Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: dje@google.com, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org,        mark@klomp.org
Subject: Re: [RFA take 6] Allow setting breakpoints on inline functions (PR	10738)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120315181002.GA10803@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <833999wxkt.fsf@gnu.org>

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:51:17 +0000
> > From: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
> >         Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
> > 
> > Jan, Doug, Eli, how do you feel about "possibly inconsistent"?
> > 
> > The option text would become:
> > 
> > "Do not reject possibly inconsistent .gdb_index sections."
> 
> The meaning of that is that the sections being skipped are
> inconsistent within themselves.  If that's really what you meant,
> I'm fine with the change.

The issue is that with older index section the information in the
.gdb_index sections is not consistent with the information that GDB
would generate from the DWARF.  Does that make sense?

Thanks,
Gary

-- 
http://gbenson.net/


  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-15 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-14 13:38 Gary Benson
2012-03-14 17:51 ` Doug Evans
2012-03-14 17:55   ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-14 17:58     ` Doug Evans
2012-03-15 10:51       ` Gary Benson
2012-03-15 10:52         ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-15 16:51         ` Doug Evans
2012-03-15 18:04         ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-03-15 18:10           ` Gary Benson [this message]
2012-03-15 18:15             ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-03-15 18:26               ` Gary Benson
2012-03-15 18:31               ` Pedro Alves
2012-03-15 18:36                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-03-15 18:40                   ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-15 19:29                     ` Gary Benson
2012-03-15 19:34                       ` Doug Evans
2012-03-15 19:52                         ` Pedro Alves
2012-03-15 20:06                           ` Pedro Alves
2012-03-16 10:03                             ` Gary Benson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120315181002.GA10803@redhat.com \
    --to=gbenson@redhat.com \
    --cc=dje@google.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=mark@klomp.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox