Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: brobecker@adacore.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] Add tdep files for x86 and powerpc.
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201102241856.p1OIugJQ004697@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1298569763-18784-17-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com>	(message from Joel Brobecker on Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:49:21 -0500)

> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> 
> This patch adds a new GDB_OSABI_VXWORKS for VxWorks targets, and
> introduces new VxWorks tdep files for x86 and powerpc.  They will
> be included in the build by the next patch.
> 
> gdb/ChangeLog:
> 
>         * defs.h (enum gdb_osabi): Add GDB_OSABI_VXWORKS.
>         * osabi.c (gdb_osabi_names): Add entry for GDB_OSABI_VXWORKS.
>         * i386-vxworks-tdep.c, rs6000-vxworks-tdep.c: New files.
> ---
>  gdb/defs.h                |    1 +
>  gdb/i386-vxworks-tdep.c   |   53 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  gdb/osabi.c               |    1 +
>  gdb/rs6000-vxworks-tdep.c |  105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gdb/i386-vxworks-tdep.c
>  create mode 100644 gdb/rs6000-vxworks-tdep.c

The i386 bits have my blessing.  The powerpc bits look a bit weird though:

> +static CORE_ADDR
> +rs6000_vxworks_push_dummy_code (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
> +				CORE_ADDR sp, CORE_ADDR funaddr,
> +				struct value **args, int nargs,
> +				struct type *value_type,
> +				CORE_ADDR *real_pc, CORE_ADDR *bp_addr,
> +				struct regcache *regcache)
> +{
> +  /* Something here to findout the size of a breakpoint and then
> +     allocate space for it on the stack.  */
> +  int bplen;
> +  /* This code assumes frame align.  */
> +  gdb_assert (gdbarch_frame_align_p (gdbarch));
> +  /* Force the stack's alignment.  The intent is to ensure that the SP
> +     is aligned to at least a breakpoint instruction's boundary.  */
> +  sp = gdbarch_frame_align (gdbarch, sp);
> +  /* Allocate space for, and then position the breakpoint on the stack.  */
> +  if (gdbarch_inner_than (gdbarch, 1, 2))
> +    {
> +      CORE_ADDR bppc = sp;
> +      gdbarch_breakpoint_from_pc (gdbarch, &bppc, &bplen);
> +      sp = gdbarch_frame_align (gdbarch, sp - bplen);
> +      (*bp_addr) = sp;
> +      /* Should the breakpoint size/location be re-computed here?  */
> +    }
> +  else
> +    {
> +      (*bp_addr) = sp;
> +      gdbarch_breakpoint_from_pc (gdbarch, bp_addr, &bplen);
> +      sp = gdbarch_frame_align (gdbarch, sp + bplen);
> +    }

This bit of code looks like it is trying to support both stacks
growing up and stack growing down.  Does that really happen on
VxWorks?  Your code doesn't call set_gdbarch_inner_than(), so at least
one of these branches must be dead code.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-24 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-24 17:49 Add support for VxWorks 5.x, 6.x and 653 Joel Brobecker
2011-02-24 17:49 ` [PATCH 01/18] Some ada-lang/ada-tasks routines needed by the VxWorks target Joel Brobecker
2011-02-24 17:50 ` [PATCH 03/18] New general purpose routines in utils.c Joel Brobecker
2011-02-24 19:06   ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-24 17:50 ` [PATCH 04/18] add new "unload" command (symetry of existing "load" command) Joel Brobecker
2011-02-24 19:22   ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-24 17:50 ` [PATCH 02/18] New command_post observer Joel Brobecker
2011-02-24 18:58   ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-24 17:51 ` [PATCH 05/18] new struct bp_target_info target_private_data field Joel Brobecker
2011-02-24 17:54 ` [PATCH 06/18] New module remote-wtx-utils Joel Brobecker
2011-02-24 19:26   ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-24 17:54 ` [PATCH 09/18] VxWorks breakpoint-handling module Joel Brobecker
2011-02-24 17:54 ` [PATCH 08/18] Add options to control Vxworks related settings Joel Brobecker
2011-02-24 17:55 ` [PATCH 10/18] "multi-tasks-mode" support Joel Brobecker
2011-02-24 17:56 ` [PATCH 07/18] remote-wtxapi: The WTX API abstraction layer Joel Brobecker
2011-02-24 19:44   ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-24 17:56 ` [PATCH 11/18] Add partition support Joel Brobecker
2011-02-25 16:17   ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-24 17:57 ` [PATCH 13/18] Add new "wtx" target Joel Brobecker
2011-02-25 16:15   ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-25 17:38     ` Joel Brobecker
2011-02-24 17:57 ` [PATCH 12/18] remote-wtx-hw: register fetch/store support Joel Brobecker
2011-02-24 17:57 ` [PATCH 14/18] WTX-TCL support module Joel Brobecker
2011-02-25 15:59   ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-25 18:58     ` Joel Brobecker
2011-02-28 15:37       ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-24 17:58 ` [PATCH 15/18] Add support for VxWorks 6 Joel Brobecker
2011-02-24 17:59 ` [PATCH 17/18] Configury and Makefile updates for VxWorks Joel Brobecker
2011-02-24 17:59 ` [PATCH 16/18] Add tdep files for x86 and powerpc Joel Brobecker
2011-02-24 18:58   ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2011-02-25  8:29     ` Joel Brobecker
2011-02-24 18:04 ` [PATCH 18/18] document the new VxWorks port Joel Brobecker
2011-02-24 20:27   ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-25 11:12     ` Jerome Guitton
2011-02-25 11:27       ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-25 11:38         ` Jerome Guitton
2011-02-25 11:38           ` Joel Brobecker
2011-02-25 12:08             ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-25 13:26               ` Jerome Guitton
2011-02-25 11:44           ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-25 11:49             ` Joel Brobecker
2011-02-25 11:55               ` Jerome Guitton
2011-02-25 11:56                 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-02-25 12:01                   ` Pedro Alves
2011-02-25 14:21                     ` Joel Brobecker
2011-02-25 14:44                       ` Pedro Alves
2011-02-25 15:15                         ` Joel Brobecker
2011-02-25 12:05                   ` Jerome Guitton
2011-02-25 12:15                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-25 12:56                       ` Joel Brobecker
2011-02-25 13:20                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-25 14:11                           ` Jerome Guitton
2011-03-03 12:16     ` Joel Brobecker
2011-03-03 13:44       ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201102241856.p1OIugJQ004697@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
    --to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox