From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb.ada/catch_ex.exp, gdb.ada/mi_catch_ex.exp and unsupported catchpoints
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201112091800.02236.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3hb19fxo3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
On Friday 09 December 2011 17:43:40, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
> Joel> The problem is that we need to get to the argument of function we are
> Joel> breaking on in order to determine which exception has been raised.
> Joel> That's where we really need the debug info. I think I even added
> Joel> a comment about that in the code...
>
> Pedro> GDB knows the target's function call ABI (for infcalls), and supposedly
> Pedro> this function's prototype is cast in stone as part of the ABI too.
> Pedro> GDB could just know where to get the arguments from?
>
> Yeah, it could be done. Right now though the knowledge in GDB is in a
> form that is specific to making infcalls, not decoding them. So, adding
> this functionality would be a significant amount of work, and also
> non-trivial to test. I count 51 calls to set_gdbarch_push_dummy_call in
> the tree...
>
But _only_ 45 unique callbacks.
$ grep set_gdbarch_push_dummy_call *-tdep.c | sed 's/.*arch, //g; s/);//g' | sort | uniq | wc -l
45
:-D
Kidding aside, obviously we wouldn't need to convert
everything at once. We could even get away with only handling
the simpler prototypes we care about at first.
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-09 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-06 17:33 Pedro Alves
2011-12-07 10:07 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-12-07 15:29 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-07 16:10 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-07 22:01 ` Tom Tromey
2011-12-07 23:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-12-09 3:50 ` Tom Tromey
2011-12-09 17:20 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-09 18:00 ` Tom Tromey
2011-12-09 18:13 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2011-12-09 18:40 ` Tom Tromey
2011-12-10 22:53 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-11 20:33 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-12-20 14:53 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-10 20:26 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-11 17:42 ` [commit] Ada exception catchpoint support cleanup Joel Brobecker
2011-12-11 17:44 ` [commit] Warn if missing debug info for Ada exception catchpoints Joel Brobecker
2011-12-11 18:04 ` [commit/Ada] improve message when cannot insert Ada exception catchpoint Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201112091800.02236.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox