From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: tromey@redhat.com (Tom Tromey)
Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com (Pedro Alves), gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFC: don't set the pspace on ordinary breakpoints
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201111111255.pABCthKg015721@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3ty6bu3pg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> from "Tom Tromey" at Nov 10, 2011 01:23:23 PM
Tom Tromey wrote:
> Now I wonder whether also removing the loop from
> enable_breakpoints_after_startup is advisable. It seems less problematic,
> though.
Ah, yes, I intended my comment to apply to both loops in the same way.
The same reasons apply for the loop in enable_breakpoints_after_startup,
and just for consistency and simplicity I'd prefer to remove that second
loop as well ...
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-11 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-27 15:32 Tom Tromey
2011-10-31 1:03 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-31 12:07 ` Yao Qi
2011-11-02 18:55 ` Pedro Alves
2011-11-02 19:47 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-02 20:21 ` Pedro Alves
2011-11-03 14:01 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-03 16:02 ` Pedro Alves
2011-11-03 19:33 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-11-08 19:32 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-08 20:23 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-09 18:24 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-09 18:30 ` Pedro Alves
2011-11-09 18:41 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-10 16:53 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-10 17:49 ` Pedro Alves
2011-11-10 17:57 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-11-10 19:27 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-10 20:23 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-11 12:56 ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2011-11-11 14:47 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-14 21:12 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-16 18:37 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-11-16 21:24 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-18 18:31 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-02 18:18 ` [7.4 regression] Stand-alone Cell debugging broken (Re: RFC: don't set the pspace on ordinary breakpoints) Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-03 3:15 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-01-03 20:29 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-04 12:36 ` Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201111111255.pABCthKg015721@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com \
--to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox