From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
Cc: "gp >> \"gdb-patches@sourceware.org ml\"" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix c++/16253 (tag/variable name collision)
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140326133202.GQ4282@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5331BB0D.4010606@redhat.com>
> In this case, add_nonlocal_symbols is calling the qf
> map_matching_symbols method which is calling match_partial_symbol.
> Since this method now does strict matches against domain, an
> explicit check for STRUCT_DOMAIN matches must be added.
>
> Give this amendment a shot and see how it goes. I suspect there are
> probably one or two more places where this occurs. [The easiest
> thing to do is audit any function which uses "VAR_DOMAIN".]
I was thinking of the very same patch :), and it tested fine.
Can you remove the curly braces in the second call? They should
be unnecessary in this case, and our CS asks us to avoid them
in that situation (the only exception is when the body also
contains a comment).
Thanks!
> + {
> + objfile->sf->qf->map_matching_symbols (objfile, name, domain, global,
> + aux_add_nonlocal_symbols,
> + &data, wild_match, NULL);
> + if (domain == VAR_DOMAIN)
> + {
> + objfile->sf->qf->map_matching_symbols (objfile, name,
> + STRUCT_DOMAIN, global,
> + aux_add_nonlocal_symbols,
> + &data, wild_match, NULL);
> + }
> + }
> else
> - objfile->sf->qf->map_matching_symbols (objfile, name, domain, global,
> - aux_add_nonlocal_symbols, &data,
> - full_match, compare_names);
> + {
> + objfile->sf->qf->map_matching_symbols (objfile, name, domain, global,
> + aux_add_nonlocal_symbols,
> + &data, full_match,
> + compare_names);
> + if (domain == VAR_DOMAIN)
> + {
> + objfile->sf->qf->map_matching_symbols (objfile, name,
> + STRUCT_DOMAIN, global,
> + aux_add_nonlocal_symbols,
> + &data, full_match,
> + compare_names);
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> if (num_defns_collected (obstackp) == 0 && global && !is_wild_match)
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-26 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-21 18:12 Keith Seitz
2014-03-24 14:15 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-03-25 18:11 ` Keith Seitz
2014-03-26 13:32 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2014-03-26 13:40 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-03-26 15:34 ` Keith Seitz
2014-04-10 18:54 ` Keith Seitz
2014-04-10 20:29 ` Tom Tromey
2014-05-28 17:55 ` Doug Evans
2014-04-17 19:03 ` Regression for gdb.cp/koenig.exp: p entry (c) [Re: [RFA] Fix c++/16253 (tag/variable name collision)] Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140326133202.GQ4282@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=keiths@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox