Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerome Guitton <guitton@adacore.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] Support for x86 on-stack trampolines
Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 15:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110505151014.GD72917@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201105041530.p44FUMhC015899@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>

Mark Kettenis (mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl):

> Ah, it looks like I created some confusement.  It is i386_find_insn()
> as a name that I object to; simply name that funcion i386_match_insn()
> and give it the old comment for i386_match_insn(), and I'm happy.
> That way you don't have to adjust any of its callers.
> 
> i386_match_pattern() is fine as the name for the broken out code that
> matches only a single pattern.


Ah, OK, I was confused indeed. Patch updated! OK to apply?


gdb/ChangeLog:

	* i386-tdep.c (i386_in_stack_tramp_p, i386_stack_tramp_frame_sniffer):
	New functions.
	(i386_stack_tramp_frame_unwind): New static global.
	(i386_match_pattern): New function, extracted from i386_match_insn.
	(i386_match_insn): Use i386_match_pattern.
	(i386_match_insn_block): New function.
	(i386_tramp_chain_in_reg_insns)
	(i386_tramp_chain_on_stack_insns): New static variables.
	(i386_gdbarch_init): Add i386_stack_tramp_frame_unwind to list
	of unwinders.

diff --git a/gdb/i386-tdep.c b/gdb/i386-tdep.c
index 5f4089b..b2b7412 100644
--- a/gdb/i386-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/i386-tdep.c
@@ -1126,47 +1126,93 @@ struct i386_insn
   gdb_byte mask[I386_MAX_MATCHED_INSN_LEN];
 };
 
-/* Search for the instruction at PC in the list SKIP_INSNS.  Return
-   the first instruction description that matches.  Otherwise, return
-   NULL.  */
+/* Return whether instruction at PC matches PATTERN.  */
 
-static struct i386_insn *
-i386_match_insn (CORE_ADDR pc, struct i386_insn *skip_insns)
+static int
+i386_match_pattern (CORE_ADDR pc, struct i386_insn pattern)
 {
-  struct i386_insn *insn;
   gdb_byte op;
 
   if (target_read_memory (pc, &op, 1))
-    return NULL;
+    return 0;
 
-  for (insn = skip_insns; insn->len > 0; insn++)
+  if ((op & pattern.mask[0]) == pattern.insn[0])
     {
-      if ((op & insn->mask[0]) == insn->insn[0])
-	{
-	  gdb_byte buf[I386_MAX_MATCHED_INSN_LEN - 1];
-	  int insn_matched = 1;
-	  size_t i;
-
-	  gdb_assert (insn->len > 1);
-	  gdb_assert (insn->len <= I386_MAX_MATCHED_INSN_LEN);
+      gdb_byte buf[I386_MAX_MATCHED_INSN_LEN - 1];
+      int insn_matched = 1;
+      size_t i;
 
-	  if (target_read_memory (pc + 1, buf, insn->len - 1))
-	    return NULL;
+      gdb_assert (pattern.len > 1);
+      gdb_assert (pattern.len <= I386_MAX_MATCHED_INSN_LEN);
 
-	  for (i = 1; i < insn->len; i++)
-	    {
-	      if ((buf[i - 1] & insn->mask[i]) != insn->insn[i])
-		insn_matched = 0;
-	    }
+      if (target_read_memory (pc + 1, buf, pattern.len - 1))
+	return 0;
 
-	  if (insn_matched)
-	    return insn;
+      for (i = 1; i < pattern.len; i++)
+	{
+	  if ((buf[i - 1] & pattern.mask[i]) != pattern.insn[i])
+	    insn_matched = 0;
 	}
+      return insn_matched;
+    }
+  return 0;
+}
+
+/* Search for the instruction at PC in the list INSN_PATTERNS.  Return
+   the first instruction description that matches.  Otherwise, return
+   NULL.  */
+
+static struct i386_insn *
+i386_match_insn (CORE_ADDR pc, struct i386_insn *insn_patterns)
+{
+  struct i386_insn *pattern;
+
+  for (pattern = insn_patterns; pattern->len > 0; pattern++)
+    {
+      if (i386_match_pattern (pc, *pattern))
+	return pattern;
     }
 
   return NULL;
 }
 
+/* Return whether PC points inside a sequence of instructions that
+   matches INSN_PATTERNS.  */
+
+static int
+i386_match_insn_block (CORE_ADDR pc, struct i386_insn *insn_patterns)
+{
+  CORE_ADDR current_pc;
+  int ix, i;
+  gdb_byte op;
+  struct i386_insn *insn;
+
+  insn = i386_match_insn (pc, insn_patterns);
+  if (insn == NULL)
+    return 0;
+
+  current_pc = pc - insn->len;
+  ix = insn - insn_patterns;
+  for (i = ix - 1; i >= 0; i--)
+    {
+      if (!i386_match_pattern (current_pc, insn_patterns[i]))
+	return 0;
+
+      current_pc -= insn_patterns[i].len;
+    }
+
+  current_pc = pc + insn->len;
+  for (insn = insn_patterns + ix + 1; insn->len > 0; insn++)
+    {
+      if (!i386_match_pattern (current_pc, *insn))
+	return 0;
+
+      current_pc += insn->len;
+    }
+
+  return 1;
+}
+
 /* Some special instructions that might be migrated by GCC into the
    part of the prologue that sets up the new stack frame.  Because the
    stack frame hasn't been setup yet, no registers have been saved
@@ -1938,6 +1984,88 @@ static const struct frame_unwind i386_epilogue_frame_unwind =
 };
 \f
 
+/* Stack-based trampolines.  */
+
+/* These trampolines are used on cross x86 targets, when taking the
+   address of a nested function.  When executing these trampolines,
+   no stack frame is set up, so we are in a similar situation as in
+   epilogues and i386_epilogue_frame_this_id can be re-used.  */
+
+/* Static chain passed in register.  */
+
+struct i386_insn i386_tramp_chain_in_reg_insns[] =
+{
+  /* `movl imm32, %eax' and `movl imm32, %ecx' */
+  { 5, { 0xb8 }, { 0xfe } },
+
+  /* `jmp imm32' */
+  { 5, { 0xe9 }, { 0xff } },
+
+  {0}
+};
+
+/* Static chain passed on stack (when regparm=3).  */
+
+struct i386_insn i386_tramp_chain_on_stack_insns[] =
+{
+  /* `push imm32' */
+  { 5, { 0x68 }, { 0xff } },
+
+  /* `jmp imm32' */
+  { 5, { 0xe9 }, { 0xff } },
+
+  {0}
+};
+
+/* Return whether PC points inside a stack trampoline.   */
+
+static int
+i386_in_stack_tramp_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR pc)
+{
+  gdb_byte insn;
+  char *name;
+
+  /* A stack trampoline is detected if no name is associated
+    to the current pc and if it points inside a trampoline
+    sequence.  */
+
+  find_pc_partial_function (pc, &name, NULL, NULL);
+  if (name)
+    return 0;
+
+  if (target_read_memory (pc, &insn, 1))
+    return 0;
+
+  if (!i386_match_insn_block (pc, i386_tramp_chain_in_reg_insns)
+      && !i386_match_insn_block (pc, i386_tramp_chain_on_stack_insns))
+    return 0;
+
+  return 1;
+}
+
+static int
+i386_stack_tramp_frame_sniffer (const struct frame_unwind *self,
+			     struct frame_info *this_frame,
+			     void **this_prologue_cache)
+{
+  if (frame_relative_level (this_frame) == 0)
+    return i386_in_stack_tramp_p (get_frame_arch (this_frame),
+				  get_frame_pc (this_frame));
+  else
+    return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct frame_unwind i386_stack_tramp_frame_unwind =
+{
+  NORMAL_FRAME,
+  i386_epilogue_frame_unwind_stop_reason,
+  i386_epilogue_frame_this_id,
+  i386_frame_prev_register,
+  NULL, 
+  i386_stack_tramp_frame_sniffer
+};
+\f
+
 /* Signal trampolines.  */
 
 static struct i386_frame_cache *
@@ -7295,6 +7423,7 @@ i386_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch_list *arches)
     tdep->mm0_regnum = -1;
 
   /* Hook in the legacy prologue-based unwinders last (fallback).  */
+  frame_unwind_append_unwinder (gdbarch, &i386_stack_tramp_frame_unwind);
   frame_unwind_append_unwinder (gdbarch, &i386_sigtramp_frame_unwind);
   frame_unwind_append_unwinder (gdbarch, &i386_frame_unwind);
 


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-05 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-04  0:21 Jerome Guitton
2011-05-04  8:55 ` Pedro Alves
2011-05-04 14:52   ` Jerome Guitton
2011-05-04 10:20 ` Mark Kettenis
2011-05-04 15:17   ` Jerome Guitton
2011-05-04 15:31     ` Mark Kettenis
2011-05-05 15:10       ` Jerome Guitton [this message]
2011-05-05 15:18         ` Mark Kettenis
2011-05-05 16:03           ` Jerome Guitton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110505151014.GD72917@adacore.com \
    --to=guitton@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox