From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201112122030.25365.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111212183734.GA24356@host2.jankratochvil.net>
Thanks again for the test.
I'm wondering why bother to mask out DR_STATUS bits instead
of clearing all of it. I mean, when we set a watchpoint, we're
already clobbering the whole of DR_CONTROL, with
i386_dr_low.set_control (new_state->dr_control_mirror);
so it seems there's no point in trying to retain all the other
bits of DR_STATUS. If we set a watchpoint, any change the
inferior had done itself to the debug registers is thrown
out the window.
If I change amd64_linux_prepare_to_resume to look like:
static void
amd64_linux_prepare_to_resume (struct lwp_info *lwp)
{
int clear_status = 0;
if (lwp->arch_private->debug_registers_changed)
{
struct i386_debug_reg_state *state = i386_debug_reg_state ();
int i;
for (i = DR_FIRSTADDR; i <= DR_LASTADDR; i++)
if (state->dr_ref_count[i] > 0)
{
amd64_linux_dr_set (lwp->ptid, i, state->dr_mirror[i]);
/* Only a sanity check for leftover bits (set possibly
only by inferior). */
clear_status = 1;
}
amd64_linux_dr_set (lwp->ptid, DR_CONTROL, state->dr_control_mirror);
lwp->arch_private->debug_registers_changed = 0;
}
if (clear_status || lwp->stopped_by_watchpoint)
amd64_linux_dr_set (lwp->ptid, DR_STATUS, 0);
}
(the `clear_status' bits are new) then the new test passes.
I'm doing a full run with this now.
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-12 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-05 16:46 Pedro Alves
2011-12-05 17:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-09 16:30 ` New tests to watch regions larger than a machine word (Re: [PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode) Pedro Alves
2011-12-09 19:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-13 16:12 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-05 21:24 ` [PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-09 16:45 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-09 16:47 ` Tristan Gingold
2011-12-09 19:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-13 16:26 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-11 23:39 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-12 11:53 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-12 14:49 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-12 0:14 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-12 17:23 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-12 18:38 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-12 20:14 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-12 20:30 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-13 17:24 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-13 18:49 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-13 19:25 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-16 16:16 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-20 19:51 ` testsuite: native/non-extended/extended modes [Re: [PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode] Jan Kratochvil
2012-01-20 19:53 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-20 19:57 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-12 20:34 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2011-12-12 21:39 ` [PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-13 16:21 ` Fix PR remote/13492 (Re: [PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode) Pedro Alves
2011-12-13 17:23 ` Fix PR remote/13492 Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-13 16:33 ` [PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode Pedro Alves
2011-12-13 18:57 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-14 17:35 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-14 17:42 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-15 8:48 ` Regression for T (Stopped) processes [Re: [PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode] Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-15 12:44 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-15 15:33 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-13 22:27 ` [PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201112122030.25365.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox