Re: [PATCH v2] Fix several "set remote foo-packet on/off" commands.

[Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>]

Hi Pedro,

> Bummer, sorry for the trouble.

No problem at all!

> I think the design is sound.  See more info in the patch below.
> 
> I'd be fine with either:
> 
> - restoring things to how they've "always" been immediately.
> That is, push the patch below.  We can then incrementally add the
> missing associated commands, along with corresponding manual and
> possibly testsuite changes/additions, as a non-priority task.
> 
> - or, adding all the missing commands now, and add an assertion just
> like in the patch below, but with no exception list, of course.
> (but TBC, I can't offer to work on that myself now.)

Either approach would be fine with me too. I could even see a two-step
approach where we apply your first patch as a stop-gap, and then
implement everything as a setting (I think having the setting for
every packet could prove useful to interact with difficult remote
stubs).

Thanks!
-- 
Joel