Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 06/12] entryval: Display @entry parameters in bt full
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110719170411.GF2687@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83d3h66x9q.fsf@gnu.org>

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 07:38:41PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > 4) only current value is known, entry value isn't provided (the value
> >    passed to the function in the caller wasn't saved in any call saved
> >    register or memory slot and wasn't constant, or the compiler didn't
> >    provide call site info for it)
> 
> Show "optimized out" in calls and backtraces, the current value in
> response to "print foo".

This is IMHO a bad idea, the current value is still far better than
"optimized out", at least when it is obvious from the backtrace which one is
which.  All -O0 compiled code would show just "optimized out" in backtraces
for all arguments, similarly all code compiled by older compilers.
And, even for -O2 -g code the entry value will be available in roughly 50%
of cases at most.  The lack of entry value being provided doesn't mean
that the current value isn't the same as the value on entry, just that it
wasn't proved.

	Jakub


  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-19 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-18 20:21 Jan Kratochvil
2011-07-18 22:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2011-07-19 10:48   ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-19 10:55     ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-07-19 11:52       ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-19 12:17         ` Jakub Jelinek
2011-07-19 16:46           ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-19 17:22             ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2011-08-03 17:27           ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-03 17:53             ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-03 18:13               ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-03 18:36             ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-03 19:43   ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-09-02 17:08   ` [MI RFC] entryval: MI access to entry values [Re: [RFC 06/12] entryval: Display @entry parameters in bt full] Jan Kratochvil
2011-09-13 21:35     ` [MI RFC] entryval: MI access to entry values Jan Kratochvil
2011-09-14  8:50       ` Vladimir Prus
2011-09-14  9:13         ` André Pönitz
2011-09-14  9:20           ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-09-14 10:45             ` André Pönitz
2011-10-03 17:00               ` Tom Tromey
2011-10-03 16:57     ` [MI RFC] entryval: MI access to entry values [Re: [RFC 06/12] entryval: Display @entry parameters in bt full] Tom Tromey
2011-10-03 17:05       ` Vladimir Prus
2011-10-03 17:44         ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-03 18:14           ` Joel Brobecker
2011-10-10 16:09           ` André Pönitz
2011-07-19 10:57 ` [RFC 06/12] entryval: Display @entry parameters in bt full Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-19 16:21 ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110719170411.GF2687@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox