From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Multi-architecture debugging regression (Re: performance of multithreading gets gradually worse under gdb)
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:25:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201110261820.13111.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201110261714.p9QHEBT8020920@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
On Wednesday 26 October 2011 18:14:11, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Pedro Alves wrote:
>
> > 2011-02-04 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> >
> > gdb/
> > * regcache.c (registers_changed_ptid): Don't explictly always
> > clear `current_regcache'. Only clear current_thread_ptid and
> > current_thread_arch when PTID matches. Only reinit the frame
> > cache if PTID matches the current inferior_ptid. Move alloca(0)
> > call to ...
> > (registers_changed): ... here.
>
> It seems this patch broke multi-architecture debugging on Cell/B.E. since
> the cached thread architecture is sometimes not invalidated when it should
> be. This happens when resume is called with a PTID that refers to all
> threads of a process.
>
> The problem is that your patch specifically handles PTIDs that refer to
> one particular thread, and also handles a wildcard PTID that refers to
> all threads of all processes. But it does not handle PTIDs that refer
> to all threads of one single process.
>
> I think the code should simply use ptid_match here (as is already done
> elsewhere, even in this same function). This fixes the problem on
> Cell/B.E. for me ...
>
> Tested on powerpc-linux (Cell/B.E.).
> Does this look OK to you?
Yes, thanks.
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-26 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201102032140.p13Le89f031563@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <201102041455.20607.pedro@codesourcery.com>
[not found] ` <m34o8jddod.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
2011-02-04 15:56 ` performance of multithreading gets gradually worse under gdb Pedro Alves
2011-02-04 15:58 ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-26 17:20 ` [patch] Multi-architecture debugging regression (Re: performance of multithreading gets gradually worse under gdb) Ulrich Weigand
2011-10-26 17:25 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2011-10-26 18:14 ` Ulrich Weigand
[not found] ` <201102041555.52179.pedro__21913.9744448059$1296834976$gmane$org@codesourcery.com>
2011-02-04 17:02 ` performance of multithreading gets gradually worse under gdb Tom Tromey
2011-02-05 9:34 ` Markus Alber
2011-02-07 14:05 ` Markus Alber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201110261820.13111.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox