From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201112141734.43226.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201112141722.27572.pedro@codesourcery.com>
On Wednesday 14 December 2011 17:22:27, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:26:03 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > > +amd64_linux_prepare_to_resume (struct lwp_info *lwp)
> > > {
> > > - struct lwp_info *lp;
> > > + int clear_status = 0;
> > >
> > > - ALL_LWPS (lp)
> > > + if (lwp->arch_private->debug_registers_changed)
> > > {
> > > - unsigned long value;
> > > -
> > > - value = amd64_linux_dr_get (lp->ptid, DR_STATUS);
> > > - value &= ~mask;
> > > - amd64_linux_dr_set (lp->ptid, DR_STATUS, value);
> > > + struct i386_debug_reg_state *state = i386_debug_reg_state ();
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = DR_FIRSTADDR; i <= DR_LASTADDR; i++)
> > > + if (state->dr_ref_count[i] > 0)
> > > + {
> > > + amd64_linux_dr_set (lwp->ptid, i, state->dr_mirror[i]);
> >
> > FYI this way it will leave non-zero DR_FIRSTADDR...DR_LASTADDR after detaching
> > from the inferior. This is not a bug, just that it may look as a sort of
> > regression. I do not think a fix - clearing them - is required.
>
> Agreed. But there's actually a related bug here, that I had thought
> of fixing, then forgot. GDBserver has this bug too; I'll fix it in a bit.
Like below. Now applied.
> We need to call prepare_to_resume just before detaching, to clear
> the previously active debug registers in DR_CONTROL, otherwise, the
> inferior dies with SIGTRAP just after detaching.
>
> That is:
>
> (gdb) watch j
> or
> (gdb) hbreak foo
> (gdb) si
> watchpoints inserted
> (gdb) delete
> *deletes the watchpoints from global mirror, but doesn't update the threads' copies.*
> (gdb) detach
> *inferior trips on old watchpoints -> SIGTRAP death *
>
gdb/gdbserver/
2011-12-14 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
* linux-low.c (linux_detach_one_lwp): Call
the_low_target.prepare_to_resume before detaching.
---
gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c b/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
index 8afbc8b..43d88fa 100644
--- a/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
+++ b/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
@@ -918,6 +918,8 @@ linux_detach_one_lwp (struct inferior_list_entry *entry, void *args)
get_lwp_thread (lwp));
/* Finally, let it resume. */
+ if (the_low_target.prepare_to_resume != NULL)
+ the_low_target.prepare_to_resume (lwp);
ptrace (PTRACE_DETACH, lwpid_of (lwp), 0, 0);
delete_lwp (lwp);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-14 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-05 16:46 Pedro Alves
2011-12-05 17:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-09 16:30 ` New tests to watch regions larger than a machine word (Re: [PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode) Pedro Alves
2011-12-09 19:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-13 16:12 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-05 21:24 ` [PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-09 16:45 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-09 16:47 ` Tristan Gingold
2011-12-09 19:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-13 16:26 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-11 23:39 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-12 11:53 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-12 14:49 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-12 0:14 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-12 17:23 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-12 18:38 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-12 20:14 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-12 20:30 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-13 17:24 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-13 18:49 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-13 19:25 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-16 16:16 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-20 19:51 ` testsuite: native/non-extended/extended modes [Re: [PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode] Jan Kratochvil
2012-01-20 19:53 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-20 19:57 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-12 20:34 ` [PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode Pedro Alves
2011-12-12 21:39 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-13 16:21 ` Fix PR remote/13492 (Re: [PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode) Pedro Alves
2011-12-13 17:23 ` Fix PR remote/13492 Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-13 16:33 ` [PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode Pedro Alves
2011-12-13 18:57 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-14 17:35 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-14 17:42 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2011-12-15 8:48 ` Regression for T (Stopped) processes [Re: [PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode] Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-15 12:44 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-15 15:33 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-13 22:27 ` [PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201112141734.43226.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox