From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: Raunaq 12 <raunaq12@in.ibm.com>,
GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,
Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA/ppc-aix] fix thread support breakage (was: "Re: [PATCH 4/5] powerpc64-aix ptrace64 when defined.")
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130823133415.GD5221@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGWvnymjyCc9vFbh4+eNdr2mdxJYU0=LFC1-itC38SDKfRaG-w@mail.gmail.com>
> > gdb/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * rs6000-nat.c (rs6000_ptrace32): Cast "addr" to "uintptr_t"
> > instead of "long long" in call to ptrace64.
> >
> > Tested on ppc-aix in full 32bit mode (both GDB and inferior are
> > 32bit). I think the other scenario would be 64bit GDB debugging
> > a 32bit inferior, but I don't have a 64bit compiler to try it.
> >
> > I'd like to commit this patch, unless there are comments/suggestions.
>
> LGTM.
Thanks :)
> Is there a testcase that can be added to the GDB testsuite to catch
> this type of regression?
All testcases involving thread support should reveal this type of
failure. I cannot remember exactly how this patch was tested, but
ISTR that it couldn't be tested through the official testsuite,
for some reasons that were deemed reasonable...
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-23 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAGWvnynVeLt6F-QREsP_CtQvwvtZgwqHxtcS6pn58LMf=AX=GA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-08-12 12:02 ` [PATCH 4/5] powerpc64-aix ptrace64 when defined Raunaq 12
2013-08-12 15:53 ` David Edelsohn
2013-08-12 12:11 ` Raunaq 12
2013-08-12 19:43 ` David Edelsohn
2013-08-22 23:32 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-08-23 0:48 ` [RFA/ppc-aix] fix thread support breakage (was: "Re: [PATCH 4/5] powerpc64-aix ptrace64 when defined.") Joel Brobecker
2013-08-23 7:23 ` David Edelsohn
2013-08-23 13:34 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
[not found] ` <CAGWvnyna5R2AR0imAC4W+aCJXPFjwPm+45yP9VOgkO68T7sF7w@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <OFC7611E7B.F19F366D-ON65257BE2.003745A0-65257BE2.00386093@in.ibm.com>
2013-09-17 18:38 ` [RFA/ppc-aix] fix thread support breakage Tom Tromey
2013-08-29 21:03 ` Checked in: [RFA/ppc-aix] fix thread support breakage (was: "Re: [PATCH 4/5] powerpc64-aix ptrace64 when defined.") Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130823133415.GD5221@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=raunaq12@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox