From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: macro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA 1/2] mips: Switch inferior function calls to ON_STACK method.
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 14:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120509143537.GH15555@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201205090823.q498Njc7019605@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
I have now checked this patch in.
> Not too long ago, Jan Kratochvil pointed out a problem with
> AT_ENTRY_POINT.
Yeah - I thought we had fixed that by switching the x86/amd64 targets
to using ON_STACK. But then when I grep'ed around, I didn't find that.
So I thought perhaps we went a different route, because I was sure we
had checked a fix in. But in fact, reviewing the history, I think
that this issue is still open, probably one of these low-priority
issues that one looks at when there is free moment.
In my opinion, the point about not being able to write the breakpoint
if the program is executed from ROM, combined with the fact that entry
points may have CFI info, clinches it.
OK - now that this is out of the way, which comments did we want to add?
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-09 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-03 19:03 Getting rid of AT_SYMBOL inferior call method Joel Brobecker
2012-05-03 19:03 ` [RFA 1/2] mips: Switch inferior function calls to ON_STACK method Joel Brobecker
2012-05-03 21:09 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-03 21:50 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-03 23:29 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-04 20:58 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-04 21:19 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-05-04 23:25 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-05 11:45 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-05-08 15:08 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-08 16:06 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-08 20:26 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-08 20:43 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-08 22:08 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-09 7:32 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-09 8:24 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-05-09 9:14 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-09 16:08 ` Tom Tromey
2012-05-09 14:35 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2012-05-14 9:44 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-14 15:01 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-14 16:48 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-06-11 10:14 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-09 6:21 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-04 22:41 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-04 21:34 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-05-05 1:31 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-03 21:44 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-05-03 21:58 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-04 2:11 ` Yao Qi
2012-05-03 22:03 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-03 19:03 ` [commit 2/2] Remove AT_SYMBOL Joel Brobecker
2012-05-09 14:37 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120509143537.GH15555@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=macro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox