From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21762 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2011 03:19:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 21750 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Mar 2011 03:19:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 03:19:42 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2H3JJHx018668 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:19:19 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2H3JH5C026720 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:19:18 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2H3JG5X015032; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 04:19:16 +0100 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p2H3JDSw013509; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 04:19:13 +0100 Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:11:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Keith Seitz , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] Re: [RFA] c++/11734 revisited (and c++/12273) Message-ID: <20110317031911.GA13470@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20110227211637.GA18378@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <4D6D6C74.8080304@redhat.com> <20110313222824.GA24322@host1.jankratochvil.net> <4D7FB469.9080703@redhat.com> <20110316065928.GA3316@host1.jankratochvil.net> <4D8130B1.6070505@redhat.com> <20110316232046.GV31264@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110316232046.GV31264@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00886.txt.bz2 On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:20:46 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Does it mean that we should be good to go for the 7.2.1 release soon? There is yet Re: [RFA] c++/12506 http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-03/msg00742.html which is also a physname regression and the fix is not anything large IMO. > It seems that finding these fixes have been a bit long and treacherous, > so we may want to think twice about putting it in 7.2 (?); as 7.3 should be released soon with all the delays on 7.2.x I am no longer sure how much valid is the 7.2.x release now. Thanks, Jan