Re: [PATCH] Delete struct inferior_suspend_state

[Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>]

> That's a general concern, yes.
> My comments in this thread are confined to the particular case at hand.

Jan was saying that he does not mind it if the code gets removed.
So I think we can remove it.

Jan also asked that we add a comment to mark the location where
the code should be add should we need it. I don't mind, but
these are about something that has become a fairly general and
standard paradigm, so I don't personally really see much usefulness
in that, while things may change in the future, making those
comments incomplete or incorrect.

Commented-out code should be avoided, and removed if found.
There are no absolute rules as far as I am concerned, so we may
one day face a situation where it's best to ignore that rule.
But we'd have to justify why that's best before going ahead.

In this particular case IMO, the convenience doesn't justify us
keeping the code around, so I would go ahead removing it.

-- 
Joel