From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: bauerman@br.ibm.com (Thiago Jung Bauermann)
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org (gdb-patches ml)
Subject: Re: [RFA 2/3] Demote to sw watchpoint only in update_watchpoint
Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 11:04:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201105051104.p45B4MjG001575@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304398546.2245.80.camel@hactar> from "Thiago Jung Bauermann" at May 03, 2011 01:55:46 AM
Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> On the other hand, the current code is already broken in that regard,
> and creating several read and access watchpoints on today's GDB will
> confuse it and allow creating more hardware watchpoints (read, access or
> regular) than possible. Thus, this patch doesn't make the situation any
> worse. So now I just use b->type.
>
> The real fix IMHO would be to make the -tdep code manage the creation
> and deletion of bp_locations, so that it could always make an informed
> decision about what can and cannot be done with the available hardware
> debug resources. But that's out of the scope of this patch series.
Yes, I'd agree with Eli and Pedro that this really ought to be fixed.
I also agree that this is independent of this patch (and in fact I'd
consider the patch a (small) step in the right direction anyway,
since it reduced the number of locations in the code where resource
accounting is done) ...
> 2011-05-03 Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>
>
> * breakpoint.c (update_watchpoint): Change between software and
> hardware watchpoint for all kinds of watchpoints, not just
> read/write ones. Determine b->exact value here instead of
> in watch_command_1. Error out if there are not enough resources
> for a read or access hardware watchpoint.
> (watch_command_1): Remove logic of checking whether there are
> enough resources available, since update_watchpoint will do that
> work now. Don't set b->exact here. Catch exceptions thrown by
> update_watchpoint and delete the watchpoint.
> (can_use_hardware_watchpoint): Remove exact_watchpoints argument.
> Use target_exact_watchpoints instead.
> (delete_breakpoint): Notify observers only if deleted watchpoint
> has a breakpoint number assigned to it.
As Eli has withdrawn objections to the patch, this is OK.
Thanks,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-05 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-13 20:55 [RFA] Implement support for PowerPC BookE masked watchpoints Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-01-31 20:09 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-02-17 15:10 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-04-18 21:22 ` [RFA 1/3] Change watchpoint's enable state in do_enable_breakpoint Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-04-29 17:21 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-05-04 0:11 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-04-18 21:22 ` [RFA 2/3] Demote to sw watchpoint only in update_watchpoint Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-04-29 17:26 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-05-03 4:56 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-05-03 6:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-05-03 9:58 ` Pedro Alves
2011-05-03 16:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-05-03 17:41 ` Pedro Alves
2011-05-03 18:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-05-03 18:12 ` Pedro Alves
2011-05-03 20:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-05-04 0:03 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-05-04 3:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-05-04 22:21 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-05-05 3:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-05-05 8:15 ` Pedro Alves
2011-05-05 10:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-05-05 15:27 ` Pedro Alves
2011-05-05 16:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-05-05 11:10 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-05-05 15:21 ` Pedro Alves
2011-05-04 19:12 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-05-04 20:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-05-04 22:22 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-05-05 11:04 ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2011-04-18 21:24 ` [RFA 3/3] Implement support for PowerPC BookE masked watchpoints Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-04-29 17:46 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-05-03 4:56 ` [needs doc review] " Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-05-03 6:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-05-05 21:57 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-05-06 10:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-05-06 20:35 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-05-05 11:07 ` Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201105051104.p45B4MjG001575@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com \
--to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bauerman@br.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox