Re: [patch gdb]: Fix some DOS-path related issues in gdb

[Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>]

On Thursday 03 March 2011 15:41:27, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2011/3/3 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>:
> > On Thursday 03 March 2011 14:58:32, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> >> > I didn't know that the Windows 64bit target can use ELF debug info.
> >> > Can it?  With what toolchains?
> >> >
> >> > As for mdebugread.c, I always thought it was MIPS specific.  What
> >> > other platforms use it?
> >>
> >> These would still be pertinent in the case of cross debugging, no?
> >> If the files were cross-compiled on Windows, the debug info would
> >> contain file paths that follow the Windows convention...
> >
> > And then if you try to debug that on GNU/Linux, things still
> > won't work, because filename_cmp changes behavior depending on host,
> > not target or context.  That's why I believe there should be a clear
> > distinction between what's a source path, and a host path.  I think
> > Kai's bfd changes affect host paths, so they're fine. (haven't really
> > checked, but that's what I imagine).  For source paths, I'd rather
> > have this patch resurected...
> >
> >  <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-12/msg00343.html>
> >
> > I haven't looked at Kai's patch to see if it affects host
> > paths or source paths.
> >
> > --
> > Pedro Alves
> >
> 
> Well Pedro,
> 
> this is exactly the point I described in my reply to Eli. The
> debugging of cross-compiled binaries via systems with different
> filename/path representation was and is still not operating. Here it
> would be necessary to provide host<->creator information for doing a
> mapping. And this isn't handled by this patch.
> But at least this patch takes care that stuff compiled on a host with
> host-compiler using DOS-paths is able to operate correct. And ELF is
> an object-file format and has in principle nothing to do with unix and
> can be used (with loader-support) on any specifc OS.

It sounds like you didn't follow the url I pointed at?

-- 
Pedro Alves