Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] PR gdb/12776 is now fixed as well; adjust testsuite
@ 2012-10-25  8:01 Mark Kettenis
  2012-10-25  8:59 ` Mark Kettenis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Kettenis @ 2012-10-25  8:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

Missed this yesterday.

2012-10-24  Mark Kettenis  <kettenis@gnu.org>

	* gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: PR gdb/12783 is now fixed.

Index: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/callfuncs.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.55
diff -u -p -r1.55 callfuncs.exp
--- gdb.base/callfuncs.exp	24 Oct 2012 13:45:51 -0000	1.55
+++ gdb.base/callfuncs.exp	24 Oct 2012 14:57:59 -0000
@@ -245,15 +245,9 @@ proc do_function_calls {} {
 	gdb_test "p t_structs_fc(struct_val1)" ".*= 3 \\+ 3 \\* I" \
 	    "call inferior func with struct - returns float _Complex"
 
-	if [is_x86_like_target] {
-	    setup_kfail gdb/12783 "*-*-*"
-	}
 	gdb_test "p t_structs_dc(struct_val1)" ".*= 4 \\+ 4 \\* I" \
 	    "call inferior func with struct - returns double _Complex"
 
-	if [is_x86_like_target] {
-	    setup_kfail gdb/12783 "*-*-*"
-	}
 	gdb_test "p t_structs_ldc(struct_val1)" "= 5 \\+ 5 \\* I" \
 	    "call inferior func with struct - returns long double _Complex"
     }


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] PR gdb/12776 is now fixed as well; adjust testsuite
  2012-10-25  8:01 [PATCH] PR gdb/12776 is now fixed as well; adjust testsuite Mark Kettenis
@ 2012-10-25  8:59 ` Mark Kettenis
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Kettenis @ 2012-10-25  8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:01:03 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
> 
> Missed this yesterday.
> 
> 2012-10-24  Mark Kettenis  <kettenis@gnu.org>
> 
> 	* gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: PR gdb/12783 is now fixed.

Ugh, pasted the wrong ChangeLog entry.  Should have been:

2012-10-25  Mark Kettenis  <kettenis@gnu.org>

        * gdb.base/varargs.exp: PR gdb/12776 is now fixed.

(which is what I actually committed).

Seems I also missed the equivalent KPASSes on amd64, so I committed
the diff below as well.


2012-10-25  Mark Kettenis  <kettenis@openbsd.nfra.nl>

	* gdb.base/varargs.exp: PR gdb/12790 is now fixed.

Index: gdb.base/varargs.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/varargs.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -p -r1.20 varargs.exp
--- gdb.base/varargs.exp	25 Oct 2012 08:00:58 -0000	1.20
+++ gdb.base/varargs.exp	25 Oct 2012 08:53:13 -0000
@@ -116,17 +116,14 @@ if [support_complex_tests] {
     global gdb_prompt
 
     set test "print find_max_float_real(4, fc1, fc2, fc3, fc4)"
-    setup_kfail_for_target gdb/12790 "x86_64-*-*"
     setup_kfail_for_target gdb/12791 "arm*-*-*"
     gdb_test $test ".*= 4 \\+ 4 \\* I" $test
 
     set test "print find_max_double_real(4, dc1, dc2, dc3, dc4)"
-    setup_kfail_for_target gdb/12790 "x86_64-*-*"
     setup_kfail_for_target gdb/12791 "arm*-*-*"
     gdb_test $test ".*= 4 \\+ 4 \\* I" $test
 
     set test "print find_max_long_double_real(4, ldc1, ldc2, ldc3, ldc4)"
-    setup_kfail_for_target gdb/12790 "x86_64-*-*"
     setup_kfail_for_target gdb/12791 "arm*-*-*"
     gdb_test $test ".*= 4 \\+ 4 \\* I" $test
 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-25  8:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-25  8:01 [PATCH] PR gdb/12776 is now fixed as well; adjust testsuite Mark Kettenis
2012-10-25  8:59 ` Mark Kettenis

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox