From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: entryval tail call frames $sp adjustment vs. gdbarches [Re: New ARI warning Thu Oct 13 01:55:36 UTC 2011]
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111021000010.GA28878@host1.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201110191551.p9JFpjs3020322@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:51:45 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> It's just that some of those assumptions seem really unnecessary to me.
> For example, the assumption that there is a fixed "PC" register:
>
> prev_gdbarch = frame_unwind_arch (this_frame);
> pc_regnum = gdbarch_pc_regnum (prev_gdbarch);
> if (pc_regnum == -1)
> break;
>
> /* Simulate frame_unwind_pc without setting this_frame->prev_pc.p. */
> prev_pc = frame_unwind_register_unsigned (this_frame, pc_regnum);
>
> Why don't you just do something like:
>
> prev_gdbarch = frame_unwind_arch (this_frame);
>
> /* Simulate frame_unwind_pc without setting this_frame->prev_pc.p. */
> prev_pc = gdbarch_unwind_pc (prev_gdbarch, this_frame);
I agree with this simplification, used it.
> Yes, dwarf2_frame_cfa would be preferable here.
Also I agree. Checked in both changes.
No regressions on {x86_64,x86_64-m32,i686}-fedora16pre-linux-gnu.
Thanks,
Jan
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2011-10/msg00156.html
--- src/gdb/ChangeLog 2011/10/20 23:12:59 1.13448
+++ src/gdb/ChangeLog 2011/10/20 23:57:23 1.13449
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+2011-10-20 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
+ Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
+
+ * dwarf2-frame-tailcall.c: Include dwarf2-frame.h.
+ (dwarf2_tailcall_prev_register_first): Use dwarf2_frame_cfa.
+ (dwarf2_tailcall_sniffer_first): Remove variable pc_regnum. Replace
+ gdbarch_pc_regnum and frame_unwind_register_unsigned by
+ gdbarch_unwind_pc.
+
2011-10-20 Cary Coutant <ccoutant@google.com>
* dwarf2read.c (dw2_get_file_names): Move adjustment for type
--- src/gdb/dwarf2-frame-tailcall.c 2011/10/09 20:21:48 1.1
+++ src/gdb/dwarf2-frame-tailcall.c 2011/10/20 23:57:23 1.2
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include "gdbtypes.h"
#include "regcache.h"
#include "value.h"
+#include "dwarf2-frame.h"
/* Contains struct tailcall_cache indexed by next_bottom_frame. */
static htab_t cache_htab;
@@ -280,7 +281,7 @@
if (next_levels == cache->chain_levels - 1)
addr = cache->prev_sp;
else
- addr = get_frame_base (this_frame) - cache->entry_cfa_sp_offset;
+ addr = dwarf2_frame_cfa (this_frame) - cache->entry_cfa_sp_offset;
}
else
return NULL;
@@ -380,15 +381,12 @@
/* Catch any unwinding errors. */
TRY_CATCH (except, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
{
- int pc_regnum, sp_regnum;
+ int sp_regnum;
prev_gdbarch = frame_unwind_arch (this_frame);
- pc_regnum = gdbarch_pc_regnum (prev_gdbarch);
- if (pc_regnum == -1)
- break;
/* Simulate frame_unwind_pc without setting this_frame->prev_pc.p. */
- prev_pc = frame_unwind_register_unsigned (this_frame, pc_regnum);
+ prev_pc = gdbarch_unwind_pc (prev_gdbarch, this_frame);
/* call_site_find_chain can throw an exception. */
chain = call_site_find_chain (prev_gdbarch, prev_pc, this_pc);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-21 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-13 1:55 New ARI warning Thu Oct 13 01:55:36 UTC 2011 GDB Administrator
2011-10-13 13:54 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-13 15:00 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-10-13 21:15 ` entryval tail call frames $sp adjustment vs. gdbarches [Re: New ARI warning Thu Oct 13 01:55:36 UTC 2011] Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-19 16:05 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-10-21 0:34 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2011-10-21 0:45 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111021000010.GA28878@host1.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox