Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: pedro@codesourcery.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: No longer accept NULL values in value_bits_valid and value_bits_synthetic_pointer
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201102141450.p1EEoNV6003363@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201102141158.02189.pedro@codesourcery.com> (message from Pedro	Alves on Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:58:02 +0000)

> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:58:02 +0000
> 
> On Monday 14 February 2011 11:56:49, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > Following up on
> > <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-02/msg00201.html>.
> > 
> > I've checked in this patch.  We shouldn't be getting
> > NULL values here anymore.  If I missed a case were we do, the
> > offending caller needs to be fixed to not pass it.
> > 
> > Pedro Alves
> > 
> > 2011-02-14  Pedro Alves  <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> > 
> >         * value.c (value_bits_valid, value_bits_synthetic_pointer):
> >         No longer handle NULL values.
> 
> Sigh.
> 
> 2011-02-14  Pedro Alves  <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> 
> 	* value.c (value_bits_valid, value_bits_synthetic_pointer):
> 	No longer handle NULL values.

Would it be a good idea to add a gdb_assert() here to check for a NULL pointer?

> ---
>  gdb/value.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: src/gdb/value.c
> ===================================================================
> --- src.orig/gdb/value.c	2011-02-11 15:53:44.717504003 +0000
> +++ src/gdb/value.c	2011-02-11 15:53:51.457503999 +0000
> @@ -998,7 +998,7 @@ value_entirely_optimized_out (const stru
>  int
>  value_bits_valid (const struct value *value, int offset, int length)
>  {
> -  if (value == NULL || !value->optimized_out)
> +  if (!value->optimized_out)
>      return 1;
>    if (value->lval != lval_computed
>        || !value->location.computed.funcs->check_validity)
> @@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ int
>  value_bits_synthetic_pointer (const struct value *value,
>  			      int offset, int length)
>  {
> -  if (value == NULL || value->lval != lval_computed
> +  if (value->lval != lval_computed
>        || !value->location.computed.funcs->check_synthetic_pointer)
>      return 0;
>    return value->location.computed.funcs->check_synthetic_pointer (value,
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-14 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-14 11:56 Pedro Alves
2011-02-14 11:58 ` Pedro Alves
2011-02-14 15:17   ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2011-02-14 15:29     ` Pedro Alves
2011-02-14 16:00       ` Mark Kettenis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201102141450.p1EEoNV6003363@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
    --to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox