Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: performance of multithreading gets gradually worse under gdb
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201102041557.58160.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201102041555.52179.pedro@codesourcery.com>

On Friday 04 February 2011 15:55:51, Pedro Alves wrote:
> [Adding gdb-patches@]

...

> Okay, thanks, I've applied it.

"it" being...

-- 
Pedro Alves

2011-02-04  Pedro Alves  <pedro@codesourcery.com>

	gdb/
	* regcache.c (registers_changed_ptid): Don't explictly always
	clear `current_regcache'.  Only clear current_thread_ptid and
	current_thread_arch when PTID matches.  Only reinit the frame
	cache if PTID matches the current inferior_ptid.  Move alloca(0)
	call to ...
	(registers_changed): ... here.

---
 gdb/regcache.c |   28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Index: src/gdb/regcache.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/regcache.c	2011-02-01 15:27:37.000000000 +0000
+++ src/gdb/regcache.c	2011-02-04 11:56:49.273328004 +0000
@@ -530,6 +530,7 @@ void
 registers_changed_ptid (ptid_t ptid)
 {
   struct regcache_list *list, **list_link;
+  int wildcard = ptid_equal (ptid, minus_one_ptid);
 
   list = current_regcache;
   list_link = &current_regcache;
@@ -550,13 +551,24 @@ registers_changed_ptid (ptid_t ptid)
       list = *list_link;
     }
 
-  current_regcache = NULL;
+  if (wildcard || ptid_equal (ptid, current_thread_ptid))
+    {
+      current_thread_ptid = null_ptid;
+      current_thread_arch = NULL;
+    }
 
-  current_thread_ptid = null_ptid;
-  current_thread_arch = NULL;
+  if (wildcard || ptid_equal (ptid, inferior_ptid))
+    {
+      /* We just deleted the regcache of the current thread.  Need to
+	 forget about any frames we have cached, too.  */
+      reinit_frame_cache ();
+    }
+}
 
-  /* Need to forget about any frames we have cached, too.  */
-  reinit_frame_cache ();
+void
+registers_changed (void)
+{
+  registers_changed_ptid (minus_one_ptid);
 
   /* Force cleanup of any alloca areas if using C alloca instead of
      a builtin alloca.  This particular call is used to clean up
@@ -567,12 +579,6 @@ registers_changed_ptid (ptid_t ptid)
 }
 
 void
-registers_changed (void)
-{
-  registers_changed_ptid (minus_one_ptid);
-}
-
-void
 regcache_raw_read (struct regcache *regcache, int regnum, gdb_byte *buf)
 {
   gdb_assert (regcache != NULL && buf != NULL);


  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-04 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <201102032140.p13Le89f031563@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
     [not found] ` <201102041455.20607.pedro@codesourcery.com>
     [not found]   ` <m34o8jddod.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
2011-02-04 15:56     ` Pedro Alves
2011-02-04 15:58       ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2011-10-26 17:20         ` [patch] Multi-architecture debugging regression (Re: performance of multithreading gets gradually worse under gdb) Ulrich Weigand
2011-10-26 17:25           ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-26 18:14             ` Ulrich Weigand
     [not found]     ` <201102041555.52179.pedro__21913.9744448059$1296834976$gmane$org@codesourcery.com>
2011-02-04 17:02       ` performance of multithreading gets gradually worse under gdb Tom Tromey
2011-02-05  9:34         ` Markus Alber
2011-02-07 14:05         ` Markus Alber
     [not found] <201102041349.p14DnCeY025641@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
2011-02-04 14:50 ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-04 14:58   ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-02-04 15:01     ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201102041557.58160.pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox