From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19690 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2011 20:44:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 19680 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jun 2011 20:44:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:44:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p57Ki7Cf008356 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:44:08 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-113-49.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.49]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p57Ki5li015730 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:44:07 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p57Ki4Ws006441; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:44:04 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p57Ki4Sr006436; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:44:04 +0200 Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:44:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Keith Seitz Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] 12266 (typedef'd parameters) revisited again - what should go for gdb-7.3? Message-ID: <20110607204404.GA3875@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <4DE96F46.5010509@redhat.com> <20110605132815.GA26101@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20110607201143.GA10923@host1.jankratochvil.net> <4DEE8AC5.2080805@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DEE8AC5.2080805@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00104.txt.bz2 Hi Keith, On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:32:05 +0200, Keith Seitz wrote: > I agree, and I will do that when I can successfully get through > libstdc++ (and libwebkit, others?). there are already some GDB tests being run in Red Hat on all the debuginfos, such as -readnow, some new tests wrt breakpoints/linespec should be run on those debuginfo collections. Unfortunately this is still about testing compatibility with only the recent GCC outputs and nothing else. > > [patch 1/2] physname reg.: linespec minsym fallback > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-06/msg00079.html [...] > Additionally, I would even suggest adding a fallback to > decode_variable if decode_compound fails. This is, I believe, the > biggest linespec regression honey pot we've seen. This is the patch above (despite its "minsym" name). Thanks, Jan