Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerome Guitton <guitton@adacore.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] sparc-solaris stack-checking - new prologue sequence
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 10:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110519101711.GT66900@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201105190943.p4J9hkTv026774@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 644 bytes --]

Mark Kettenis (mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl):

> I had wanted to give this a spin on OpenBSD/sparc, but unfortunately
> my SS20 seems to have hardware issues.  Origionally I thought the
> changes were restricted to 32-bit code.  But it seems this code is use
> for 64-bit code as well.  So I'll give this a spin on an
> OpenBSD/sparc64 machine tonight.

OK, perfect. Thank you.

In any case, I have fixed the space inconsistencies that I introduced;
the new patch is in attachment. I noticed that there are other
inconsistencies that are worth fixing in sparc_skip_stack_check (on
clr instructions in particular); I'll do that on a separate patch.


[-- Attachment #2: sparc-tdep.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 4298 bytes --]

gdb/ChangeLog:

	* sparc-tdep.c (sparc_skip_stack_check): Recognize a new instruction
	sequence for probing loops.

diff --git a/gdb/sparc-tdep.c b/gdb/sparc-tdep.c
index 1039bd8..87d6f76 100644
--- a/gdb/sparc-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/sparc-tdep.c
@@ -609,19 +609,46 @@ sparc_skip_stack_check (const CORE_ADDR start_pc)
   CORE_ADDR pc = start_pc;
   unsigned long insn;
   int offset_stack_checking_sequence = 0;
+  int probing_loop = 0;
 
   /* With GCC, all stack checking sequences begin with the same two
-     instructions.  */
+     instructions, plus an optional one in the case of a probing loop:
 
-  /* sethi <some immediate>,%g1 */
+         sethi <some immediate>, %g1
+         sub %sp, %g1, %g1
+
+     or:
+
+         sethi <some immediate>, %g1
+         sethi <some immediate>, %g4
+         sub %sp, %g1, %g1
+
+     or:
+
+         sethi <some immediate>, %g1
+         sub %sp, %g1, %g1
+         sethi <some immediate>, %g4
+
+     If the optional instruction is found (setting g4), assume that a
+     probing loop will follow.  */
+
+  /* sethi <some immediate>, %g1 */
   insn = sparc_fetch_instruction (pc);
   pc = pc + 4;
   if (!(X_OP (insn) == 0 && X_OP2 (insn) == 0x4 && X_RD (insn) == 1))
     return start_pc;
 
-  /* sub %sp, %g1, %g1 */
+  /* optional: sethi <some immediate>, %g4 */
   insn = sparc_fetch_instruction (pc);
   pc = pc + 4;
+  if (X_OP (insn) == 0 && X_OP2 (insn) == 0x4 && X_RD (insn) == 4)
+    {
+      probing_loop = 1;
+      insn = sparc_fetch_instruction (pc);
+      pc = pc + 4;
+    }
+
+  /* sub %sp, %g1, %g1 */
   if (!(X_OP (insn) == 2 && X_OP3 (insn) == 0x4 && !X_I(insn)
         && X_RD (insn) == 1 && X_RS1 (insn) == 14 && X_RS2 (insn) == 1))
     return start_pc;
@@ -629,6 +656,14 @@ sparc_skip_stack_check (const CORE_ADDR start_pc)
   insn = sparc_fetch_instruction (pc);
   pc = pc + 4;
 
+  /* optional: sethi <some immediate>, %g4 */
+  if (X_OP (insn) == 0 && X_OP2 (insn) == 0x4 && X_RD (insn) == 4)
+    {
+      probing_loop = 1;
+      insn = sparc_fetch_instruction (pc);
+      pc = pc + 4;
+    }
+
   /* First possible sequence:
          [first two instructions above]
          clr [%g1 - some immediate]  */
@@ -680,22 +715,21 @@ sparc_skip_stack_check (const CORE_ADDR start_pc)
     }
   
   /* Third sequence: A probing loop.
-         [first two instructions above]
-         sethi  <some immediate>, %g4
+         [first three instructions above]
          sub  %g1, %g4, %g4
          cmp  %g1, %g4
          be  <disp>
          add  %g1, -<some immediate>, %g1
          ba  <disp>
          clr  [%g1]
+
+     And an optional last probe for the remainder:
+
          clr [%g4 - some immediate]  */
 
-  /* sethi  <some immediate>, %g4 */
-  else if (X_OP (insn) == 0 && X_OP2 (insn) == 0x4 && X_RD (insn) == 4)
+  if (probing_loop)
     {
       /* sub  %g1, %g4, %g4 */
-      insn = sparc_fetch_instruction (pc);
-      pc = pc + 4;
       if (!(X_OP (insn) == 2 && X_OP3 (insn) == 0x4 && !X_I(insn)
             && X_RD (insn) == 4 && X_RS1 (insn) == 1 && X_RS2 (insn) == 4))
         return start_pc;
@@ -726,22 +760,24 @@ sparc_skip_stack_check (const CORE_ADDR start_pc)
       if (!(X_OP (insn) == 0 && X_COND (insn) == 0x8))
         return start_pc;
 
-      /* clr  [%g1] */
+      /* clr  [%g1] (st %g0, [%g1] or st %g0, [%g1+0]) */
       insn = sparc_fetch_instruction (pc);
       pc = pc + 4;
-      if (!(X_OP (insn) == 3 && X_OP3(insn) == 0x4 && !X_I(insn)
-            && X_RD (insn) == 0 && X_RS1 (insn) == 1))
+      if (!(X_OP (insn) == 3 && X_OP3(insn) == 0x4
+            && X_RD (insn) == 0 && X_RS1 (insn) == 1
+	    && (!X_I(insn) || X_SIMM13 (insn) == 0)))
         return start_pc;
 
-      /* clr [%g4 - some immediate]  */
+      /* We found a valid stack-check sequence, return the new PC.  */
+
+      /* optional: clr [%g4 - some immediate]  */
       insn = sparc_fetch_instruction (pc);
       pc = pc + 4;
       if (!(X_OP (insn) == 3 && X_OP3(insn) == 0x4 && X_I(insn)
             && X_RS1 (insn) == 4 && X_RD (insn) == 0))
-        return start_pc;
-
-      /* We found a valid stack-check sequence, return the new PC.  */
-      return pc;
+        return pc - 4;
+      else
+	return pc;
     }
 
   /* No stack check code in our prologue, return the start_pc.  */

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-19 10:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-06  0:46 Jerome Guitton
2011-05-19  9:20 ` Jerome Guitton
2011-05-19  9:44   ` Mark Kettenis
2011-05-19 10:17     ` Jerome Guitton [this message]
2011-05-20 17:32       ` Mark Kettenis
2011-05-23 16:38         ` Jerome Guitton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110519101711.GT66900@adacore.com \
    --to=guitton@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox