Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] 12266 (typedef'd parameters) revisited again - what should go for gdb-7.3?
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110607204404.GA3875@host1.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DEE8AC5.2080805@redhat.com>

Hi Keith,

On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:32:05 +0200, Keith Seitz wrote:
> I agree, and I will do that when I can successfully get through
> libstdc++ (and libwebkit, others?).

there are already some GDB tests being run in Red Hat on all the debuginfos,
such as -readnow, some new tests wrt breakpoints/linespec should be run on
those debuginfo collections.  Unfortunately this is still about testing
compatibility with only the recent GCC outputs and nothing else.


> >	[patch 1/2] physname reg.: linespec minsym fallback
> >	http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-06/msg00079.html
[...]
> Additionally, I would even suggest adding a fallback to
> decode_variable if decode_compound fails. This is, I believe, the
> biggest linespec regression honey pot we've seen.

This is the patch above (despite its "minsym" name).


Thanks,
Jan


      reply	other threads:[~2011-06-07 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-03 23:34 [RFA] 12266 (typedef'd parameters) revisited again Keith Seitz
2011-06-05 13:28 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-06-07 20:12   ` [RFA] 12266 (typedef'd parameters) revisited again - what should go for gdb-7.3? Jan Kratochvil
2011-06-07 20:32     ` Keith Seitz
2011-06-07 20:44       ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110607204404.GA3875@host1.jankratochvil.net \
    --to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=keiths@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox