling in debug output Jon Turney
2015-04-22 13:55 ` Joel Brobecker
2015-04-16 19:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] windows-nat: Don't change current_event.dwThreadId in handle_output_debug_string() Jon Turney
2015-04-22 14:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2015-04-16 19:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] windows-nat: Report an error if ContinueDebugEvent() fails Jon Turney
2015-04-22 14:10 ` Joel Brobecker
2015-06-10 13:06 ` [PATCH 0/5] Fix to Cygwin-specific signal handling (v2) Jon TURNEY
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150414131615.GI4704@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox