From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [patch] Fix CU relative vs. absolute offsets [Re: RFC: problem with DW_OP_GNU_deref_type and dwarf's get_base_type callback]
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120307170940.GA22619@host2.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120305223429.GM2867@adacore.com>
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 23:34:29 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> I tested the change, and lo and behold, on x86_64-linux, I get the
> following fixes:
>
> * gdb.arch:
> +------------+------------+----------------------------------------------------+
> | FAIL | PASS | amd64-entry-value.exp: entry: bt |
I do not understand how it can happen. amd64-entry-value.exp uses precompiled
amd64-entry-value.s (unless you use runtest COMPILE=1) and sure it fully
PASSed+PASSes for me.
There are more issues of this kind.
I will re-review the patch later but it seems to me these fixes are needed.
No regressions on {x86_64,x86_64-m32,i686}-fedora17-linux-gnu and with
-gdwarf-4 -fdebug-types-section.
It looks as if some of the GDB features have never worked in real world - just
in the testcase which have single CU. :-)
Thanks,
Jan
2012-03-07 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Fix CU relative vs. absolute DIE offsets.
* dwarf2loc.h (dwarf2_fetch_die_location_block): Rename parameter
offset to offset_in_cu.
* dwarf2read.c (process_enumeration_scope): Add CU offset to
TYPE_OFFSET.
(dwarf2_fetch_die_location_block): Rename parameter offset to
offset_in_cu. New variable offset, add CU offset to OFFSET_IN_CU.
--- a/gdb/dwarf2loc.h
+++ b/gdb/dwarf2loc.h
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ const gdb_byte *dwarf2_find_location_expression
CORE_ADDR pc);
struct dwarf2_locexpr_baton dwarf2_fetch_die_location_block
- (unsigned int offset, struct dwarf2_per_cu_data *per_cu,
+ (unsigned int offset_in_cu, struct dwarf2_per_cu_data *per_cu,
CORE_ADDR (*get_frame_pc) (void *baton),
void *baton);
--- a/gdb/dwarf2read.c
+++ b/gdb/dwarf2read.c
@@ -8031,7 +8031,8 @@ process_enumeration_scope (struct die_info *die, struct dwarf2_cu *cu)
= lookup_signatured_type_at_offset (dwarf2_per_objfile->objfile,
cu->per_cu->debug_types_section,
cu->per_cu->offset);
- if (type_sig->type_offset != die->offset)
+ if (type_sig->per_cu.offset + type_sig->type_offset
+ != die->offset)
return;
}
@@ -14202,11 +14203,12 @@ follow_die_ref (struct die_info *src_die, struct attribute *attr,
dwarf2_locexpr_baton->data has lifetime of PER_CU->OBJFILE. */
struct dwarf2_locexpr_baton
-dwarf2_fetch_die_location_block (unsigned int offset,
+dwarf2_fetch_die_location_block (unsigned int offset_in_cu,
struct dwarf2_per_cu_data *per_cu,
CORE_ADDR (*get_frame_pc) (void *baton),
void *baton)
{
+ unsigned int offset = per_cu->offset + offset_in_cu;
struct dwarf2_cu *cu;
struct die_info *die;
struct attribute *attr;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-07 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-05 22:34 RFC: problem with DW_OP_GNU_deref_type and dwarf's get_base_type callback Joel Brobecker
2012-03-06 20:25 ` Tom Tromey
2012-03-06 23:46 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-03-07 17:10 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2012-03-07 17:13 ` [patch 2/2] typedef-checking for CU relative vs. absolute offsets [Re: RFC: problem with DW_OP_GNU_deref_type and dwarf's get_base_type callback] Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-07 18:58 ` Doug Evans
2012-03-07 19:10 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-07 19:29 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-08 21:54 ` Tom Tromey
2012-03-08 21:56 ` Doug Evans
2012-03-07 19:07 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-03-07 19:16 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-08 21:53 ` Tom Tromey
2012-03-09 19:40 ` cu_offset vs. sect_offset field names bikeshedding [Re: [patch 2/2] typedef-checking for CU relative vs. absolute offsets] Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-09 19:52 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-03-19 20:02 ` [commit] [patch 2/2] typedef-checking for CU relative vs. absolute offsets Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-09 19:56 ` cu_offset vs. sect_offset field names bikeshedding [Re: [patch 2/2] typedef-checking for CU relative vs. absolute offsets] Tom Tromey
2012-03-07 18:57 ` [patch] Fix CU relative vs. absolute offsets [Re: RFC: problem with DW_OP_GNU_deref_type and dwarf's get_base_type callback] Joel Brobecker
2012-03-07 19:47 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-03-08 19:40 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120307170940.GA22619@host2.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox