From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] Re: [RFA] c++/11734 revisited (and c++/12273)
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110317031911.GA13470@host1.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110316232046.GV31264@adacore.com>
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:20:46 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> Does it mean that we should be good to go for the 7.2.1 release soon?
There is yet
Re: [RFA] c++/12506
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-03/msg00742.html
which is also a physname regression and the fix is not anything large IMO.
> It seems that finding these fixes have been a bit long and treacherous,
> so we may want to think twice about putting it in 7.2 (?);
as 7.3 should be released soon with all the delays on 7.2.x I am no longer
sure how much valid is the 7.2.x release now.
Thanks,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-17 3:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-09 0:50 [RFA] c++/11734 revisited Keith Seitz
2010-12-09 4:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-12-09 21:45 ` Tom Tromey
2010-12-09 21:52 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-12-10 15:21 ` Keith Seitz
2010-12-14 20:03 ` Keith Seitz
2011-01-24 18:15 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-01-26 23:14 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-02-06 22:04 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-02-06 22:45 ` [patch 0/3] Re: [RFA] c++/11734 revisited (and c++/12273) Jan Kratochvil
2011-02-08 21:42 ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-10 21:45 ` Keith Seitz
2011-02-17 18:37 ` Keith Seitz
2011-02-18 3:24 ` Keith Seitz
2011-02-21 11:41 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-02-24 20:41 ` Keith Seitz
2011-02-27 21:18 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-03-01 22:00 ` Keith Seitz
2011-03-14 7:52 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-03-15 19:03 ` Keith Seitz
2011-03-16 8:28 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-03-16 13:58 ` Tom Tromey
2011-03-16 23:20 ` Keith Seitz
2011-03-17 3:19 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-03-17 9:11 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2011-03-17 13:21 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-02-06 22:46 ` [patch 1/3] revert physname part (b) [Re: [RFA] c++/11734 revisited] Jan Kratochvil
2011-02-06 22:46 ` [patch 2/3] Keith's psymtabs fix " Jan Kratochvil
2011-02-06 22:46 ` [patch 3/3] Various linespec fixups " Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110317031911.GA13470@host1.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=keiths@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox