From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] nameless LOAD_DLL_DEBUG_EVENT causes ntdll.dll to be missing
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 11:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131209113333.GC4011@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52A073CC.3050009@redhat.com>
> :-) I'd be good to have this new info distilled as a comment
> in the code, IMO.
Excellent suggestion, of course. I, with my incessant asking for
comments, should have thought of it too! ;-)
[regarding gdbserver]
> I think the fix is very low risk, and could go in with minimal
> testing.
OK - will work on that ASAP.
> > In the meantime, does the GDB-side fix look OK to commit to you
> > (modulo the small issue you raised)?
>
> Yes.
>
> One nit -- does ntdll.dll appears at the end of the
> loaded list with this fix, or at the beginning? I'd think
> it should be the first dll in "info sharedlibrary", assuming
> that that's what we see on older Windows versions.
I think this is going to be difficult, unless we defer the notification
for the other shared libraries - in which case we're doing what I wanted
to do, but after 7.7 gets cut, which is to ignore LOAD_DLL_DEBUG_EVENTs
until the end of do_initial_windows_stuff, and then just iterate over
all modules to generate the SOs.
The reason why I think it would be difficult is because, when a new
shared object is loaded, we get a TARGET_WAITKIND_LOADED, which
I think eventually leads us to:
-> handle_solib_event ()
-> solib_add (NULL, 0, ¤t_target, auto_solib_add);
-> update_solib_list (from_tty, target);
And looking at update_solib_list, it calls current_sos, and then
adds new SOs at the end (via the VEC_push). On top of that, an
easier issue that we'll have to handle in windows-nat the adding
of the new SO at the start of the SO list, rather than then end.
Since this is mostly cosmetic and only affects Windows 2012,
I would leave it alone until we have more leeway towards simplifying
the DLL handling.
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-09 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-03 11:31 Joel Brobecker
2013-12-03 19:51 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-03 20:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-12-05 10:54 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-12-05 12:38 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-09 11:33 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2013-12-09 17:08 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-10 10:06 ` pushed: " Joel Brobecker
2013-12-10 10:06 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-12-10 10:56 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-12-10 13:41 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-10 13:58 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-12 18:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-12-12 18:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-12-12 19:08 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-12 22:06 ` Tom Tromey
2013-12-13 10:06 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-13 11:04 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-12-13 11:21 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-13 19:38 ` Tom Tromey
2013-12-13 14:17 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-12-13 14:42 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-13 15:45 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131209113333.GC4011@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox