Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: cole945@gmail.com (Wei-cheng Wang)
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 v3] Process record support for PowerPC
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 18:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201412171841.sBHIfGSA011030@d03av02.boulder.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5491B840.5030603@gmail.com> from "Wei-cheng Wang" at Dec 18, 2014 01:07:12 AM

Wei-cheng Wang wrote:

> 2014-12-06  Wei-cheng Wang  <cole945@gmail.com>
> 	    Ulrich Weigand  <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
> 
> 	* configure.tgt (powerpc*-*-linux): Add linux-record.o to
> 	gdb_target_obs.
> 	(ppc_linux_record_tdep, ppc64_linux_record_tdep): New for linux syscall
> 	record.
> 	(ppc_canonicalize_syscall, ppc_linux_syscall_record,
> 	ppc_linux_record_signal, ppc_init_linux_record_tdep): New functions.
> 	(ppc_linux_init_abi): Set process_record, process_record_signal.
> 	* ppc-tdep.h (struct gdbarch_tdep): Add ppc_syscall_record and
> 	ppc_linux_record_tdep to gdbarch_tdep.
> 	(ppc_process_record): New declaration.
> 	* rs6000-tdep.c (ppc_record_vsr, ppc_process_record_op4,
> 	ppc_process_record_op19, ppc_process_record_op31,
> 	ppc_process_record_op59, ppc_process_record_op60,
> 	ppc_process_record_op63, ppc_process_record): New functions.
> 
> changelog for testsuite
> 
> 2014-12-06  Wei-cheng Wang  <cole945@gmail.com>
> 
> 	* lib/gdb.exp (supports_process_record): Return true for
> 	powerpc*-*-linux*.
> 	(supports_reverse): Likewise.

This looks all very good now, except that:

> +static void
> +ppc_init_linux_record_tdep (struct linux_record_tdep *record_tdep,
> +			    int wordsize)
> +{
> +  /* Simply return if it had been initialized.  */
> +  if (record_tdep->size_pointer != 0)
> +    return;
> +
> +  /* These values are the size of the type that will be used in a system
> +     call.  They are obtained from Linux Kernel source.  */
> +
> +  record_tdep->size_pointer = wordsize;
> +  record_tdep->size__old_kernel_stat = 32;
> +  record_tdep->size_tms = 32;
> +  record_tdep->size_loff_t = 8;
> +  record_tdep->size_flock = 32;
[...]

you seem to have removed all the 32-bit struct sizes here.  Your last
iteration had different values for many of those structs for wordsize 4
vs. wordsize 8, and I think we need to keep them.

I had suggested to remove the gdbarch calls, but I was thinking instead
of a structure along the lines of

  if (wordsize == 8)
    {
      record_tdep->size_pointer = 8;
      record_tdep->size__old_kernel_stat = 32;
      record_tdep->size_tms = 32;
      record_tdep->size_loff_t = 8;
      record_tdep->size_flock = 32;
[...]
    }
  else if (wordsize == 4)
    {
      record_tdep->size_pointer = 4;
      record_tdep->size__old_kernel_stat = 32;
      record_tdep->size_tms = 16;
      record_tdep->size_loff_t = 8;
      record_tdep->size_flock = 16;
[...]
    }
  else
     internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE_, _("unexpected wordsize"));

The patch is OK with that change.

Thanks again,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com


  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-17 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-06 18:00 [PATCH 2/3 v2] " Wei-cheng Wang
2014-12-08 19:12 ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-12-17 17:07   ` [PATCH 2/3 v3] " Wei-cheng Wang
2014-12-17 18:41     ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2014-12-25 17:27       ` [PATCH 2/3 v4] " Wei-cheng Wang
2015-01-01 14:19         ` Ulrich Weigand
2015-01-04 16:27           ` Wei-cheng Wang
2015-01-06 12:42             ` Ulrich Weigand
2015-01-17  6:02               ` Wei-cheng Wang
2015-01-17 11:47                 ` Ulrich Weigand
2015-01-17 18:53                   ` Joel Brobecker
2015-01-17 21:20                     ` Broken build: rs6000-tdep.c: 32-bit host --enable-targets=all --enable-64-bit-bfd [Re: [PATCH 2/3 v4] Process record support for PowerPC] Jan Kratochvil
2015-01-18  4:47                       ` Wei-cheng Wang
2015-01-18  7:01                         ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-01-18  8:01                           ` Wei-cheng Wang
2015-01-19  7:48                             ` Joel Brobecker
2015-01-19 16:10                               ` [PATCH 2/3 v4] Process record support for PowerPC Wei-cheng Wang
2015-01-19 18:05                                 ` Ulrich Weigand
2015-01-20 16:03                                   ` Wei-cheng Wang
2015-01-20 18:14                                     ` Ulrich Weigand
2015-01-26 17:19                                       ` Ulrich Weigand
2015-01-26 17:19                                         ` Wei-cheng Wang
2015-01-26 19:16                                           ` Doug Evans
2015-01-26 20:29                                             ` Doug Evans

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201412171841.sBHIfGSA011030@d03av02.boulder.ibm.com \
    --to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cole945@gmail.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox