Re: [PATCH] print_frame add info

[Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>]

On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:52:21 +0100, Douglas, William wrote:
> Okay so would a patch be acceptable with iam's original changes
> getting updated per that thread then?

The original iam's patch is being reworked in
	archer-jankratochvil-absdir
	http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/ArcherBranchManagement
and hopefully to be finished this week, or maybe the next one.

Currently it has
	set filename-display {absolute|basename|relative}
with (current) default "relative" but for the shared libraries "relative" has
no meaning and moreover we want to also have an option "none" (the current
one).

So I see I should rename the option above rather to "set source-filename" as
"filename" is too ambiguous.

And this discussed feature should be unrelated to it with new option:
	set solib-filename {none|absolute|basename}
with current default still "none", or something like that, what do you think?

Both options should default to something else than what is the current
behavior but that should be done in a separate patch afterwards.


Thanks,
Jan