Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org,        Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: FYI: fix 2 tests when glibc debuginfo is installed
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 14:52:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111015144758.GA5011@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201110142241.46746.pedro@codesourcery.com>

On 10/14, Pedro Alves wrote:
>
> On Friday 14 October 2011 22:25:10, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 23:19:09 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > > On Friday 14 October 2011 20:37:05, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > > > thanks; although these testcases are broken anyway, they should be updated for
> > > > Linux kernels 3.1.x which always keep inferior stopped if it was stopped
> > > > during PTRACE_ATTACH; probably to XFAIL older kernels.
> > >
> > > Urgh.  Even if you SIGCONT the process before PTRACE_DETACH?
> >
> > Yes.  But I do not think it is problem, one can SIGCONT it safely after
> > PTRACE_DETACH.  Just it may be (T)-stopped for a moment but why not.

Confused... SIGCONT should work even the task is traced. It won't
resume the tracee, but it should change its (internal) state to
mark it as not-stopped.

> So,
>
> no debugger:
>
> $ kill -SIGSTOP PID
> *stop*
> $ kill -SIGCONT PID
> *continue*
>
> with debugger:
>
> $ kill -SIGSTOP PID
> *stop*
>                            $ strace/gdb -p PID
>                            ...
> $ kill -SIGCONT PID
>                            ^C/detach
> *stop*
>
> Oleg, do you have a pointer to a discussion or description of the
> change? Why doesn't at least the SIGCONT cancel the stop on detach?

It does or I missed something.

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-15 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-14 16:05 Tom Tromey
2011-10-14 19:37 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-14 21:19   ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-14 21:25     ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-14 21:42       ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-15 14:52         ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-10-25 17:03           ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-25 17:38             ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-10-25 18:16               ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-25 18:38                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-10-25 19:50                   ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-16 16:41       ` Jan Kratochvil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111015144758.GA5011@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox