Re: [PATCH] Share the "multi_line" helper among all Ada testcases

[Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>]

> Meanwhile, we grew many tests that do [join [list ... "\r\n"]],
> like this:
> 
> # start by listing all functions
> gdb_test "record function-call-history /ci 1, +20" [join [list \
>   "1\tmain\tinst 1,1" \
>   "2\t  fun4\tinst 2,4" \
>   "3\t    fun1\tinst 5,8" \
>   "4\t  fun4\tinst 9,9" \
>   "5\t    fun2\tinst 10,12" \
>   "6\t      fun1\tinst 13,16" \
>   "7\t    fun2\tinst 17,18" \
>   "8\t  fun4\tinst 19,19" \
>   "9\t    fun3\tinst 20,22" \
>   "10\t      fun1\tinst 23,26" \
>   "11\t    fun3\tinst 27,27" \
>   "12\t      fun2\tinst 28,30" \
>   "13\t        fun1\tinst 31,34" \
>   "14\t      fun2\tinst 35,36" \
>   "15\t    fun3\tinst 37,38" \
>   "16\t  fun4\tinst 39,40" \
>   ] "\r\n"]
> 
> Your multi_line looks like almost the same, except that it's
> a tiny bit more lax:
> 
> proc multi_line { args } {
>     return [join $args "\[\r\n\]*"]
> }
> 
> That will accept _no_ newline between list elements, and
> multiple newlines too.  How about making multi_line join
> with strict "\r\n" too?  Then if you need to match one
> empty line, you can do:
> 
>          [multi_line "line1" \
> 	             ""
>                      "line3"]
> 
> and if you need multiple, you can always do:
> 
>          [multi_line "line1" \
> 	             "\[\r\n\]*"
>                      "lineNN"]

Very good suggestion, I like it! Pierre-Marie?

-- 
Joel