From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: pedro@codesourcery.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: No longer accept NULL values in value_bits_valid and value_bits_synthetic_pointer
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201102141450.p1EEoNV6003363@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201102141158.02189.pedro@codesourcery.com> (message from Pedro Alves on Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:58:02 +0000)
> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:58:02 +0000
>
> On Monday 14 February 2011 11:56:49, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > Following up on
> > <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-02/msg00201.html>.
> >
> > I've checked in this patch. We shouldn't be getting
> > NULL values here anymore. If I missed a case were we do, the
> > offending caller needs to be fixed to not pass it.
> >
> > Pedro Alves
> >
> > 2011-02-14 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> >
> > * value.c (value_bits_valid, value_bits_synthetic_pointer):
> > No longer handle NULL values.
>
> Sigh.
>
> 2011-02-14 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
>
> * value.c (value_bits_valid, value_bits_synthetic_pointer):
> No longer handle NULL values.
Would it be a good idea to add a gdb_assert() here to check for a NULL pointer?
> ---
> gdb/value.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: src/gdb/value.c
> ===================================================================
> --- src.orig/gdb/value.c 2011-02-11 15:53:44.717504003 +0000
> +++ src/gdb/value.c 2011-02-11 15:53:51.457503999 +0000
> @@ -998,7 +998,7 @@ value_entirely_optimized_out (const stru
> int
> value_bits_valid (const struct value *value, int offset, int length)
> {
> - if (value == NULL || !value->optimized_out)
> + if (!value->optimized_out)
> return 1;
> if (value->lval != lval_computed
> || !value->location.computed.funcs->check_validity)
> @@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ int
> value_bits_synthetic_pointer (const struct value *value,
> int offset, int length)
> {
> - if (value == NULL || value->lval != lval_computed
> + if (value->lval != lval_computed
> || !value->location.computed.funcs->check_synthetic_pointer)
> return 0;
> return value->location.computed.funcs->check_synthetic_pointer (value,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-14 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-14 11:56 Pedro Alves
2011-02-14 11:58 ` Pedro Alves
2011-02-14 15:17 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2011-02-14 15:29 ` Pedro Alves
2011-02-14 16:00 ` Mark Kettenis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201102141450.p1EEoNV6003363@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox