From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [MI RFC] entryval: MI access to entry values [Re: [RFC 06/12] entryval: Display @entry parameters in bt full]
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111003174320.GA6944@host1.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201110032105.17607.vladimir@codesourcery.com>
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 19:05:17 +0200, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> I presume the question is how important those those @entry values. If this
> is something that would cause user a big grief if not shown, we might just
> show them in format consistent with current frontends. If that's something
> nice, but not essential, than maybe 2/3 are better options.
I would like to restate that primarily I do not know a case when @entry values
are relevant for FEs and therefore for MI. FEs typically rebuild the inferior
for debugging with -O0 -g and therefore @entry values are not present at all.
Maybe one can use Nemiver to investigate some deployed application crash and
in such case I find @entry values important.
Regards,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-03 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-18 20:21 [RFC 06/12] entryval: Display @entry parameters in bt full Jan Kratochvil
2011-07-18 22:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2011-07-19 10:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-19 10:55 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-07-19 11:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-19 12:17 ` Jakub Jelinek
2011-07-19 16:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-19 17:22 ` Jakub Jelinek
2011-08-03 17:27 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-03 17:53 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-03 18:13 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-03 18:36 ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-03 19:43 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-09-02 17:08 ` [MI RFC] entryval: MI access to entry values [Re: [RFC 06/12] entryval: Display @entry parameters in bt full] Jan Kratochvil
2011-09-13 21:35 ` [MI RFC] entryval: MI access to entry values Jan Kratochvil
2011-09-14 8:50 ` Vladimir Prus
2011-09-14 9:13 ` André Pönitz
2011-09-14 9:20 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-09-14 10:45 ` André Pönitz
2011-10-03 17:00 ` Tom Tromey
2011-10-03 16:57 ` [MI RFC] entryval: MI access to entry values [Re: [RFC 06/12] entryval: Display @entry parameters in bt full] Tom Tromey
2011-10-03 17:05 ` Vladimir Prus
2011-10-03 17:44 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2011-10-03 18:14 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-10-10 16:09 ` André Pönitz
2011-07-19 10:57 ` [RFC 06/12] entryval: Display @entry parameters in bt full Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-19 16:21 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111003174320.GA6944@host1.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=vladimir@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox