Re: [PATCH v2] Fix several "set remote foo-packet on/off" commands.

[Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>]

> >> I'd be fine with either:
> >>
> >> - restoring things to how they've "always" been immediately.
> >> That is, push the patch below.  We can then incrementally add the
> >> missing associated commands, along with corresponding manual and
> >> possibly testsuite changes/additions, as a non-priority task.
> >>
> >> - or, adding all the missing commands now, and add an assertion just
> >> like in the patch below, but with no exception list, of course.
> >> (but TBC, I can't offer to work on that myself now.)
> > 
> > Either approach would be fine with me too. I could even see a two-step
> > approach where we apply your first patch as a stop-gap, and then
> > implement everything as a setting (I think having the setting for
> > every packet could prove useful to interact with difficult remote
> > stubs).
> 
> Alright, so I just went ahead and pushed the patch in.

Thanks, Pedro!

-- 
Joel